conservative treatment

Importance Hemorrhoidal disease, pathology of the tissue lining of the anal canal, affects approximately 10 million individuals in the US. Hemorrhoidal disease may impair quality of life due to bleeding, pain, anal irritation, and tissue prolapse.

Observations Hemorrhoids are classified as internal, external, or mixed (concurrent internal and external hemorrhoidal disease). Internal hemorrhoids originate above the dentate line, the boundary between the upper and lower anal canal, and may cause rectal bleeding, discomfort, and tissue prolapse from the anal canal. Internal hemorrhoid prolapse is classified as grade I (into anal canal), grade II (beyond the anus with spontaneous reduction), grade III (requiring manual reduction), and grade IV (irreducible). External hemorrhoids, arising below the dentate line, cause rectal pain when engorged or thrombosed. Initial treatment of all hemorrhoidal disease involves increasing intake of dietary fiber and water and avoiding straining during defecation. Phlebotonics (eg, flavonoids [thought to improve venous tone]) reduce bleeding, rectal pain, and swelling, although symptom recurrence reaches 80% within 3 to 6 months after treatment cessation. If dietary modification and phlebotonics are ineffective, grade I to grade III internal hemorrhoidal disease can be treated with office-based interventions. Rubber band ligation—placing a band around the base of hemorrhoid tissue during anoscopy to restrict blood flow—resolves symptoms in 89% of patients, but repeated banding is needed in up to 20%. Sclerotherapy, which induces fibrosis with a sclerosant injection, is efficacious in the short term (weeks to months) among 70% to 85% of patients, but long-term remission occurs in only one-third of patients. Infrared coagulation uses heat to coagulate hemorrhoidal tissue, yielding 70% to 80% success in reducing bleeding and prolapse. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy, for disease unresponsive to office-based therapy or for mixed hemorrhoidal disease, achieves low recurrence (2%-10%), although with longer recovery (9-14 days). External hemorrhoidal disease rarely requires surgery unless acutely thrombosed. Outpatient clot evacuation within 72 hours of onset of a thrombosed external hemorrhoid is associated with decreased pain and reduced risk of repeat thrombosis. Patients presenting more than 72 hours after external hemorrhoid acute thrombosis should receive medical treatment (eg, stool softeners, oral and topical analgesics such as 5% lidocaine).

Conclusions and Relevance Hemorrhoidal disease affects 10 million people in the US. First-line treatment is increased fiber intake, avoidance of straining during defecation, and phlebotonics. In-office rubber band ligation for grade I to III internal hemorrhoid disease is first-line procedural treatment for persistent symptoms despite conservative therapies. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy is recommended for grade III to IV prolapse, thrombosis, or mixed hemorrhoidal disease that does not improve with less invasive approaches.

Author/s:

Jean H. Ashburn

Early Invasive or Conservative Strategies for Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis

Hope Smashey — Tue, 01 Jul 2025 19:20:08 +0000

Date Added:

July 1, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Intern Medicine

Publication Date:

June 23, 2025

URL:

Early Invasive or Conservative Strategies for Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2058

Keywords

PMID (1):

40549394

MeSH

acute coronary syndrome

conservative treatment

myocardial infarction

heart failure

stroke

aged

In patients over the age of 70 who experience a heart attack, it appears that non-intervention is as good as early intervention considering the increased risk of bleeding. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: The optimal management strategy for older patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unclear due to a paucity of randomized evidence. New large and longer-term randomized data are available.

Objective: To test the association of an early invasive strategy vs a conservative strategy with clinical outcomes for patients 70 years or older who present with ACS.

Data sources: A literature search strategy was designed in collaboration with a medical librarian. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched ,with no language restrictions from inception through October 2024. Bibliographies of previous reviews and conference abstracts from major cardiovascular scientific meetings were handsearched.

Study selection: Studies were deemed eligible following review by 2 independent, masked investigators if they randomly allocated patients 70 years or older who presented with ACS to early invasive or conservative management and reported clinical end points. Observational analyses were excluded. No trials were excluded based on sample size or follow-up duration.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted independently and in triplicate. Clinical end points were pooled in meta-analyses that applied fixed-effects and random-effects modeling to calculate summary estimates for relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios, along with their corresponding 95% CIs.

Main outcomes and measures: The prespecified primary end point was all-cause death. Secondary end points included recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeated coronary revascularization, major bleeding, cardiovascular death, death or MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, and length of hospital stay.

