Young Adults

This is the best evidence we have to date regarding the benefits of, or lack thereof, of treatment of localized prostate cancer. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background

Between 1999 and 2009 in the United Kingdom, 82,429 men between 50 and 69 years of age received a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2664 men. Of these men, 1643 were enrolled in a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, with 545 randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, 553 to undergo prostatectomy, and 545 to undergo radiotherapy.
Methods

At a median follow-up of 15 years (range, 11 to 21), we compared the results in this population with respect to death from prostate cancer (the primary outcome) and death from any cause, metastases, disease progression, and initiation of long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (secondary outcomes).
Results

Follow-up was complete for 1610 patients (98%). A risk-stratification analysis showed that more than one third of the men had intermediate or high-risk disease at diagnosis. Death from prostate cancer occurred in 45 men (2.7%): 17 (3.1%) in the active-monitoring group, 12 (2.2%) in the prostatectomy group, and 16 (2.9%) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.53 for the overall comparison). Death from any cause occurred in 356 men (21.7%), with similar numbers in all three groups. Metastases developed in 51 men (9.4%) in the active-monitoring group, in 26 (4.7%) in the prostatectomy group, and in 27 (5.0%) in the radiotherapy group. Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy was initiated in 69 men (12.7%), 40 (7.2%), and 42 (7.7%), respectively; clinical progression occurred in 141 men (25.9%), 58 (10.5%), and 60 (11.0%), respectively. In the active-monitoring group, 133 men (24.4%) were alive without any prostate cancer treatment at the end of follow-up. No differential effects on cancer-specific mortality were noted in relation to the baseline PSA level, tumor stage or grade, or risk-stratification score. No treatment complications were reported after the 10-year analysis.
Conclusions

After 15 years of follow-up, prostate cancer–specific mortality was low regardless of the treatment assigned. Thus, the choice of therapy involves weighing trade-offs between benefits and harms associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297. opens in new tab; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172. opens in new tab.)

Author/s:

Hamdy, Freddie, Donovan, Jenny, Lane, Athene, Metcalfe, Chris, Davis, Michael, Turner, Emma, Martin, Richard, Young, Grace, Walsh, Eleanor, Bryant, Bollina, Prasad, Doble, Andrew

Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Saige Blanchard — Thu, 16 Sep 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

September 16, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publisher:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publication Date:

September 14, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

326

Pages:

949-956

URL:

Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.14081

Keywords

Chlamydia

gonorrhea

Recommendation Statement

Sexually Transmitted Infection

Young Adults

PMID (1):

34519796

MeSH

adolescent

gonorrhea

Urethritis

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Updated recommendations regarding routine screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in women. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Chlamydia and gonorrhea are among the most common sexually transmitted infections in the US. Infection rates are highest among adolescents and young adults of both sexes. Chlamydial and gonococcal infections in women are usually asymptomatic and may lead to pelvic inflammatory disease and its associated complications. Newborns of pregnant persons with untreated infection may develop neonatal chlamydial pneumonia or gonococcal or chlamydial ophthalmia. Infection in men may lead to urethritis and epididymitis. Both types of infection can increase risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV.

Objective: To update its 2014 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in sexually active adolescents and adults, including pregnant persons.

Population: Asymptomatic, sexually active adolescents and adults, including pregnant persons.

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for chlamydia in all sexually active women 24 years or younger and in women 25 years or older who are at increased risk for infection has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for gonorrhea in all sexually active women 24 years or younger and in women 25 years or older who are at increased risk for infection has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in men.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for chlamydia in all sexually active women 24 years or younger and in women 25 years or older who are at increased risk for infection. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for gonorrhea in all sexually active women 24 years or younger and in women 25 years or older who are at increased risk for infection. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in men. (I statement).

Author/s:

M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., Krist, A. H., Kubik, Li, L., Ogedegbe, G., Pbert, Silverstein, Simon, M. A., Stevermer, J., Tseng, C., Wong, J. B.

Trajectories of Opioid Use Following First Opioid Prescription in Opioid-Naive Youths and Young Adults

Devin Evans — Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 19, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open

Publication Date:

April 1, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Trajectories of Opioid Use Following First Opioid Prescription in Opioid-Naive Youths and Young Adults

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4552

Keywords

PMID (1):

33885777

MeSH

opioid-related disorders

prescriptions

Very interesting study showing two distinct patterns of opioid use behaviors among adolescents after being given a first opioid prescription for pain. Predictors of subsequent misuse were identified. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Although prescription opioids are the most common way adolescents and young adults initiate opioid use, many studies examine population-level risks following the first opioid prescription. There is currently a lack of understanding regarding how patterns of opioid prescribing following the first opioid exposure may be associated with long-term risks.

Objective: To identify distinct patterns of opioid prescribing following the first prescription using group-based trajectory modeling and examine the patient-, clinician-, and prescription-level factors that may be associated with trajectory membership during the first year.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study examined Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees' claims data from 2010 through 2016. Participants were aged 10 to 21 years at time of first opioid prescription. Data analysis was performed in March 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: This study used group-based trajectory modeling and defined trajectory status by opioid fill.

Results: Among the 189 477 youths who received an initial opioid prescription, 107 562 were female (56.8%), 81 915 were non-Latinx White (59.6%), and the median age was 16.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 14.6-18.8) years. During the subsequent year, 47 477 (25.1%) received at least one additional prescription. Among the models considered, the 2-group trajectory model had the best fit. Of those in the high-risk trajectory, 65.3% (n = 901) filled opioid prescriptions at month 12, in contrast to 13.1% (n = 6031) in the low-risk trajectory. Median age among the high-risk trajectory was 19.0 years (IQR, 17.1-20.0 years) compared with the low-risk trajectory (17.8 years [IQR, 15.8-19.4 years]). The high-risk trajectory received more potent prescriptions compared with the low-risk trajectory (median dosage of the index month for high-risk trajectory group: 10.0 MME/d [IQR, 5.0-21.2 MME/d] vs the low-risk trajectory group: 4.7 MME/d [IQR, 2.5-7.8 MME/d]; P < .001). The trajectories showed persistent differences with more youths in the high-risk trajectory going on to receive a diagnosis of opioid use disorder (30.0%; n = 412) compared with the low-risk group (10.1%; n = 4638) (P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This study's results identified 2 trajectories associated with elevated risk for persistent opioid receipt within 12 months following first opioid prescription. The high-risk trajectory was characterized by older age at time of first prescription, and longer and more potent first prescriptions. These findings suggest even short and low-dose opioid prescriptions can be associated with risks of persistent use for youths.

Author/s:

Wilson, J.D., Zbebe, K.Z., Kraemer, K., Liebschutz, J., Merlin, J., Miller, E., D., Donohue, J.