1. Home
  2. biopsy

biopsy

A “no-biopsy” approach to diagnosing celiac disease

Author/s: 
Mott, T., Gray, C., Storey, J.

PRACTICE CHANGER
CONSIDER A “NO-BIOPSY” APPROACH BY EVALUATING SERUM IMMUNOGLOBULIN (IG) A ANTI-TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE (TTG-IGA) ANTIBODY TITERS IN ADULT PATIENTS WHO PRESENT WITH SYMPTOMS CONCERNING FOR CELIAC DISEASE (CD). AN INCREASE OF ≥ 10 TIMES THE UPPER LIMIT OF NORMAL (ULN) FOR TTG-IGA HAS A POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE (PPV) OF ≥ 95% FOR DIAGNOSING CD WHEN COMPARED WITH ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) WITH DUODENAL BIOPSY—THE CURRENT GOLD STANDARD.

Keywords 
celiac disease Gastroenterology diagnosis Predictive Value of Tests Alternative Approach

Itchy vesicles

Author/s: 
Colom, M., Stulberg, D.

A 58-year-old man presented to the family medicine skin clinic with a 4-month history of intensely pruritic vesicles on his forehead, back, elbows, dorsum of his hands, and knees. The patient also reported lesions inside his mouth; however, they were not visible at the time of the office visit. He had a history of psoriasis and Graves disease and had recently been given a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of celiac disease.

What’s your diagnosis?

Vulvar lichen sclerosus

Author/s: 
Cleminson, K., Baxter, M. L.

An otherwise healthy 71-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a history of pruritus and burning of the vulva. On examination, we observed an atrophic, white, shiny plaque involving the vulva, perineum and perianal areas. The clitoral hood and labia minora were completely scarred and the introitus was narrow (Figure 1). We diagnosed vulvar lichen sclerosus, a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the anogenital area that can present in any age group, though it is most common before puberty and after menopause. We noted no areas of concern for malignant disease, so we did not take a biopsy. We treated the patient with high-potency steroids (clobetasol ointment twice daily for 6 wk, then weekly). She responded well to treatment, and once her disease settled, we switched her to mid-potency steroids (betamethasone valerate 0.1% ointment daily).

Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author/s: 
van der Geest, Kornelis S. M., Sandovici , S., Brouwer, Elisabeth, Mackie, S.L.

Abstract

Importance: Current clinical guidelines recommend selecting diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on pretest probability that the disease is present, but how pretest probability should be estimated remains unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory tests for suspected GCA.

Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 1940 through April 5, 2020.

Study selection: Trials and observational studies describing patients with suspected GCA, using an appropriate reference standard for GCA (temporal artery biopsy, imaging test, or clinical diagnosis), and with available data for at least 1 symptom, physical sign, or laboratory test.

Data extraction and synthesis: Screening, full text review, quality assessment, and data extraction by 2 investigators. Diagnostic test meta-analysis used a bivariate model.

Main outcome(s) and measures: Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs).

Results: In 68 unique studies (14 037 unique patients with suspected GCA; of 7798 patients with sex reported, 5193 were women [66.6%]), findings associated with a diagnosis of GCA included limb claudication (positive LR, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.38-26.16), jaw claudication (positive LR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.74-6.41), temporal artery thickening (positive LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.65-8.33), temporal artery loss of pulse (positive LR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.49-4.23), platelet count of greater than 400 × 103/μL (positive LR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.12-6.64), temporal tenderness (positive LR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.14-8.65), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 100 mm/h (positive LR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.43-6.78). Findings that were associated with absence of GCA included the absence of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 40 mm/h (negative LR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44), absence of C-reactive protein level of 2.5 mg/dL or more (negative LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59), and absence of age over 70 years (negative LR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86).

Conclusions and relevance: This study identifies the clinical and laboratory features that are most informative for a diagnosis of GCA, although no single feature was strong enough to confirm or refute the diagnosis if taken alone. Combinations of these symptoms might help direct further investigation, such as vascular imaging, temporal artery biopsy, or seeking evaluation for alternative diagnoses.

