cannabinoids

Importance The wide use of unregulated cannabidiol (CBD) products among consumers raises safety concerns. Most research on CBD has studied the relatively high doses used by patients taking prescription CBD. However, limited safety data are available at lower doses.

Objective To study the effects of 4-weeks of twice-daily CBD use on the liver and endocrine hormones using a dose within the range consumers are taking with unregulated CBD products.

Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial from January to August 2024, using per protocol analysis, included healthy adults recruited from a clinical pharmacology unit (Spaulding Clinical Research in West Bend, Wisconsin).

Interventions Healthy participants were randomized to CBD, 5 mg/kg/d (2.5 mg/kg/d twice daily), or placebo for 28 days with weekly laboratory assessments.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the percentage of participants with an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level elevation greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal during the study.

Results In 201 healthy participants (median age, 36 years [IQR, 30-43 years]; 89 women [44%]), 8 participants (5.6%; 95% CI, 1.8%-9.3%) in the CBD group and 0 participants (0%; 95% CI, 0%-7.6%) in the placebo group had liver enzyme level elevation greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Seven participants met withdrawal criteria for potential drug-induced liver injury, detected at day 21 in 2 participants and day 28 in 5 participants. No differences in change from baseline were observed between the CBD and placebo groups for total testosterone and inhibin B in male participants or thyrotropin, total triiodothyronine, and free thyroxine in all participants.

Conclusions and Relevance In this study, the incidence of elevated alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase coupled with the finding of increased eosinophilia, underscores the need for further investigation on the long-term effects of CBD use, its impact on various populations, and the safety of lower doses commonly used by consumers.

Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06192589

Author/s:

Jeffry Florian, Pablo Salcedo, Keith Burkhart, Aanchal Shah, Lakshmi Manasa S Chekka, Dro Keshishi, Vikram Patel, ShanChao Yang, Melanie Fein, Ryan DePalma, Murali Matta, David G Strauss, Rodney Rouse

Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain : A Systematic Review

Saige Blanchard — Tue, 14 Jun 2022 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

June 14, 2022

Journal/Publication:

Annals of Internal Medicine

Publisher:

American College of Physicians

Publication Date:

June 7, 2022

URL:

Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain : A Systematic Review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.7326/M21-4520

Keywords

PMID (1):

35667066

MeSH

A systematic review of cannabis-related compounds for chronic pain. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Contemporary data are needed about the utility of cannabinoids in chronic pain.

Purpose: To evaluate the benefits and harms of cannabinoids for chronic pain.

Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to January 2022.

Study selection: English-language, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and cohort studies (≥1 month duration) of cannabinoids for chronic pain.

Data extraction: Data abstraction, risk of bias, and strength of evidence assessments were dually reviewed. Cannabinoids were categorized by THC-to-CBD ratio (high, comparable, or low) and source (synthetic, extract or purified, or whole plant).

Data synthesis: Eighteen randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 1740) and 7 cohort studies (n = 13 095) assessed cannabinoids. Studies were primarily short term (1 to 6 months); 56% enrolled patients with neuropathic pain, with 3% to 89% female patients. Synthetic products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (>98% THC) may be associated with moderate improvement in pain severity and response (≥30% improvement) and an increased risk for sedation and are probably associated with a large increased risk for dizziness. Extracted products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (range, 3:1 to 47:1) may be associated with large increased risk for study withdrawal due to adverse events and dizziness. Sublingual spray with comparable THC-to-CBD ratio (1.1:1) probably is associated with small improvement in pain severity and overall function and may be associated with large increased risk for dizziness and sedation and moderate increased risk for nausea. Evidence for other products and outcomes, including longer-term harms, were not reported or were insufficient.

Limitation: Variation in interventions; lack of study details, including unclear availability in the United States; and inadequate evidence for some products.

Conclusion: Oral, synthetic cannabis products with high THC-to-CBD ratios and sublingual, extracted cannabis products with comparable THC-to-CBD ratios may be associated with short-term improvements in chronic pain and increased risk for dizziness and sedation. Studies are needed on long-term outcomes and further evaluation of product formulation effects.

Author/s:

McDonah, M. S., Morasco, B. J., Wagner, J., Ahmed, A. Y., Fu, R., Kansagara, D., Chou, R.

Safety and tolerability of natural and synthetic cannabinoids in adults aged over 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Devin Evans — Wed, 07 Apr 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

April 7, 2021

Journal/Publication:

PLos Med

Publication Date:

March 29, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Safety and tolerability of natural and synthetic cannabinoids in adults aged over 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1371/journal.pmed.1003524

Keywords

PMID (1):

33780450

MeSH

cannabinoids

aged

insulin receptor-related receptor

Drug Combinations

cannabidiol

A systematic review of studies of the use of natural and synthetic cannabinoids in people over 50. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) are being used widely in the elderly. However, their safety and tolerability in older adults remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and tolerability of CBMs in adults of age ≥50 years.

