medical marijuana

Therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids: an evidence mapping and appraisal of systematic reviews

Author/s: 
Montero-Oleas, N, Arevalo-Rodriguez, I, Nunez-Gonzalez, S, Viteri-Garcia, A, Simancas-Racines, D

Background

Although cannabis and cannabinoids are widely used with therapeutic purposes, their claimed efficacy is highly controversial. For this reason, medical cannabis use is a broad field of research that is rapidly expanding. Our objectives are to identify, characterize, appraise, and organize the current available evidence surrounding therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids, using evidence maps.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, to identify systematic reviews (SRs) published from their inception up to December 2017. Two authors assessed eligibility and extracted data independently. We assessed methodological quality of the included SRs using the AMSTAR tool. To illustrate the extent of use of medical cannabis, we organized the results according to identified PICO questions using bubble plots corresponding to different clinical scenarios.

Results

A total of 44 SRs published between 2001 and 2017 were included in this evidence mapping with data from 158 individual studies. We extracted 96 PICO questions in the following medical conditions: multiple sclerosis, movement disorders (e.g. Tourette Syndrome, Parkinson Disease), psychiatry conditions, Alzheimer disease, epilepsy, acute and chronic pain, cancer, neuropathic pain, symptoms related to cancer (e.g. emesis and anorexia related with chemotherapy), rheumatic disorders, HIV-related symptoms, glaucoma, and COPD. The evidence about these conditions is heterogeneous regarding the conclusions and the quality of the individual primary studies. The quality of the SRs was moderate to high according to AMSTAR scores.

Conclusions

Evidence on medical uses of cannabis is broad. However, due to methodological limitations, conclusions were weak in most of the assessed comparisons. Evidence mapping methodology is useful to perform an overview of available research, since it is possible to systematically describe the extent and distribution of evidence, and to organize scattered data.

Medical Marijuana Overview: Patient Care Considerations for all Primary Care Physicians

Author/s: 
Douglas, Chad

Objectives:

  • Recognize the difference between recommending and prescribing medication in regard to medical marijuana
  • Summarize components of the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Rules and Regulations in regard to patient licensing and physician recommendations
  • Recognize that marijuana is still a Schedule I Controlled Dangerous Substance at the Federal level
  • Differentiate the pharmacology and toxicology of the cannabinoids THC and cannabidiol
  • Recognize potential drug-drug interactions of medical marijuana
  • Implement appropriate counseling of patients who are considering or currently using medical marijuana

Lack of evidence for cannabis in adults with chronic neuropathic pain

Author/s: 
McAvoy, Brian R.

Bottom Line:

There was no high-quality evidence for the efficacy of any CBM (herbal cannabis, plant-derived tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (dronabinol), synthetic THC (nabilone), plant-derived THC/cannabidiol (CBD) com bination) in any condition with chronic neuropathic pain. The studies were two to 26 weeks long and compared an oromucosal spray with a plant-derived combination of THC and CBD (10 studies), a synthetic cannabinoid mimicking THC (nabilone) (two studies), inhaled herbal cannabis (two studies) and plant-derived THC (dronabinol) (two studies) against placebo (15 studies) and an analgesic (dihydrocodeine) (one study). Herbal cannabis was not different from placebo in reducing pain and the number of people who dropped out due to side effects. Some adverse events (particularly somnolence or sedation, confusion, psychosis) might limit the clinical usefulness of cannabis-based medicines.

Don't Get Burned! Legal Issues Associated with Medical Marijuana

Author/s: 
Loomis, Cori H.

In Conclusion

  • Evaluate carefully whether recommending medical marijuana is something you want to do and the risks and requirements associated with it.
  • Prepare and use appropriate informed consent forms and treatment agreements.
  • Notify your medical liability insurance carrier.
  • Check with your employer or facilities at which you have privleges.

Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority: The Nuts & Bolts Physicians Need to Provide a Recommendation

Author/s: 
Heater, Buffy

Overview

  • Provide a brief history and the current status of the program
  • Provide an overview of the regulatory framework regarding physicians
  • Described the physician recommendation and patient application processes
  • Questions and Answers
Subscribe to medical marijuana