Prostate

What Is Acute Bacterial Prostatitis?
Acute bacterial prostatitis is a urinary tract infection that involves the prostate.1 Patients with acute prostatitis typically have fever, chills, pelvic pain, sudden onset of frequent urination, and pain or burning during urination. Some patients cannot empty their bladder adequately (urinary retention).

Risk factors include medical procedures such as cystoscopy, urethral catheterization, prostate biopsy, urinary obstruction such as benign prostatic hyperplasia and strictures, anal intercourse without condom use, immunosuppression, and certain neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, stroke, and spinal cord injury. Digital rectal examination often reveals prostate swelling and tenderness. The diagnosis of acute bacterial prostatitis is made based on symptoms, urinalysis, and urine culture. First-line treatment is 2 to 4 weeks of antibiotics. Men with urinary retention due to a swollen prostate should have a urinary catheter placed to relieve discomfort and to drain the infected urine.

What Is Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis?
Chronic bacterial prostatitis is a persistent bacterial infection of the prostate despite antibiotic therapy. Patients typically do not have fever or chills, and between episodes of infection they may have no symptoms or have persistent pelvic pain and/or lower urinary tract symptoms.

Risk factors include age 50 years or older, prior acute bacterial prostatitis, urethral surgery or catheterization, anal intercourse without condom use, and genitourinary tuberculosis. The diagnosis is made when multiple urine culture samples grow the same bacterial strain during episodes of urinary tract infection. First-line treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis is at least 4 weeks of oral antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin.

Author/s:

Rebecca Voelker

Prostatitis: A Review

Megan George — Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:07:09 +0000

Date Added:

August 12, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

August 11, 2025

URL:

Prostatitis: A Review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.11499

Keywords

PMID (1):

40788632

MeSH

urinary tract infections

anti-bacterial agents

Escherichia coli

Urinary Retention

A review of our current understanding of prostatitis. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Importance Prostatitis is defined as infection, inflammation, or pain of the prostate gland and affects approximately 9.3% of men in their lifetime.

Observations Acute bacterial prostatitis consists of a urinary tract infection (UTI) that includes infection of the prostate, typically associated with fever or chills and caused by gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, or Pseudomonas, in 80% to 97% of cases. First-line therapy for acute prostatitis is broad-spectrum intravenous or oral antibiotics, such as intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, or oral ciprofloxacin, which has a 92% to 97% success rate when prescribed for 2 to 4 weeks for people with febrile UTI and acute prostatitis. Chronic bacterial prostatitis is defined as a persistent bacterial infection of the prostate, typically presenting as recurrent UTIs from the same strain. Up to 74% of chronic bacterial prostatitis diagnoses are due to gram-negative organisms, such as E coli. First-line therapy for chronic bacterial prostatitis is a minimum 4-week course of levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) presents as pelvic pain or discomfort for at least 3 months and is associated with urinary symptoms, such as urinary frequency. CP/CPPS is diagnosed when evaluation, including history and physical examination, urine culture, and postvoid residual measurement, does not identify other causes for the symptoms, such as infection, cancer, urinary obstruction, or urinary retention. The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) measures symptom severity (scale of 0-43), with a 6-point change considered clinically meaningful. First-line oral therapy for CP/CPPS with urinary symptoms is α-blockers (eg, tamsulosin, alfuzosin; ΔNIH-CPSI score difference vs placebo = −10.8 to −4.8). Other oral therapies are associated with modest changes in NIH-CPSI score compared with placebo, including anti-inflammatory drugs (eg, ibuprofen; ΔNIH-CPSI score difference = −2.5 to −1.7), pregabalin (ΔNIH-CPSI score difference = −2.4), and pollen extract (ΔNIH-CPSI score difference = −2.49).

Conclusions and Relevance Prostatitis includes acute bacterial prostatitis, chronic bacterial prostatitis, and CP/CPPS, each of which is diagnosed and treated differently. First-line treatments are broad-spectrum antibiotics for acute bacterial prostatitis (such as piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, or ciprofloxacin), at least 4 weeks of fluoroquinolones for chronic bacterial prostatitis, and α-blockers for CP/CPPS with urinary symptoms.

Author/s:

Benjamin J Borgert, Eric M Wallen, Minh N Pham

What Is Prostate Cancer?

Megan George — Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:49:16 +0000

Date Added:

July 25, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Patient Page

Publication Date:

July 24, 2025

URL:

What Is Prostate Cancer?

