Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is caused by CPP crystal accumulation in musculoskeletal tissues, leading to inflammation
Symptomatic CPPD disease (formerly known as “pseudogout”) is more common in older than younger adults and typically affects joints with previous damage. Chondrocalcinosis visible on radiographs affects 10% of adults and 50% of those older than 80 years, but most people are asymptomatic and findings are noted incidentally.1

The most common presentation is acute inflammatory monoarthritis affecting the wrists or knees, which resolves within 4 weeks
Extra-articular structures can also be affected, leading to acute inflammatory tendinitis. Crowned dens syndrome comprises 5% of CPPD disease presentations and can mimic bacterial meningitis, manifesting with acute cervical neck pain, fever, and elevated inflammatory markers with CPPD at C1 to C2, seen on computed tomography. The chronic (> 3 mo) inflammatory phenotype presents with hand or wrist symmetric polyarthritis, or with recurrent flares, and can be misdiagnosed as seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease and osteoarthritis can co-exist — underlying CPPD disease should be considered in patients with osteoarthritis at atypical locations (e.g., metacarpophalangeal joints, wrists, ankles, shoulders, elbows).2

Diagnosis can be confirmed with CPP crystals identified from synovial fluid, or the presence of the crowned dens syndrome
Although used for research, the 2023 Classification Criteria have high sensitivity (99.2%) and specificity (92.5%), thereby providing a diagnostic framework.2 Supportive diagnostic features include acute knee or wrist inflammatory arthritis in an older adult, osteoarthritis at atypical areas, or CPPD on imaging.3

Patients younger than 60 years at diagnosis should be assessed for associated metabolic diseases
Investigations for secondary causes of CPPD disease include calcium (hypercalcemia), parathyroid hormone (hyperparathyroidism), ferritin, transferrin saturation (hemochromatosis), magnesium (hypomagnesemia), and alkaline phosphatase (hypophosphatasia).2

Corticosteroids, colchicine, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs can treat acute flares4
Inflammatory arthritis lasting more than 3 months or recurrent flares (> 2/yr) should prompt rheumatology referral for consideration of chronic suppressive colchicine, hydroxychloroquine, or methotrexate (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.250933/tab-related-content).5

Author/s:

Timothy S.H. Kwok, Gregory Choy

Vitamin D and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in People With Prediabetes : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data From 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Aubrey Delammermore — Thu, 23 Feb 2023 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

February 23, 2023

Journal/Publication:

Annals of Internal Medicine

Publisher:

American College of Physicians

Publication Date:

February 7, 2023

URL:

Vitamin D and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in People With Prediabetes : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data From 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

0.7326/M22-3018

Keywords

Kidney

Cholecalciferol

Intention to Treat Analysis

type 2 diabetes

Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

PMID (1):

36745886

MeSH

diabetes mellitus, type 2

In patients with prediabetes, Vitamin D supplementation appears to improve blood glucose levels and reduce progression to diabetes. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: The role of vitamin D in people who are at risk for type 2 diabetes remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate whether administration of vitamin D decreases risk for diabetes among people with prediabetes.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception through 9 December 2022.

Study selection: Eligible trials that were specifically designed and conducted to test the effects of oral vitamin D versus placebo on new-onset diabetes in adults with prediabetes.

Data extraction: The primary outcome was time to event for new-onset diabetes. Secondary outcomes were regression to normal glucose regulation and adverse events. Prespecified analyses (both unadjusted and adjusted for key baseline variables) were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Data synthesis: Three randomized trials were included, which tested cholecalciferol, 20 000 IU (500 mcg) weekly; cholecalciferol, 4000 IU (100 mcg) daily; or eldecalcitol, 0.75 mcg daily, versus matching placebos. Trials were at low risk of bias. Vitamin D reduced risk for diabetes by 15% (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.96]) in adjusted analyses, with a 3-year absolute risk reduction of 3.3% (CI, 0.6% to 6.0%). The effect of vitamin D did not differ in prespecified subgroups. Among participants assigned to the vitamin D group who maintained an intratrial mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of at least 125 nmol/L (≥50 ng/mL) compared with 50 to 74 nmol/L (20 to 29 ng/mL) during follow-up, cholecalciferol reduced risk for diabetes by 76% (hazard ratio, 0.24 [CI, 0.16 to 0.36]), with a 3-year absolute risk reduction of 18.1% (CI, 11.7% to 24.6%). Vitamin D increased the likelihood of regression to normal glucose regulation by 30% (rate ratio, 1.30 [CI, 1.16 to 1.46]). There was no evidence of difference in the rate ratios for adverse events (kidney stones: 1.17 [CI, 0.69 to 1.99]; hypercalcemia: 2.34 [CI, 0.83 to 6.66]; hypercalciuria: 1.65 [CI, 0.83 to 3.28]; death: 0.85 [CI, 0.31 to 2.36]).

Limitations: Studies of people with prediabetes do not apply to the general population. Trials may not have been powered for safety outcomes.

Conclusion: In adults with prediabetes, vitamin D was effective in decreasing risk for diabetes.

Primary funding source: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42020163522).

Author/s:

Pittas, A. G., Kawahara, T., Jorde, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Vickery, E. M., Angellotti, E., Nelson, J., Trikalinos, T. A., Balk, E. M.