Start-Up and Ongoing Practice Expenses of Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration Interventions in the Advancing Care Together (ACT) Program

Author/s: 
Wallace, Neal T., Cohen, Deborah J., Gunn, Rose, Beck, Arne, Melek, Steve, Bechtold, Donald, Green, Larry A.
Date Added: 
October 3, 2018
Journal/Publication: 
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Publisher: 
American Board of Family Medicine
Publication Date: 
September 1, 2015
Issue: 
Supplement 1
Volume: 
28
Pages: 
S86-S97
Format: 
Article
DOI (1): 
10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150052
PMID (1): 
26359476

RPR Commentary

Integration of behavioral health and primary care can be extremely helpful to both patients and clinicians.  This article summarizes lessons learned from those who have accomplished it.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Provide credible estimates of the start-up and ongoing effort and incremental practice expenses for the Advancing Care Together (ACT) behavioral health and primary care integration interventions.

METHODS:

Expenditure data were collected from 10 practice intervention sites using an instrument with a standardized general format that could accommodate the unique elements of each intervention.

RESULTS:

Average start-up effort expenses were $44,076 and monthly ongoing effort expenses per patient were $40.39. Incremental expenses averaged $20,788 for start-up and $4.58 per patient for monthly ongoing activities. Variations in expenditures across practices reflect the differences in intervention specifics and organizational settings. Differences in effort to incremental expenditures reflect the extensive use of existing resources in implementing the interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

ACT program incremental expenses suggest that widespread adoption would likely have a relatively modest effect on overall health systems expenditures. Practice effort expenses are not trivial and may pose barriers to adoption. Payers and purchasers interested in attaining widespread adoption of integrated care must consider external support to practices that accounts for both incremental and effort expense levels. Existing knowledge transfer mechanisms should be employed to minimize developmental start-up expenses and payment reform focused toward value-based, Triple Aim-oriented reimbursement and purchasing mechanisms are likely needed.

Text Availability

Free full text