Type:

Patient Education Materials

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.10177

Keywords

Patient Information

jama Patient Information

MeSH

Prostate-Specific Antigen

Digital Rectal Examination

early detection of cancer

Early Detection of Cancer* / methods

Information for patients about prostate cancer. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Prostate cancer is a common malignancy in older men. Prostate cancer typically affects older men (average age at diagnosis is 67 years) and is more common among Black men than White men.1 More than half of prostate cancer risk is due to genetic factors. Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer in men worldwide, with about 1.5 million cases diagnosed in 2021. In the US, 3.4 million men were living with prostate cancer in 2021.

Author/s:

Rebecca Voelker, MSJ

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: A Review

Hope Smashey — Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:34:18 +0000

Date Added:

July 15, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

July 14, 2025

URL:

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: A Review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.7045

Keywords

prostate

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

PMID (1):

40658396

MeSH

Urinary Bladder

Overactive

Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Finasteride

Tadalafil

Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Urinary Retention

cholinergic antagonists

Prostate

Nocturia

Hematuria

Urinary Bladder Calculi

pelvic floor

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

An evidence-based review of lower urinary symptoms in men. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Importance: Up to 40% of men older than 50 years have lower urinary tract symptoms, including urinary urgency, nocturia, and weak urinary stream, due to disorders of the bladder and prostate. These symptoms negatively affect quality of life and may be associated with urinary retention, which can cause kidney insufficiency, bladder calculi, hematuria, and urinary tract infections.

Observations: In men, lower urinary tract symptoms can be caused by bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), an overactive bladder detrusor (a syndrome of urinary urgency and frequency), or both. Behavioral therapy, including pelvic floor physical therapy, timed voiding (voiding at specific intervals), and fluid restriction, can improve symptoms. Medications including α-blockers (such as tamsulosin), 5α-reductase inhibitors (such as finasteride), and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (such as tadalafil) improve lower urinary tract symptoms (mean improvement, 3-10 points on the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], which ranges from 0-35, with higher scores indicating greater severity) and can prevent symptom worsening measured by increased IPSS greater than or equal to 4 points or development of secondary sequelae, such as urinary retention. Combination therapies are more effective than monotherapy. For example, α-blockade (eg, tamsulosin) combined with 5α-reductase inhibition (eg, finasteride) lowers progression risk to less than 10% compared with 10% to 15% with monotherapy. Treatment for overactive bladder detrusor, including anticholinergics (eg, trospium) and β3 agonists (eg, mirabegron), reduces voiding frequency by 2 to 4 times per day and reduces episodes of urinary incontinence by 10 to 20 times per week. Surgery (eg, transurethral resection of the prostate, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) and minimally invasive surgery are highly effective for refractory or complicated cases of BPH, defined as persistent symptoms despite behavioral and pharmacologic therapy, and these therapies can improve IPSS by 10 to 15 points. Minimally invasive procedures, such as water vapor therapy (endoscopic injection of steam into BPH tissue) and prostatic urethral lift (endoscopic insertion of nonabsorbable suture implants that mechanically open the urethra), have lower complication rates of incontinence (0%-8%), erectile dysfunction (0%-3%), and retrograde ejaculation (0%-3%) but are associated with increased need for surgical retreatment (3.4%-21%) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (5%) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (3.3%).

Conclusions and relevance: Lower urinary tract symptoms, defined as urinary urgency, nocturia, or weak stream, are common among men and are usually caused by BPH, overactive bladder detrusor, or both. First-line therapy consists of behavioral intervention, such as pelvic floor physical therapy and timed voiding, as well as pharmacologic therapy, including α-adrenergic blockers (tamsulosin), 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (tadalafil), anticholinergics (trospium), and β3 agonists (mirabegron).

Author/s:

John T Wei, Casey A Dauw, Casey N Brodsky

Prostate Cancer: A Review

Erin Blanchette — Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:19:16 +0000

Date Added:

March 12, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

March 10, 2025

URL:

Prostate Cancer: A Review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.0228

Keywords

prostate

prostate cancer

adenocarcinoma

PMID (1):

40063046

MeSH

Prostate-Specific Antigen

An evidence-based review of our current understanding of prostate cancer. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in men in the US, with an estimated 299 010 new cases and 35 250 deaths in 2024. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, with 1 466 680 new cases and 396 792 deaths in 2022.

