1. Home
  2. primary care

primary care

Management of Shoulder Pain in Primary Care: A Review

Author/s: 
Romi Haas, Thomas Ibounig, MD, Buchbinder, Rachelle

Importance Shoulder pain is a common and disabling condition most often managed in primary care. This review provides an evidence-based update on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Observations Shoulder pain arises from benign, self-limiting soft-tissue disorders or rare but serious causes. In primary care, most cases are nontraumatic and involve periarticular soft tissues. The subacromial region is the most frequent source of pain, and the term subacromial pain is preferred over overlapping and inconsistently defined labels such as rotator cuff tendinopathy or tear, impingement syndrome, or subacromial bursitis. Less commonly, pain originates from the glenohumeral joint, as in glenohumeral osteoarthritis or adhesive capsulitis. Assessment should focus on a detailed history and physical examination to assess pain patterns and movement limitation and to exclude serious causes, such as infection, malignant neoplasm, or nonshoulder referred pain. Once these are excluded, first-line treatment is similar for most patients and aligns with recommended care for other regional musculoskeletal concerns: education about the favorable natural history, symptom relief and activity modification if needed, and watchful waiting. Early imaging is not indicated in the absence of significant trauma or suspicious features, such as fever, unexplained weight loss, or history of malignant neoplasm, as structural abnormalities often do not correlate with symptoms, rarely alter management, and may lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Specialist referral should be reserved for suspected serious pathology, such as infection, malignant neoplasm, fracture, or dislocation; significant functional or neurologic deficit; features suggestive of systemic inflammatory disease; or persistent or worsening pain and debility. High-certainty evidence indicates that subacromial pain does not benefit from surgical intervention.

Conclusions and Relevance Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal presentation in primary care. Although causes vary, the initial management is largely the same once serious conditions have been excluded. Most patients with subacromial pain will fully recover with minimal intervention and can be safely treated with supportive care. Imaging and referral to surgical subspecialists should be reserved for rare and carefully selected cases to avoid unnecessary intervention.

Keywords 
Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Practice Shoulder Pain pain management primary care physical therapy

Radial Sided Wrist Pain: First Line Diagnostic Approach and Management of Selected Common Pathologies

Author/s: 
Harris, Philipe, René Wittmer, Valois Emilie, Patrick G.

Abstract
Objective To provide a clinical overview of selected common pathologies causing radial-sided wrist pain and to guide primary care physicians in the diagnostic approach and initial management of these conditions.

Sources of information A literature review was conducted using the PubMed MEDLINE database, supplemented by reference musculoskeletal clinical textbooks.

Main message Radial-sided wrist pain has a wide differential diagnosis due to the complex anatomy of the wrist. A thorough clinical evaluation—including detailed history, physical examination, and appropriate imaging—is essential for accurate diagnosis. Several common conditions are presented with diagnostic features, relevant physical examination tests, and an overview of treatment options.

Conclusion Radial-sided wrist pain requires careful clinical assessment to differentiate among multiple pathologies originating from anatomic causes. Primary care physicians can effectively manage many of these conditions with appropriate diagnostic strategies and conservative treatments. Early recognition and targeted interventions can prevent complications and improve patient outcomes.

Musculoskeletal concerns account for about one-fifth to one-quarter of all primary care visits.1,2 Among those, hand and wrist concerns account for 47 to 60 cases per 1000 patients per year.3 Given the large number of anatomic structures in the relatively small volume of the wrist, radial-sided wrist pain can present a diagnostic challenge. We provide a clinical review of selected common hand and wrist pathologies affecting the radial side of the wrist, defined as the region from the distal radius to the mid-first volar and dorsal metacarpal to a line between the radius and ulna to the base of the second metacarpal.

Keywords 
Wrist Pain primary care Diagnostic Approaach

Hypertension and alcohol: a cross-sectional study comparing PEth with AUDIT and AUDIT-C in primary care

Author/s: 
Åsa Thurfjell, Maria Hagströmer, Charlotte Ivarsson, Anders Norrman, Johanna Adami, Lena Lundh, Jan Hasselström

Background: This cross-sectional study aimed to describe proportions of patients with indications of alcohol consumption using phosphatidylethanol (PEth), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and its consumption-focused version (AUDIT-C), in relation to blood pressure (BP) control, overall and by sex.

