motivational interviewing

Combined Pharmacotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Alcohol or Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Brian Desmarais — Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:22:14 +0000

Date Added:

June 22, 2020

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Network Open

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

June 1, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Combined Pharmacotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Alcohol or Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8279

Keywords

substance abuse

treatment

MeSH

motivational interviewing

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

behavior therapy

counseling

The most effective treatment of substance abuse disorders includes the combination of medications and cognitive behavioral therapy. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Abstract

Importance: Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a pressing public health concern. Combined behavioral and pharmacological interventions are considered best practices for addiction. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line intervention, yet the superiority of CBT compared with other behavioral treatments when combined with pharmacotherapy remains unclear. An understanding of the effects of combined CBT and pharmacotherapy will inform best-practice guidelines for treatment of SUD.

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis of the published literature on combined CBT and pharmacotherapy for adult alcohol use disorder (AUD) or other SUDs.

Data sources: PubMed, Cochrane Register, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and Embase databases from January 1, 1990, through July 31, 2019, were searched. Keywords were specified in 3 categories: treatment type, outcome type, and study design. Collected data were analyzed through September 30, 2019.

Study selection: Two independent raters reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. English language articles describing randomized clinical trials examining CBT in combination with pharmacotherapy for AUD and SUD were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Inverse-variance weighted, random-effects estimates of effect size were pooled into 3 clinically informative subgroups: (1) CBT plus pharmacotherapy compared with usual care plus pharmacotherapy, (2) CBT plus pharmacotherapy compared with another specific therapy plus pharmacotherapy, and (3) CBT added to usual care and pharmacotherapy compared with usual care and pharmacotherapy alone. Sensitivity analyses included assessment of study quality, pooled effect size heterogeneity, publication bias, and primary substance moderator effects.

Main outcomes and measures: Substance use frequency and quantity outcomes after treatment and during follow-up were examined.

Results: The sample included 62 effect sizes from 30 unique randomized clinical trials that examined CBT in combination with some form of pharmacotherapy for AUD and SUD. The primary substances targeted in the clinical trial sample were alcohol (15 [50%]), followed by cocaine (7 [23%]) and opioids (6 [20%]). The mean (SD) age of the patient sample was 39 (6) years, with a mean (SD) of 28% (12%) female participants per study. The following pharmacotherapies were used: naltrexone hydrochloride and/or acamprosate calcium (26 of 62 effect sizes [42%]), methadone hydrochloride or combined buprenorphine hydrochloride and naltrexone (11 of 62 [18%]), disulfiram (5 of 62 [8%]), and another pharmacotherapy or mixture of pharmacotherapies (20 of 62 [32%]). Random-effects pooled estimates showed a benefit associated with combined CBT and pharmacotherapy over usual care (g range, 0.18-0.28; k = 9). However, CBT did not perform better than another specific therapy, and evidence for the addition of CBT as an add-on to combined usual care and pharmacotherapy was mixed. Moderator analysis showed variability in effect direction and magnitude by primary drug target.

Conclusions and relevance: The present study supports the efficacy of combined CBT and pharmacotherapy compared with usual care and pharmacotherapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy did not perform better than another evidence-based modality (eg, motivational enhancement therapy, contingency management) in this context or as an add-on to combined usual care and pharmacotherapy. These findings suggest that best practices in addiction treatment should include pharmacotherapy plus CBT or another evidence-based therapy, rather than usual clinical management or nonspecific counseling services.

Author/s:

Ray, L.A., Meredith, L.R., Kiluk, B.D., Walthers, J., Carroll, K.M., Magill, M.

Vaccination of Adults in General Medical Practice

Brian Desmarais — Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:37:26 +0000

Date Added:

January 3, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publication Date:

January 1, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

169–183

URL:

Vaccination of Adults in General Medical Practice

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.024

Keywords

adult immunization

A review of adult immunization recommendations from Mayo. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

In vaccinating adults, clinicians face 2 types of challenges: (1) staying current on recommendations for influenza, pneumococcal, hepatitis A and B, zoster, and other vaccines and (2) addressing systemic barriers to implementing practices that increase vaccination rates. Although adult immunization rates remain suboptimal, there has been much good news in adult vaccination recently. New high-dose and adjuvanted influenza vaccines help improve immune response and may reduce influenza complications in older adults. The new recombinant zoster vaccine offers significantly more efficacy against zoster outbreaks and postherpetic neuralgia than zoster vaccine live. Pertussis vaccine given during the third trimester of pregnancy may prevent between 50% and 90% of pertussis infections in infants. Shorter time for completion (1 vs 6 months) of new, adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine may increase adherence. Clinicians can address systemic barriers to increasing vaccination rates in their clinics and health care systems by following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Standards for Adult Immunization Practice. Clinicians can help increase vaccination rates by writing standing orders and by advocating for nurses or medical assistants to receive training and protected time for assessing and documenting vaccination histories and administration. Strong recommendations that presume acceptance of vaccination are effective with most patients. Communication techniques similar to motivational interviewing can help with vaccine-hesitant patients. Clinicians, as experts on providing preventive services, can educate community leaders about the benefits of immunization and can inform vaccine experts about challenges of implementing vaccination recommendations in clinical practice and strategies that can work to raise vaccination rates.