Results: The sample size-weighted mean age of participants across included trials was 82.6 years, and 46% were female. In the pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in all-cause death between the invasive and conservative strategies (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.11; P = .15; I2 = 0%). An early invasive strategy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent MI of 22% (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; P = .001; I2 = 0%) and repeated coronary revascularization during follow-up of 57% (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60; P < .001; I2 = 33.3%). However, an invasive strategy was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.53; P = .05; I2 = 16.7). No differences were observed in secondary end points. Results in the non-ST-elevation ACS population were consistent with the overall findings.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that, in older patients with ACS, an early invasive strategy was not associated with reduced all-cause death compared with conservative management. An early invasive strategy was associated with reduced recurrent MI and repeated coronary revascularization during follow-up but increased risk of major bleeding. Competing risks associated with an early invasive strategy should be weighed in shared therapeutic decision-making for older patients with ACS.

Author/s:

Rohin K Reddy, David Koeckerling, Christian Eichhorn, Yasser Jamil, Maddalena Ardissino, Volker Braun, Haitham Abu Sharar, Norbert Frey, James P Howard, Yousif Ahmad

Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Older Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Alex Haga — Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:51:29 +0000

Date Added:

March 31, 2025

Journal/Publication:

J Am Geriatr Soc .

Publication Date:

March 26, 2025

URL:

Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment Strategy in Older Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1111/jgs.19447

Keywords

NSTEMI

Conservative treatment

invasive treatment

revascularization

unstable angina pectoris

PMID (1):

40135822

MeSH

acute coronary syndrome

conservative treatment

myocardial infarction

stroke

Revascularization may reduce subsequent MI and invasive procedures but not mortality compared to conservative care in older patients following non-ST elevation MI. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background
Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are a common cause of hospital admission in older patients. Our study aims to synthesize the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes with invasive versus conservative medical management in this population.

Methods
A literature search of online databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to September 1, 2024. The search aimed to identify RCTs that reported clinical outcomes with invasive versus conservative strategies in older patients (≥ 70 years) with NSTE-ACS. The risk ratios (RRs) were used as summary estimates.

Results
Seven RCTs with 2998 patients were included; 1490 patients in the invasive group and 1508 patients in the conservatively managed group. The pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two strategies for the risk of all-cause death (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92–1.15), cardiovascular death (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.82–1.33), stroke (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.53–1.15), and major bleeding (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.90–1.69). However, the invasive strategy was associated with a significantly reduced risk of myocardial infarction (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57–0.96) and unplanned revascularization (RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21–0.40) compared to the conservative strategy.

Conclusion
In older patients with NSTE-ACS, an invasive strategy reduces the risk of repeat myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization without a significant increase in stroke or major bleeding. There was no associated reduction in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality with the invasive strategy compared to conservative management.

Author/s:

Mushood Ahmed, Areeba Ahsan, Aimen Shafiq, Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi

Conservative versus surgical management for patients with rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and META-analysis

Devin Evans — Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

February 3, 2021

Journal/Publication:

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Publication Date:

January 8, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

URL:

Conservative versus surgical management for patients with rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and META-analysis

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12891-020-03872-4

Keywords

Conservative treatment

PMID (1):

33419401

MeSH

conservative treatment

Shoulder

MEDLINE

pain

This meta-analysis found very little benefit from rotator cuff surgery in patients with full thickness tears compared to conservative management. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: This study aims to compare conservative versus surgical management for patients with full-thickness RC tear in terms of clinical and structural outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up.

Methods: A comprehensive search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and reference lists of retrieved articles was performed since the inception of each database until August 2020. According to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, two independent authors screened all suitable studies for the inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Only randomised controlled trials comparing conservative and surgical management of full-thickness RC tear in adults were included. The primary outcome measure was the effectiveness of each treatment in terms of Constant-Murley score (CMS) and VAS pain score at different time points. The secondary outcome was the integrity of the repaired tendon evaluated on postoperative MRI at different time points. The GRADE guidelines were used to assess the critical appraisal status and quality of evidence.

Results: A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria. The average value of CMS score at 12 months of follow-up was 77.6 ± 14.4 in the surgery group and 72.8 ± 16.5 in the conservative group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. Similar results were demonstrated at 24 months of follow-up. The mean of VAS pain score at 12 months of follow-up was 1.4 ± 1.6 in the surgery group and 2.4 ± 1.9 in the conservative group. Quantitative synthesis showed better results in favour of the surgical group in terms of VAS pain score one year after surgery (- 1.08, 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.58; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: At a 2-year follow-up, shoulder function evaluated in terms of CMS was not significantly improved. Further high-quality level-I randomised controlled trials at longer term follow-up are needed to evaluate whether surgical and conservative treatment provide comparable long-term results.