Impact of Biopsy Technique on Clinically Important Outcomes for Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author/s: 
Shellenberger, R.A., Fayyaz, F., Sako, Z., Tawagi, K., Scheidel, C., Nabhan, M.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between the type of biopsy technique employed in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and 4 clinically important outcomes: melanoma-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, Breslow tumor depth, or melanoma recurrence. Our database was obtained by searching PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 6, 2019. Studies were identified that compared biopsy techniques used to diagnose cutaneous melanoma with any of our study outcomes. We included 7 observational studies for our meta-analysis after screening 3231 titles and abstracts. Pooled data identified a significantly higher all-cause mortality in the punch biopsy group (risk ratio [RR], 1.520; P=.02). A higher, but nonsignificant, rate of melanoma-specific mortality (RR, 1.96; P=.22) and melanoma recurrence (RR, 1.20; P=.186) was also found for the punch biopsy group. Breslow tumor thickness was not significantly lower for punch incision (standardized mean difference, −0.42; P=.27). We found limited evidence for differences in clinically important outcomes across the spectrum of the most common methods employed in clinical practice for the initial diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. A small, but significant, increase (P=.02) in all-cause mortality with punch biopsies was not seen for the other outcomes and was most likely due to small sample sizes and demographic differences in the included studies and unlikely represents a clinically important outcome. Our findings support the use of existing clinical practice guidelines for evaluating pigmented lesions suspicious for cutaneous melanoma.

Final Update Summary: Breast Cancer: Medication Use to Reduce Risk

Author/s: 
US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens, Douglas K., Davidson, Karina W., Krist, Alex H., Barry, Michael J., Cabana, M, Caughey, AB, Doubeni, Chyke A., Epling, John W. Jr., Kubik, M, Landefeld, CS, Mangione, Carol M., Pbert, L, Silverstein, Michael, Tseng, Chien-Wen, Wong, JB

IMPORTANCE:

Breast cancer is the most common nonskin cancer among women in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death. The median age at diagnosis is 62 years, and an estimated 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer at some point in their lifetime. African American women are more likely to die of breast cancer compared with women of other races.

OBJECTIVE:

To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on medications for risk reduction of primary breast cancer.

EVIDENCE REVIEW:

The USPSTF reviewed evidence on the accuracy of risk assessment methods to identify women who could benefit from risk-reducing medications for breast cancer, as well as evidence on the effectiveness, adverse effects, and subgroup variations of these medications. The USPSTF reviewed evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and diagnostic accuracy studies of risk stratification models in women without preexisting breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

FINDINGS:

The USPSTF found convincing evidence that risk assessment tools can predict the number of cases of breast cancer expected to develop in a population. However, these risk assessment tools perform modestly at best in discriminating between individual women who will or will not develop breast cancer. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that risk-reducing medications (tamoxifen, raloxifene, or aromatase inhibitors) provide at least a moderate benefit in reducing risk for invasive estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. The USPSTF found that the benefits of taking tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors to reduce risk for breast cancer are no greater than small in women not at increased risk for the disease. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that tamoxifen and raloxifene and adequate evidence that aromatase inhibitors are associated with small to moderate harms. Overall, the USPSTF determined that the net benefit of taking medications to reduce risk of breast cancer is larger in women who have a greater risk for developing breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:

The USPSTF recommends that clinicians offer to prescribe risk-reducing medications, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, or aromatase inhibitors, to women who are at increased risk for breast cancer and at low risk for adverse medication effects. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against the routine use of risk-reducing medications, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, or aromatase inhibitors, in women who are not at increased risk for breast cancer. (D recommendation) This recommendation applies to asymptomatic women 35 years and older, including women with previous benign breast lesions on biopsy (such as atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ). This recommendation does not apply to women who have a current or previous diagnosis of breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

Keywords 
breast cancer risk assessment risk reduction medication
Subscribe to biopsy