1. Home
  2. sleep disorders

sleep disorders

Restless Legs Syndrome: A Review

Author/s: 
John W. Winkelman, Benjamin Wipper

Importance Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sleep-related movement disorder that affects approximately 3% of US adults to a clinically significant extent and can cause substantial sleep disturbance.

Observations Restless legs syndrome is characterized by an overwhelming urge to move the limbs, typically the legs, often accompanied by unpleasant limb sensations (eg, achiness, tingling). Symptoms, provoked by immobility, are relieved while moving and are typically present or most severe in the evening or at night. Restless legs syndrome symptoms may lead to difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or returning to sleep. According to population-based studies, approximately 8% of US adults experience RLS symptoms of any frequency annually and 3% experience moderately or severely distressing symptoms at least twice weekly. Patients with RLS have impaired quality of life and elevated rates of cardiovascular disease (29.6% with coronary artery disease, stroke, or heart failure), depression (30.4%), and suicidal ideation or self-harm (0.35 cases/1000 person-years). Restless legs syndrome is common among patients with multiple sclerosis (27.5%), end-stage kidney disease (24%), and iron deficiency anemia (23.9%); during pregnancy and especially in the third trimester (22%); with peripheral neuropathy (eg, diabetic, idiopathic; 21.5%); and with Parkinson disease (20%). Other risk factors include family history of RLS, northern European descent, female sex (2:1 vs male sex), and older age (RLS prevalence of 10% in adults ≥65 years). Restless legs syndrome is diagnosed based on clinical history; polysomnography is not recommended for diagnosis. Iron supplementation with ferrous sulfate (325-650 mg daily or every other day) or intravenous iron (1000 mg) should be initiated for serum ferritin level less than or equal to 100 ng/mL or transferrin saturation less than 20%. If possible, medications associated with RLS, including serotonergic antidepressants, dopamine antagonists, and centrally acting H1 antihistamines (eg, diphenhydramine), should be discontinued. Gabapentinoids (eg, gabapentin, gabapentin enacarbil, pregabalin) are first-line pharmacologic therapy. In randomized clinical trials, approximately 70% of patients treated with gabapentinoids had much or very much improved RLS symptoms vs approximately 40% with placebo (P < .001). Dopamine agonists (eg, ropinirole, pramipexole, rotigotine) are no longer recommended as first-line medications due to the risk of augmentation, an iatrogenic worsening of RLS symptoms, which has an annual incidence of 7% to 10% with these medications. Patients who do not improve with first-line treatment or have augmented RLS often benefit from low-dose opioids (eg, methadone 5-10 mg daily).

Conclusions and Relevance Restless legs syndrome affects approximately 3% of adults and can have negative effects on sleep and quality of life. Initial management includes cessation of exacerbating medications, as well as iron supplementation for patients with low-normal iron indices. If medication therapy is indicated, gabapentinoids are first-line treatment.

Keywords 
Restless Legs Syndrome Restless Leg Sleep-related movement disorder sleep disorders

Intranasal Treatments for Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing: The MIST+ Randomized Clinical Trial

Author/s: 
Gillian M. Nixon, Deborah Anderson, Alice Baker

Importance: Symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea are common in childhood and associated with significant comorbidity. Surgical treatment with adenotonsillectomy is first-line treatment but medical treatments show potential to improve symptoms and reduce the need for surgery.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6 weeks of intranasal steroid (INS) compared with saline in children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) with persistent symptoms after a 6-week intranasal saline run-in.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial involving specialist clinic waitlists at 2 sites in Australia. Included were children aged 3 to 12 years. Study data were analyzed from January to June 2025.

Interventions: All children received once-daily intranasal saline for 6 weeks (run-in). Those with persisting symptoms (SDB score ≥-1) were randomized to either once-daily intranasal mometasone furoate, 50 µg, (INS) or continued saline for a further 6 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was symptom resolution (SDB score <-1). Secondary outcomes included behavior, quality of life, and parental perception of need for surgery. Analyses were adjusted for site and baseline measures.