Methods and findings: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (1 January 1990 to 3 October 2020). Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of CBMs in those with mean age of ≥50 years for all indications, evaluating the safety/tolerability of CBMs where adverse events have been quantified, were included. Study quality was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Two reviewers conducted all review stages independently. Where possible, data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Effect sizes were calculated as incident rate ratio (IRR) for outcome data such as adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and death and risk ratio (RR) for withdrawal from study and reported separately for studies using tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), THC:cannabidiol (CBD) combination, and CBD. A total of 46 RCTs were identified as suitable for inclusion of which 31 (67%) were conducted in the United Kingdom and Europe. There were 6,216 patients (mean age 58.6 ± 7.5 years; 51% male) included in the analysis, with 3,469 receiving CBMs. Compared with controls, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing CBMs significantly increased the incidence of all-cause and treatment-related AEs: THC alone (IRR: 1.42 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.78]) and (IRR: 1.60 [95% CI, 1.26 to 2.04]); THC:CBD combination (IRR: 1.58 [95% CI,1.26 to 1.98]) and (IRR: 1.70 [95% CI,1.24 to 2.33]), respectively. IRRs of SAEs and deaths were not significantly greater under CBMs containing THC with or without CBD. THC:CBD combination (RR: 1.40 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.80]) but not THC alone (RR: 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.57]) significantly increased risk of AE-related withdrawals. CBD alone did not increase the incidence of all-cause AEs (IRR: 1.02 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.16]) or other outcomes as per qualitative synthesis. AE-related withdrawals were significantly associated with THC dose in THC only [QM (df = 1) = 4.696, p = 0.03] and THC:CBD combination treatment ([QM (df = 1) = 4.554, p = 0.033]. THC-containing CBMs significantly increased incidence of dry mouth, dizziness/light-headedness, and somnolence/drowsiness. Study limitations include inability to fully exclude data from those <50 years of age in our primary analyses as well as limitations related to weaknesses in the included trials particularly incomplete reporting of outcomes and heterogeneity in included studies.

Conclusions: This pooled analysis, using data from RCTs with mean participant age ≥50 years, suggests that although THC-containing CBMs are associated with side effects, CBMs in general are safe and acceptable in older adults. However, THC:CBD combinations may be less acceptable in the dose ranges used and their tolerability may be different in adults over 65 or 75 years of age.

Author/s:

Velayudhan, Latha, McGoohan, Katie, Bhattacharyya, Sagnik

Drug interactions with cannabinoids

John Bayhi — Mon, 02 Mar 2020 18:41:14 +0000

Date Added:

March 2, 2020

Journal/Publication:

CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

Publisher:

Joule Inc.

Publication Date:

March 2, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

192

Pages:

E206

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

Keywords

MeSH

Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2

cannabinoids

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A

Tacrolimus

Trimethoprim

Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors

CYP2C19 protein

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19

Benzodiazepines

International Normalized Ratio

Marijuana Use

cholinergic antagonists

A nice one-page review of drug interactions with cannabinoids. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

No abstract available

Author/s:

Antoniou, T, Bodkin, J, Ho, JMW

Therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids: an evidence mapping and appraisal of systematic reviews

John Bayhi — Mon, 03 Feb 2020 19:39:52 +0000

Date Added:

February 3, 2020

Journal/Publication:

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

Publisher:

Springer Nature

Publication Date:

January 15, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12906-019-2803-2

Keywords

Another summary of what we know about the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids. The figures appear to be useful. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background

Although cannabis and cannabinoids are widely used with therapeutic purposes, their claimed efficacy is highly controversial. For this reason, medical cannabis use is a broad field of research that is rapidly expanding. Our objectives are to identify, characterize, appraise, and organize the current available evidence surrounding therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids, using evidence maps.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, to identify systematic reviews (SRs) published from their inception up to December 2017. Two authors assessed eligibility and extracted data independently. We assessed methodological quality of the included SRs using the AMSTAR tool. To illustrate the extent of use of medical cannabis, we organized the results according to identified PICO questions using bubble plots corresponding to different clinical scenarios.

Results

A total of 44 SRs published between 2001 and 2017 were included in this evidence mapping with data from 158 individual studies. We extracted 96 PICO questions in the following medical conditions: multiple sclerosis, movement disorders (e.g. Tourette Syndrome, Parkinson Disease), psychiatry conditions, Alzheimer disease, epilepsy, acute and chronic pain, cancer, neuropathic pain, symptoms related to cancer (e.g. emesis and anorexia related with chemotherapy), rheumatic disorders, HIV-related symptoms, glaucoma, and COPD. The evidence about these conditions is heterogeneous regarding the conclusions and the quality of the individual primary studies. The quality of the SRs was moderate to high according to AMSTAR scores.

Conclusions

Evidence on medical uses of cannabis is broad. However, due to methodological limitations, conclusions were weak in most of the assessed comparisons. Evidence mapping methodology is useful to perform an overview of available research, since it is possible to systematically describe the extent and distribution of evidence, and to organize scattered data.

Author/s:

Montero-Oleas, N, Arevalo-Rodriguez, I, Nunez-Gonzalez, S, Viteri-Garcia, A, Simancas-Racines, D