Methods: A total of 270 hypertensive primary care patients (ICD-10: I10.9) were stratified into BP control groups: controlled (<140/90 mmHg), uncontrolled (≥140/90 mmHg), and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH; ≥140/90 mmHg with ≥3 antihypertensive drugs). A randomized sample from each stratum was invited, baseline data were collected. Alcohol consumption using predefined categories for PEth and AUDIT, and hazardous use (PEth ≥ 0.122 µmol/L; AUDIT ≥ 8; AUDIT-C ≥ 5 for men, ≥4 for women), were analyzed in relation to BP control groups.

Results: Mean age was 67 ± 11 years; 42% were women. PEth indicated high and regular alcohol consumption in 6.4% of controlled, 5.3% of uncontrolled, and 19.2% of aTRH patients (controlled vs. aTRH, P = .027; uncontrolled vs. aTRH, P = .013). AUDIT showed no significant differences in hazardous use between BP groups (P = .865). AUDIT-C identified slightly higher proportions of hazardous use than PEth, across BP groups and sexes. No significant differences were found between BP groups for hazardous use by PEth (P = .339) or AUDIT-C (P = .150).

Conclusions: PEth revealed significantly higher alcohol use in the aTRH group, undetected by AUDIT. AUDIT-C and PEth identified more hazardous use than AUDIT, suggesting their potential to prompt alcohol-related discussions and support evidence-based hypertension care. PEth correlated more strongly with AUDIT-C than with AUDIT.

Clinical trial registration: Retrospectively registered in Clinical Trials, SLSO2022-0143, 2022-12-10.

Keywords: alcohol use disorder; cardiovascular disorders (hypertension/DVT/atherosclerosis); hypertension (high blood pressure); prevention; primary care; screening.

Keywords 
alcohol use disorder cardiovascular disorders hypertension prevention primary care screening

Uniting depression care through generalism: a primary care-informed response to the Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission’s call for action on depression

Author/s: 
Alison Flehr, Christopher Dowrick, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes, Jane Gunn

In this Viewpoint, we respond to the 2022 Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission’s call for united action on depression. We present primary care-focused recommendations synthesised from key outcomes of 16 observational cohorts of adults with depression in primary care, representing more than 26 000 individuals from 26 countries. Identified areas for action included prediction of the depression severity trajectory, the complexity of the depressive experience, and the need for tailored yet holistic depression-care plans. Personal resilience and reductions in social burden were identified as powerful predictors of improved depression outcomes. Aimed at policy makers in primary care, researchers, and primary care providers, our recommendations emphasise a generalist model of care that is person focused and trauma informed. We advocate for increased primary care capacity for depression risk prediction, social support integration, care navigation, and continuity of care. By bridging the gap between primary care and psychiatric knowledge, our recommendations provide actionable guidance for reducing the global burden of depression.

Keywords 
depression primary care social support depression severity severe depression

Epley manoeuvre’s efficacy for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary-care and subspecialty settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author/s: 
Yusuke Saishoji, Norio Yamamoto, Takashi Fujiwara, Hideki Mori, Shunsuke Taito

Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point estimates or certainty of evidence. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis and clarified the efficacy of EM for BPPV, regardless of primary-care and subspecialty settings.

Keywords 
epley maneuvers primary care Clinical benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Approach to nail trauma for primary care physicians

Author/s: 
Knox, Aaron, Lafreniere, Ann-Sophie, Misati , Griffins

Objective: To provide an overview and approach to common nail bed injuries seen by primary care practitioners.

Sources of information: An Ovid MEDLINE literature search was performed using search terms and studies were graded based on level of evidence.

Main message: Nail trauma is common in primary care practice and requires proper and prompt treatment to avoid lasting effects on finger function and cosmesis. When presented with a fingernail injury, primary care physicians should perform a thorough physical examination to determine extent of injury; take a history to rule out notable risk factors; perform a comprehensive neurovascular examination to assess pulp capillary refill, to do a 2-point discrimination, and to compare with an uninjured digit; and evaluate range of motion. Clinical evaluation may require local anesthesia and a tourniquet. Nail bed trauma can present in different ways and includes subungual hematomas, distal phalanx fractures, Seymour fractures, and-in more severe cases-fragmentation or avulsion of the nail bed. Treatment for subungual hematomas where the nail plate is intact does not require nail plate removal and nail bed exploration; however, exploration and repair are indicated for a nail plate injury, a proximal fracture involving the germinal matrix, and a distal phalanx fracture requiring stabilization.