Observations: The most common type of prostate cancer is adenocarcinoma (≥99%), and the median age at diagnosis is 67 years. More than 50% of prostate cancer risk is attributable to genetic factors; older age and Black race (annual incidence rate, 173.0 cases per 100 000 Black men vs 97.1 cases per 100 000 White men) are also strong risk factors. Recent guidelines encourage shared decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. At diagnosis, approximately 75% of patients have cancer localized to the prostate, which is associated with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Based on risk stratification that incorporates life expectancy, tumor grade (Gleason score), tumor size, and PSA level, one-third of patients with localized prostate cancer are appropriate for active surveillance with serial PSA measurements, prostate biopsies, or magnetic resonance imaging, and initiation of treatment if the Gleason score or tumor stage increases. For patients with higher-risk disease, radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy are reasonable options; treatment decision-making should include consideration of adverse events and comorbidities. Despite definitive therapy, 2% to 56% of men with localized disease develop distant metastases, depending on tumor risk factors. At presentation, approximately 14% of patients have metastases to regional lymph nodes. An additional 10% of men have distant metastases that are associated with a 5-year survival rate of 37%. Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer primarily relies on androgen deprivation therapy, most commonly through medical castration with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. For patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, the addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (eg, darolutamide, abiraterone) improves survival. Use of abiraterone improved the median overall survival from 36.5 months to 53.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.56-0.78]) compared with medical castration alone. Chemotherapy (docetaxel) may be considered, especially for patients with more extensive disease.

Conclusions and relevance: Approximately 1.5 million new cases of prostate cancer are diagnosed annually worldwide. Approximately 75% of patients present with cancer localized to the prostate, which is associated with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Management includes active surveillance, prostatectomy, or radiation therapy, depending on risk of progression. Approximately 10% of patients present with metastatic prostate cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of 37%. First-line therapies for metastatic prostate cancer include androgen deprivation and novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, and chemotherapy for appropriate patients.

Author/s:

Ruben Raychaudhuri, Daniel W Lin, R Bruce Montgomery

Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment

Aubrey Delammermore — Wed, 05 Apr 2023 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

April 5, 2023

Journal/Publication:

New England Journal of Medicine

Publisher:

Massachusetts Medical Society

Publication Date:

March 11, 2023

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Patient-Reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1056/EVIDoa2300018

Keywords

Androgens

Prostatectomy

Patient Reported Outcome Measures

MeSH

Evidence of long-term quality of life-relevant outcome after various treatments for localized prostate cancer from an RCT. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Long-term patient-reported outcomes are needed to inform treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS
Patient-reported outcomes of 1643 randomly assigned participants in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial were evaluated to assess the functional and quality-of-life impacts of prostatectomy, radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, and active monitoring. This article focuses on the outcomes of the randomly assigned participants from 7 to 12 years using mixed effects linear and logistic models.

RESULTS
Response rates exceeded 80% for most measures. Among the randomized groups over 7 to 12 years, generic quality-of-life scores were similar. Among those in the prostatectomy group, urinary leakage requiring pads occurred in 18 to 24% of patients over 7 to 12 years, compared with 9 to 11% in the active monitoring group and 3 to 8% in the radiotherapy group. In the prostatectomy group, 18% reported erections sufficient for intercourse at 7 years, compared with 30% in the active monitoring and 27% in the radiotherapy groups; all converged to low levels of potency by year 12. Nocturia (voiding at least twice per night) occurred in 34% in the prostatectomy group compared with 48% in the radiotherapy group and 47% in the active monitoring group at 12 years. Fecal leakage affected 12% in the radiotherapy group compared with 6% in the other groups by year 12. The active monitoring group experienced gradual age-related declines in sexual and urinary function, avoiding radical treatment effects unless they changed management.

CONCLUSIONS
ProtecT provides robust evidence about continued impacts of treatments in the long term. These data allow patients newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and their clinicians to assess the trade-offs between treatment harms and benefits and enable better informed and prudent treatment decisions. (Funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme projects 96/20/06 and 96/20/99; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN20141297; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172.)

Author/s:

Donovan, J. L., Hamdy, F. C., Lane, J. A., Young, G. J., Metcalfe, C., Walsh, E. I., Davis, M., Steuart-Feilding, T., Blazeby, J. M., Avery, K. N., Martin, R. M., Bollina, P., Doble, A., Doherty, A., Gillatt, D., Gnanapragasam, V., Hughes, O., Kockelbergh, R., Kynaston, H., Paul, A., Paez, E., Powell, P., Rosariom D. J., Rowe, E., Manson, M., Catto, J. W., Peters, T. J., Wade, J., Turner, E. L., Williams, N. J., Oxley, J., Staffurth, J., Bryant, R. J., Neal, D. E.