Health Services

Patients referred for colonoscopy have lots of questions that are not always being answered by primary care clinicians. Many would appreciate being able to access additional information through the the practice’s portal. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support.

Methods: Primary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016.

Results: Findings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician.

Conclusions: Patient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02798224.

Author/s:

Dyer, Karen E., Shires, Deirdre A.

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Wounds in Older Adults

Brian Desmarais — Thu, 09 Apr 2020 00:38:07 +0000

Date Added:

April 8, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publication Date:

October 1, 2020

URL:

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Wounds in Older Adults

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.10.014

Keywords

MeSH

A nice review of chronic wound prevention and care principles from Mayo. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Chronic wounds are common, disproportionately affect older adults, and are likely to be encountered by providers across all specialties and care settings. All providers should be familiar with basic wound prevention, identification, classification, and treatment approach, all of which are outlined in this article.

Author/s:

Hoversten, K.P., Kiemele, L.J., Stolp, A.M., Verdoorn, B.

Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review

John Bayhi — Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:56:05 +0000

Date Added:

September 27, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Annals of Family Medicine

Publisher:

Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Publication Date:

September 17, 2019

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

448-458

URL:

Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review

Type:

Practice Management Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1370/afm.2419

Keywords

PMID (1):

31501208

MeSH

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

The results of this study should be of interest and helpful to practices that provide care management services. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

PURPOSE:

Case management (CM) interventions are effective for frequent users of health care services, but little is known about which intervention characteristics lead to positive outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics of CM that yield positive outcomes among frequent users with chronic disease in primary care.

METHODS:

For this systematic review of both quantitative and qualitative studies, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO (1996 to September 2017) and included articles meeting the following criteria: (1)population: adult frequent users with chronic disease, (2)intervention: CM in a primary care setting with a postintervention evaluation, and (3)primary outcomes: integration of services, health care system use, cost, and patient outcome measures. Independent reviewers screened abstracts, read full texts, appraised methodologic quality (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool), and extracted data from the included studies. Sufficient and necessary CM intervention characteristics were identified using configurational comparative methods.

RESULTS:

Of the 10,687 records retrieved, 20 studies were included; 17 quantitative, 2 qualitative, and 1 mixed methods study. Analyses revealed that it is necessary to identify patients most likely to benefit from a CM intervention for CM to produce positive outcomes. High-intensity intervention or the presence of a multidisciplinary/interorganizational care plan was also associated with positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Policy makers and clinicians should focus on their case-finding processes because this is the essential characteristic of CM effectiveness. In addition, value should be placed on high-intensity CM interventions and developing care plans with multiple types of care providers to help improve patient outcomes.

Author/s:

Hudon, C, Chouinard, MC, Pluye, P, El Sherif, R, Bush, PL, Rihoux, B, Poitras, ME, Lambert, M, Zomahoun, HTV, Legare, F