Results: A total of 150 children (mean [SD] age, 6.2 [2.3] years; 93 male [62%]) were recruited. Of 139 children who completed the run-in phase, 41 (29.5%) had symptom resolution after saline run-in. Among 93 children randomized to intervention groups (47 INS; 46 saline), symptom resolution occurred in 35.6% (95% CI, 22.9%-50.6%) and 36.4% (95% CI, 23.5%-51.6%) of the INS and saline group, respectively, with no evidence for a clinically significant difference between groups (risk difference, -0.9%; 95% CI, -20.7% to 19.0%; P = .93). No group differences were found in secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis did not reveal a group more or less likely to respond to medical treatment.

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial show that 6 weeks of intranasal saline resolved OSDB symptoms in nearly one-third of children. An additional 6-week course of INS or saline led to resolution in another one-third (total resolution around 50%), with no added benefit from INS. Intranasal saline is an effective short-term first-line treatment for OSDB before consideration of polysomnography or surgical intervention. Results suggest that saline should be recommended for 3 months before assessing the need for specialist referral.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05382494.

Keywords 
sleep disorders adolescents Intranasal Treatments sleep apnea

Efficacy and Safety of Seltorexant in Insomnia Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author/s: 
Sofie Mesens, Andrew D Krystal, Rama Melkote, Haiyan Xu, Gahan Pandina, Jay B Saoud, Remy Luthringer, Adam Savitz, Wayne C Drevets

Importance: Existing pharmacological treatments for insomnia have significant limitations.

Objective: To assess the effective dose range, safety, and tolerability of the novel selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist seltorexant in insomnia disorder.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, dose-finding, polysomnography study was conducted from November 2017 to April 2019 at 55 sites in 6 countries and analyzed in August 2019. The timeline for submission of this data for publication was impacted by internal strategic decision-making. Adults (aged 18-64 years) and older adults (aged 65-85 years) with insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index score ≥15) and no psychiatric comorbidity were included.

Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive nightly oral-seltorexant (5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg), placebo, or zolpidem (5-10 mg) for 14 days.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary and key secondary outcomes included the dose-response relationship of night 1 latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and wake after sleep onset over the first 6 hours (WASO-6). Other secondary outcomes included night 13 LPS and WASO-6. Due to asymmetrical distributions of LPS and WASO-6 at baseline, log transformation was applied and results were expressed as back-transformed least-squares mean (LSM) ratios for comparisons between groups.

Results: Overall, 364 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [12.4] years; 246 [67.6%] female) received seltorexant, 5 mg (n = 71), 10 mg (n = 74), or 20 mg (n = 71); placebo (n = 75); or zolpidem (n = 73). The night 1 dose-response relationship for LPS was significant (with trend test t statistics ≥3.99 and adjusted P values <.001 for all 4 prespecified models), with greater improvements in seltorexant, 10 mg and 20 mg, vs placebo (10 mg: LSM ratio, 0.64; 90% CI, 0.51-0.81; 20 mg: LSM ratio, 0.51; 90% CI, 0.41-0.64) and in seltorexant, 20 mg, vs zolpidem (LSM ratio, 0.71; 90% CI, 0.57-0.88). The night 1 dose-response relationship for WASO-6 was also significant, with trend test t statistics ≥3.99 and adjusted P values <.001 for all 4 prespecified models (seltorexant, 10 mg: LSM ratio, 0.68; 90% CI, 0.55-0.85; seltorexant, 20 mg: LSM ratio, 0.60; 90% CI, 0.48-0.74). Night 1 LPS and WASO-6 improvements were maintained on night 13 for seltorexant, 10 mg and 20 mg, but diminished for zolpidem. On night 13, compared with zolpidem, seltorexant, 10 mg and 20 mg, improved LPS by 30% and 28%, respectively, and seltorexant, 20 mg, improved WASO-6 by 31%. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were lower across the combined seltorexant doses (73/216 [33.8%]) relative to placebo (37/75 [49.3%]) and zolpidem (31/73 [42.5%]). Two participants experienced serious TEAEs during the double-blind phase (1 in the seltorexant, 20 mg, group and 1 in the zolpidem group). Three participants in the seltorexant, 5 mg, and 1 in the seltorexant, 20 mg, group experienced asymptomatic electrocardiogram-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation.

Conclusions and relevance: Among participants with insomnia in this study, seltorexant, 10 mg and 20 mg, improved sleep initiation and maintenance throughout 14 days of treatment. Seltorexant was generally well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375203.

Keywords 
sleep medicine neurology Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Seltorexant Insomnia medications sleep disorders
Subscribe to sleep disorders