early detection of cancer

New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines From the US Department of Health and Human Services: Strengthening Women’s Preventive Health

Author/s: 
Brian Christine, Margaret Bush, Anita Thurakal, Ann M Sheehy

Cervical cancer screening is one of the most significant public health accomplishments of the 20th century. Over the last 50 years, incidence and mortality rates from cervical cancer in the US have decreased by more than 50%1 because of widespread use of the Papanicolaou test and later adoption of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing.

Regular screening is critical in detecting disease because women with precancerous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or early-stage cervical cancer are often asymptomatic. When detected early, 5-year cervical cancer survival is higher than 90%.1 Yet more than half of all cervical cancer diagnoses are made beyond an early stage; 37% when cancer has spread regionally to local lymph nodes and 15% when there are distant cancer metastases. Five-year survival is just 20% for women diagnosed with metastatic disease.1

Cervical cytology (Papanicolaou test) and hrHPV tests are highly effective in detecting early, more treatable disease; however, these modalities are only beneficial for women who undergo recommended screening. Unfortunately, about half of all women diagnosed with cervical cancer have never been screened or are not up-to-date on screening,2 and these women are more likely to present with regional or distant metastatic disease. Overall, approximately 1 in 4 women in the US are not up-to-date on cervical cancer screening.3 Women living in poverty or having fewer years of formal education have even lower screening rates. The direct link between screening and survival illustrates a clear and urgent need to improve cervical cancer screening rates in the US; new self-collection options approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provide an opportunity to do so.

What Is Prostate Cancer?

Author/s: 
Rebecca Voelker, MSJ

Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in older men. Prostate cancer typically affects older men (average age at diagnosis is 67 years) and is more common among Black men than White men.1 More than half of prostate cancer risk is due to genetic factors. Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer in men worldwide, with about 1.5 million cases diagnosed in 2021. In the US, 3.4 million men were living with prostate cancer in 2021.

Screening for Breast Cancer

Author/s: 
US Preventive Services Task Force

We all want better ways to find breast cancer early and save lives from this disease. Breast cancer screening can detect cancer early, when it’s most treatable. This guide is meant to help you and your health care professional understand the benefits and risks of breast cancer screening, including what age to start screening and how often people should be screened. This guide is not for women who have a BRCA gene variant, a history of chest radiation, or a personal history of breast cancer. These women should talk to their health care professional about how best to stay healthy.

Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Author/s: 
US Preventive Services Task Force

Importance: Among all US women, breast cancer is the second most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. In 2023, an estimated 43 170 women died of breast cancer. Non-Hispanic White women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and non-Hispanic Black women have the highest mortality rate.

Objective: The USPSTF commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different mammography-based breast cancer screening strategies by age to start and stop screening, screening interval, modality, use of supplemental imaging, or personalization of screening for breast cancer on the incidence of and progression to advanced breast cancer, breast cancer morbidity, and breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality, and collaborative modeling studies to complement the evidence from the review.

Population: Cisgender women and all other persons assigned female at birth aged 40 years or older at average risk of breast cancer.

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that biennial screening mammography in women aged 40 to 74 years has a moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or older and the balance of benefits and harms of supplemental screening for breast cancer with breast ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), regardless of breast density.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 40 to 74 years. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or older. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of supplemental screening for breast cancer using breast ultrasonography or MRI in women identified to have dense breasts on an otherwise negative screening mammogram. (I statement).

American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

Author/s: 
Carolyn D. Runowicz MD, Corinne R. Leach PhD, MS, MPH, N. Lynn Henry MD, PhD, Karen S. Henry MSN

The purpose of the American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendations to assist primary care and other clinicians in the care of female adult survivors of breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, gynecology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nursing was formed and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. A total of 1073 articles met inclusion criteria; and, after full text review, 237 were included as the evidence base. Patients should undergo regular surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, including evaluation with a cancer-related history and physical examination, and should be screened for new primary breast cancer. Data do not support performing routine laboratory tests or imaging tests in asymptomatic patients to evaluate for breast cancer recurrence. Primary care clinicians should counsel patients about the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle, monitor for post-treatment symptoms that can adversely affect quality of life, and monitor for adherence to endocrine therapy. Recommendations provided in this guideline are based on current evidence in the literature and expert consensus opinion. Most of the evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong evidence-based recommendation. Recommendations on surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer and its treatment, health promotion, and care coordination/practice implications are made. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;43–73. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Lung cancer crash course

Author/s: 
Wilkinson, A. N.

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of any cancer in Canada, causing 25.5% of all cancer deaths, with a 5-year survival rate of only 19%. More than half of lung cancers are metastatic at diagnosis, with common sites of metastases in the brain, bone, liver, and adrenal glands. Lung cancer is a heterogeneous group of cancers broadly separated into small cell lung cancer (SCLC)—approximately 15% of all lung cancer cases—and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is further divided into predominantly adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma subtypes. More than 80% of lung cancer cases are related to smoking, meaning smoking cessation remains the cornerstone of lung cancer prevention. Low-dose computed tomography is a valuable screening tool for lung cancer that can identify lung cancers at an earlier stage and reduce lung cancer–specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Although lung cancer screening is recommended by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, it is currently available in only a few Canadian provinces.

What Should I Know About Stopping Routine Cancer Screening?

Author/s: 
Zhang, Grace, Incze, Michael

Cancer screening tests are not perfect. Test results may suggest cancer when there is none (false-positive screen). They can also miss cancer even if it is present (false-negative screen). False-positive results can lead to emotional stress and more testing without improving health. Screening tests may also lead to overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis is when screening tests find slow-growing forms of cancer that would never have caused symptoms or affected health if left undetected.

Cervical cancer screening guideline for individuals at average risk

Author/s: 
Chor, J., Davis, A. M., Rusiecki, J. M.

Major recommendations

Begin screening at age 25 years regardless of sexual history or HPV vaccination status (strong recommendation)

Primary HPV testing every 5 years through age 65 years (strong recommendation)

If primary HPV testing is not available use cotesting (HPV+ cytology) every 5 years or every 3 years if cytology only (strong recommendation)

Discontinue screening at age 65 years if no history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnosis in last 25 years and adequate negative prior screening in last 10 years (qualified recommendation)

Subscribe to early detection of cancer