Nocturnal hypoglycemia is underdiagnosed in older people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: The HYPOAGE observational study

A significant number of people with insulin-requiring diabetes over 75 years of age having nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes. The sole purpose of treatment in most patients of that age is symptom control due to osmotic diuresis, which doesn't require A1c levels of 7.5% or less. "First, do no harm." James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: There is a lack of real-life data regarding the frequency and predictive factors of hypoglycemia in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to determine the frequency and predictors of hypoglycemia in older patients with insulin-treated T2D.

Methods: This prospective multicenter study included 155 insulin-treated T2D patients aged 75 years and older with ≥2 self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) daily controls. Participants underwent a geriatric and diabetic assessment and received ambulatory blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 28 consecutive days with FreeStyle Libre Pro® sensor. Study population (n = 141) has >70% CGM active time. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with SMBG confirmed hypoglycemia (≥70 mg/dL) and with nocturnal level 2 time below range (glucose concentration <54 mg/dL during ≥15 consecutive min between 0.00 and 6.00 am).

Results: The mean age of the 141 analyzed patients was 81.5 ± 5.3 years and 56.7% were male. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% ± 1.0%. After geriatric assessment, 102 participants (72.3%) were considered as complex and 39 (27.7%) as healthy. The primary endpoint (confirmed SMBG <70 mg/dL) occurred in 37.6% patients. In multivariable analysis, the risk of SMBG-confirmed hypoglycemia was positively associated with a longer duration of diabetes (OR (+1 year) =1.04, (1.00-1.08), p = 0.04) and glycemic variability assessed by CGM (CV %) (OR (+1%) = 1.12, [1.05-1.19], p = <0.001). Nighty-two patients (65.2%) experienced nocturnal time in hypoglycemia (i.e., <54 mg/dL during ≥15 consecutive min between midnight and 6 a.m.). In multivariable analyses, cognitive impairment (OR: 9.31 [2.59-33.4]), heart failure (OR: 4.81 [1;48-15.6]), and depressive disorder (OR: 0.19 [0.06-0.53]) were associated with nocturnal time in hypoglycemia.

Conclusion: Nocturnal hypoglycemia is very common and largely underdiagnosed in older patients with insulin-treated T2D. CGM is a promising tool to better identify hypoglycemia and adapt diabetes management in this population.

Author/s:

Boureau, A., Guyomarch, B., Gourdy, P., Allix, I., Annweiler, C., Cervantes, N., Chapelet, G., Delabriere, I., Guyonnet, S., Litke, R., Paccalin, M., Penfornis, A., Saulnier, P., Wargny, M., Hadjadj, S., de Decker, L., Cariou, B.

Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Synopsis of the 2020 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline

Devin Evans — Wed, 11 Nov 2020 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

November 11, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Annals of Internal Medicine

Publication Date:

November 10, 2020

URL:

Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Synopsis of the 2020 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.7326/M20-5938

Keywords

chronic kidney disease

type 2 diabetes

Kidneys

PMID (1):

33166222

MeSH

delivery of health care

Integrated

This is a new guideline from the Kidney Disease – Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group on management of diabetes in people with chronic kidney disease. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Description: The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organization developed a clinical practice guideline in 2020 for the management of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: The KDIGO Work Group (WG) was tasked with developing the guideline for diabetes management in CKD. It defined the scope of the guideline, gathered evidence, determined systematic review topics, and graded evidence that had been summarized by an evidence review team. The English-language literature searches, which were initially done through October 2018, were updated in February 2020. The WG used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to appraise evidence and rate the strength of the recommendations. Expert judgment was used to develop consensus practice points supplementary to the evidence-based graded recommendations. The guideline document underwent open public review. Comments from various stakeholders, subject matter experts, and industry and national organizations were considered before the document was finalized.

Recommendations: The guideline includes 12 recommendations and 48 practice points for clinicians caring for patients with diabetes and CKD. This synopsis focuses on the key recommendations pertinent to the following issues: comprehensive care needs, glycemic monitoring and targets, lifestyle interventions, antihyperglycemic therapies, and educational and integrated care approaches.

Author/s:

Navaneethan, Sankar D., Zougas, Sophia, Caramori, M.L., Chan, Juliana C.N., Heerspink, Hiddo J.L., Hurst, Clint, Liew, Adrian, Michos, Erin D., Olowu, Wasiu A., Sadusky, Tami, Tandon, Nikhil, Tuttle, Katherine R., Wanner, Christoph, Wilkens, Katy G., Lytvyn, Lyubov, Craig, Jonathan C., Tunnicliffe, David J., Howell, Martin, Tonelli, Marcello, Cheung, Michael, Earley, Amy, Rossing, Peter, De Boer, Ian H., Khunti, Kamlesh