Author/s:

Longo, Umile G., Ambrogioni, Laura R., Candela, Vincenzo, Berton, Alessandra, Carnevale, Arianna, Schena, Emiliano, Denaro, Vincenzo

5-year mental health and eating pattern outcomes following bariatric surgery in adolescents: a prospective cohort study

John Bayhi — Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:36:07 +0000

Date Added:

February 21, 2020

Journal/Publication:

The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health

Publisher:

Elsevier Ltd.

Publication Date:

January 21, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

P210-219

URL:

5-year mental health and eating pattern outcomes following bariatric surgery in adolescents: a prospective cohort study

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30024-9

Keywords

PMID (1):

31978372

Bariatric surgery in adolescents can improve BMI but not mental health, at least not in Sweden. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

BACKGROUND:

Mental health problems are prevalent among adolescents with severe obesity, but long-term mental health outcomes after adolescent bariatric surgery are not well known. We aimed to assess mental health outcomes over 5 years of follow-up after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in adolescents who participated in the Adolescent Morbid Obesity Surgery (AMOS) study.

METHODS:

This was a non-randomised matched-control study in adolescents aged 13-18 years who had a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or higher, or 35 kg/m2 or higher in addition to obesity-related comorbidity; who had previously undergone failed comprehensive conservative treatment; and were of pubertal Tanner stage III or higher, with height growth velocity beyond peak. A contemporary control group, matched for BMI, age, and sex, who underwent conventional obesity treatment, was obtained from the Swedish Childhood Obesity Treatment Register. Data on dispensed psychiatric drugs and specialist treatment for mental disorders were retrieved from national registers with complete coverage. In the surgical group only, questionnaires were used to assess self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem [RSE] score), mood (Mood Adjective Checklist [MACL]), and eating patterns (Binge Eating Scale [BES] and Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21 [TFEQ]). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00289705).

FINDINGS:

Between April 10, 2006, and May 20, 2009, 81 adolescents (53 [65%] female) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, and 80 control participants received conventional treatment. The proportion of participants prescribed psychiatric drugs did not differ between groups in the years before study inclusion (pre-baseline; absolute risk difference 5% [95% CI -7 to 16], p=0·4263) or after intervention (10% [-6 to 24], p=0·2175). Treatment for mental and behavioural disorders did not differ between groups before baseline (2% [-10 to 14], p=0·7135); however, adolescents in the surgical group had more specialised psychiatric treatment in the 5 years after obesity treatment than did the control group (15% [1 to 28], p=0·0410). There were few patients who discontinued psychiatric treatment post-surgery (three [4%] receiving psychiatric drug treatment and six [7%] receiving specialised care for a mental disorder before surgery). In the surgical group, self-esteem (RSE score) was improved after 5 years (mixed model mean 21·6 [95% CI 19·9 to 23·4]) relative to baseline (18·9 [17·4 to 20·4], p=0·0059), but overall mood (MACL score) was not (2·8 [2·7 to 2·9] at 5 years vs 2·7 [2·6 to 2·8] at baseline, p=0·0737). Binge eating was improved at 5 years (9·3 [7·4 to 11·2]) relative to baseline (15·0 [13·5 to 16·5], p<0·0001). Relative changes in BMI were not associated with the presence or absence of binge eating at baseline.

INTERPRETATION:

Mental health problems persist in adolescents 5 years after bariatric surgery despite substantial weight loss. Although bariatric surgery can improve many aspects of health, alleviation of mental health problems should not be expected, and a multidisciplinary bariatric team should offer long-term mental health support after surgery.

FUNDING:

Swedish Research Council, VINNOVA, Västra Götalandsregionen, ALF VG-region, Region Stockholm, Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation, Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, Tore Nilsson's Foundation, SUS Foundations and Donations, Capio Research Foundation, and Mary von Sydow's Foundation.

Author/s:

Järvholm, K, Bruze, G, Peltonen, M, Marcus, C, Flodmark, CE, Henfridsson, P, Beamish, AJ, Gronowitz, E, Dahlgren, J, Karlsson, J, Olbers, T