Conclusion: Fingertips are essential to normal hand function. Nail trauma is common and can be managed by primary care physicians. Shared decision making concerning management is based on the mechanism and extent of the injury and aims to prevent secondary deformities.

Keywords 
fingers nails primary care

Screening for primary aldosteronism in primary care

Author/s: 
Dubrofsky, L., Hundemer, G. L.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is common among patients with hypokalemia and hypertension. Patients with PA are at an increased risk of chronic disease if undiagnosed or untreated. Expert consensus recommends screening for PA in high-risk populations. Most antihypertensive medications can be continued during the work-up for PA. An elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio is suggestive of PA.

Keywords 
Hypokalemia Aldosterone primary aldosteronism primary care screening

Women’s health update: A literature review impacting primary care

Author/s: 
Dolan, B. M., Merriam, S., Prifti, C. A., Walsh, J. M.

The authors review studies on key issues in women’s health with potential impact on internal medicine practice. The reviewed articles discuss cardiovascular disease risks, bone health, breast cancer genetics, cervical cancer prevention, depression in the peripartum period, pelvic pain, and emergency contraception.

Keywords 
Women's Health primary care Literature Review Internal Medicine Practice Disease Risks

Evaluation of a Chronic Pain Screening Program Implemented in Primary Care

Author/s: 
Bifulco, L., Anderson, D. R., Blankson, M. L, Channamsetty, V., Blaz, J. W., Nguyen-Louie, T., Scholle, S. H.

Importance: Although pain is among the most common symptoms reported by patients, primary care practitioners (PCPs) face substantial challenges identifying and assessing pain.

Objective: To evaluate a 2-step process for chronic pain screening and follow-up in primary care.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study of patients with a primary care visit between July 2, 2018, and June 1, 2019, was conducted at a statewide, multisite federally qualified health center. Participants included 68 PCPs and 58 medical assistants from 13 sites who implemented the screening process in primary care, and 38 866 patients aged 18 years or older with a primary care visit during that time.

Exposures: Single-question assessment of pain frequency, followed by a 3-question PEG (pain, enjoyment of life, general activity) functional assessment for patients with chronic pain.

Main outcomes and measures: Adherence to a 2-step chronic pain screening and PEG process, proportion of patients with positive screening results, mean PEG pain severity greater than or equal to 7, and documented chronic painful condition diagnosis in patient's electronic health record between 1 year before and 90 days after screening.

Results: Of 38 866 patients with a primary care visit, 31 600 patients (81.3%) underwent screening. Mean (SD) age was 46.2 (15.4) years, and most were aged 35 to 54 years (12 987 [41.1%]), female (18 436 [58.3%]), Hispanic (14 809 [46.9%]), and English-speaking (22 519 [71.3%]), and had Medicaid insurance (18 442 [58.4%]). A total of 10 262 participants (32.5%) screened positive and, of these, 9701 (94.5%) completed the PEG questionnaire. PEG responses indicated severe pain interference with activities of daily living (PEG ≥7) in 5735 (59.1%) participants. A chronic painful condition had not been diagnosed in 4257 (43.9%) patients in the year before screening. A new chronic painful condition was diagnosed at screening or within 90 days in 2250 (52.9%) patients. Care teams found the workflow acceptable, but cited lengthy administration time, challenges with comprehension of the PEG questions, and limited comprehensiveness as implementation barriers.

Conclusions and relevance: A systematic, 2-step process for chronic pain screening and functional assessment in primary care appeared to identify patients with previously undocumented chronic pain and was feasible to implement. Patient-provided information on the frequency of pain, pain level, and pain interference can help improve the assessment and monitoring of pain in primary care.

Keywords 
chronic pain Screening Program primary care Pain Measurement
Subscribe to primary care