1. Home
  2. Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy

Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings in Older Adults With a History of Colorectal Adenomas

Author/s: 
Lee, JK, Roy, A., Jensen, C.D., Chan, J.T., Zhao, W.K.

Importance
Postpolypectomy surveillance is a common colonoscopy indication in older adults; however, guidelines provide little direction on when to stop surveillance in this population.

Objective
To estimate surveillance colonoscopy yields in older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants
This population-based cross-sectional study included individuals 70 to 85 years of age who received surveillance colonoscopy at a large, community-based US health care system between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019; had an adenoma detected 12 or more months previously; and had at least 1 year of health plan enrollment before surveillance. Individuals were excluded due to prior colorectal cancer (CRC), hereditary CRC syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, or prior colectomy or if the surveillance colonoscopy had an inadequate bowel preparation or was incomplete. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, to February 22, 2024.

Exposures
Age (70-74, 75-79, or 80-85 years) at surveillance colonoscopy and prior adenoma finding (ie, advanced adenoma vs nonadvanced adenoma).

Main Outcomes and Measures
The main outcomes were yields of CRC, advanced adenoma, and advanced neoplasia overall (all ages) by age group and by both age group and prior adenoma finding. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with advanced neoplasia detection at surveillance.

Results
Of 9740 surveillance colonoscopies among 9601 patients, 5895 (60.5%) were in men, and 5738 (58.9%), 3225 (33.1%), and 777 (8.0%) were performed in those aged 70-74, 75-79, and 80-85 years, respectively. Overall, CRC yields were found in 28 procedures (0.3%), advanced adenoma in 1141 (11.7%), and advanced neoplasia in 1169 (12.0%); yields did not differ significantly across age groups. Overall, CRC yields were higher for colonoscopies among patients with a prior advanced adenoma vs nonadvanced adenoma (12 of 2305 [0.5%] vs 16 of 7435 [0.2%]; P = .02), and the same was observed for advanced neoplasia (380 of 2305 [16.5%] vs 789 of 7435 [10.6%]; P < .001). Factors associated with advanced neoplasia at surveillance were prior advanced adenoma (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.44-1.88), body mass index of 30 or greater vs less than 25 (AOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.44), and having ever smoked tobacco (AOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30). Asian or Pacific Islander race was inversely associated with advanced neoplasia (AOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99).

Conclusions and Relevance
In this cross-sectional study of surveillance colonoscopy yield in older adults, CRC detection was rare regardless of prior adenoma finding, whereas the advanced neoplasia yield was 12.0% overall. Yields were higher among those with a prior advanced adenoma than among those with prior nonadvanced adenoma and did not increase significantly with age. These findings can help inform whether to continue surveillance colonoscopy in older adults.

Keywords 
Adenoma Colonoscopy older adults

Management of acute diverticulitis

Author/s: 
Zondervan, N., Snelgrove, R., Bradley, N.

1 Emergency department visits and hospital admissions for acute
diverticulitis have increased
Emergency department visits for acute diverticulitis increased by 26.8% to
113.9 visits per 100 000 from 2006 to 2013 in the United States.1
Hospital admissions for diverticulitis increased 7.5% annually from 190 per 100 000 in 2008 to
310 per 100 000 in 2015 in Europe; the increase occurred predominantly among
patients aged younger than 60 years.2 Insufficient consumption of dietary fibre
is associated with this rise.
2 Symptoms of diverticulitis may be driven by inflammation rather
than infection
Contemporary evidence shows that use of antibiotics in uncomplicated cases of
diverticulitis neither accelerates recovery nor improves outcomes.2
A recent
study has suggested that chronic inflammation secondary to environmental risk
factors and alterations of the gut microbiome are now favoured causes over
microperforation or bacterial translocation.3
3 Most patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis can be treated as
outpatients with nonopiate analgesia rather than antibiotics
Cross-sectional imaging that shows inflamed colonic diverticula without perforation or abscess defines uncomplicated diverticulitis. Two randomized controlled trials that compared antibiotic and nonantibiotic treatment reported
no difference in recovery time, treatment duration or rate of recurrence.4,5
Updated guidelines recommend reserving antibiotics for patients taking
immunosuppressive medications and those with sepsis.1,2 Treating symptoms
with nonopiate analgesics avoids worsening bowel function and contributing
to opiate dependence.
4 Evidence of complicated diverticulitis should prompt emergent
surgical assessment and antibiotic treatment
Complicated diverticulitis, defined as radiologic evidence of perforation or intraabdominal abscess, has a 30-day mortality rate of 8.7%.2
Antibiotic therapy is indicated, and many patients require admission to hospital.1
Percutaneous drainage
of large abscesses (> 3 cm) or emergency surgery may be required.2
5 Colonoscopy and elective colon resection are not routinely required
after resolution of uncomplicated diverticulitis
Only 8.7% of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis will present to hospital
with a second episode.1
Elective surgery should be determined by frequency
and severity of symptoms, rather than prevention of future complications.2
Risk of malignant disease after uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis is similar to that of the general population (1%), and standard colon cancer screening guidelines should be followed.1
Complicated diverticulitis warrants an
interval colonoscopy, typically 6 weeks after resolution.1

Keywords 
Colonoscopy abscess Anti-Bacterial Agents Bacterial translocation sepsis

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians

Author/s: 
Qaseem, A., Crandall, C.J., Mustafa, R.A., Hicks, L.A., Wilt, T.J., Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians

DESCRIPTION:

The purpose of this guidance statement is to guide clinicians on colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults.

METHODS:

This guidance statement is derived from a critical appraisal of guidelines on screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults and the evidence presented in these guidelines. National guidelines published in English between 1 June 2014 and 28 May 2018 in the National Guideline Clearinghouse or Guidelines International Network library were included. The authors also included 3 guidelines commonly used in clinical practice. Web sites were searched for guideline updates in December 2018. The AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of guidelines.

TARGET AUDIENCE AND PATIENT POPULATION:

The target audience is all clinicians, and the target patient population is adults at average risk for colorectal cancer.

GUIDANCE STATEMENT 1:

Clinicians should screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults between the ages of 50 and 75 years.

GUIDANCE STATEMENT 2:

Clinicians should select the colorectal cancer screening test with the patient on the basis of a discussion of benefits, harms, costs, availability, frequency, and patient preferences. Suggested screening tests and intervals are fecal immunochemical testing or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing every 2 years, colonoscopy every 10 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 10 years plus fecal immunochemical testing every 2 years.

GUIDANCE STATEMENT 3:

Clinicians should discontinue screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults older than 75 years or in adults with a life expectancy of 10 years or less.

Keywords 
Colonoscopy Early Detection of Cancer
Subscribe to Colonoscopy