Author/s:

Hunter, P., Fryhofer, S.A., Szilagyi, P.

Adapting Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Alcohol and Drugs to Culturally Diverse Clinical Populations

Jeffrey Wilson — Wed, 02 Jan 2019 14:20:26 +0000

Date Added:

January 2, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Journal of Addiction Medicine

Publisher:

American Society of Addiction Medicine

Publication Date:

September 1, 2015

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

343-351

URL:

Adapting Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Alcohol and Drugs to Culturally Diverse Clinical Populations

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1097/ADM.0000000000000150

Keywords

alcohol

alcoholism

SBIRT

PMID (1):

26428359

MeSH

community health services

substance-related disorders

alcoholism

alcohol drinking

motivational interviewing

This is a systematic review that provides guidance regarding use of the SBIRT process in culturally diverse patient populations.

Free full text

OBJECTIVES:

To review the literature on the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) approach to alcohol and drug use with racial and ethnic subgroups in the United States and to develop recommendations for culturally competent SBIRT practice.

METHODS:

Articles reporting on the use of SBIRT components (screening, brief intervention, referral to treatment) for alcohol and drug use were identified through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed from 1995 to 2015.

RESULTS:

A synthesis of the published literature on racial and ethnic considerations regarding SBIRT components (including motivational interviewing techniques) was created using evidence-based findings. Recommendations on culturally competent use of SBIRT with specific ethnic groups are also described.

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of the literature reviewed, SBIRT offers a useful set of tools to help reduce risky or problematic substance use. Special attention to validated screeners, appropriate use of language/literacy, trust building, and incorporation of patient and community health care preferences may enhance SBIRT acceptability and effectiveness.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:

Providers should consider the implications of previous research when adapting SBIRT for diverse populations, and use validated screening and brief intervention methods. The accompanying case illustration provides additional information relevant to clinical practice.

Author/s:

Manuel, Jennifer K., Satre, Derek D., Tsoh, Janice, Moreno-John, Gina, Ramos, Jacqueline S., McCance-Katz, Elinore F., Satterfield, Jason M.

Motivational Interviewing and Field Instruction: The FRAMES model

Jeffrey Wilson — Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:38:36 +0000

Date Added:

November 19, 2018

Journal/Publication:

Field Educator

Publisher:

Simmons School of Social Work

Publication Date:

April 1, 2012

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Motivational Interviewing and Field Instruction: The FRAMES model

Type:

Clinical Decision Aids

Format:

Article

Keywords

motivational interviewing

motivation

burnout, professional

MeSH

burnout, professional

motivation

motivational interviewing

alcoholism

FRAMES is a brief intervention technique found to be effective with patients with unhealthy alcohol use.

Free full text

Motivational interviewing is defined as a “client-centered, directive method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence” (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). In supervision of staff, the ultimate goal is to improve an organization’s efficiency by increasing productivity, decreasing employee stress, vicarious trauma and burnout, and reducing clinical negligence and malpractice. In supervision of interns, the major focus is on meeting the intern’s learning needs and on developing competent practitioners. Motivational interviewing in supervision maximizes focus and positive change by developing action plans and addressing ambivalence toward change. Motivational interviewing uses a guide toward change called FRAMES; the acronym stands for Feedback, Responsibility, Advice, Menu Options, Empathy and Self-Efficacy.

Author/s:

Kamya, Hugo

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations

Tracy Ashby — Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

November 12, 2018

Journal/Publication:

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Publication Date:

February 24, 2018

Issue:

URL:

Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines, Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1002/14651858

Keywords

MeSH

motivational interviewing

cognitive therapy

Screening and brief interventions for unhealthy levels of alcohol use in primary care settings are effective for reducing alcohol intake. A number of screening instruments are available. Evidence-based brief interventions have generally included: feedback on the screening outcome plus structured advice about potential risks of heavy drinking and ways to reduce consumption. Effective feedback and advice has taken several forms including: FRAMES, motivational interviewing, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET), Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI), and/or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Some have been backed up by diaries or exercises for the patient to complete at home, and follow-up telephone calls.

Free full text

Background

Excessive drinking is a significant cause of mortality, morbidity and social problems in many countries. Brief interventions aim to reduce alcohol consumption and related harm in hazardous and harmful drinkers who are not actively seeking help for alcohol problems. Interventions usually take the form of a conversation with a primary care provider and may include feedback on the person’s alcohol use, information about potential harms and benefits of reducing intake, and advice on how to reduce consumption. Discussion informs the development of a personal plan to help reduce consumption. Brief interventions can also include behaviour change or motivationally-focused counselling.

This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2007.

Author/s:

Kaner, EFS, Beyer, FR, Muirhead, C, Campbell, F, Pienaar, ED, Bertholet, N, Daeppen, JB, Saunders, JB, Burnand, B