Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience

Clinical assessment and care of homeless and vulnerably housed populations should include tailoring approaches to a person’s gender, age, Indigenous heritage, ethnicity and history of trauma; and advocacy for comprehensive primary health care.
As initial steps in the care of homeless and vulnerably housed populations, permanent supportive housing is strongly recommended, and income assistance is also recommended.
Case-management interventions, with access to psychiatric support, are recommended as an initial step to support primary care and to address existing mental health, substance use and other morbidities.
Harm-reduction interventions, such as supervised consumption facilities, and access to pharmacologic agents for opioid use disorder, such as opioid agonist treatment, are recommended for people who use substances.

Author/s:

Pottie, K."

Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review

John Bayhi — Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:56:05 +0000

Date Added:

September 27, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Annals of Family Medicine

Publisher:

Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Publication Date:

September 17, 2019

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

448-458

URL:

Characteristics of Case Management in Primary Care Associated With Positive Outcomes for Frequent Users of Health Care: A Systematic Review

Type:

Practice Management Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1370/afm.2419

Keywords

PMID (1):

31501208

MeSH

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

The results of this study should be of interest and helpful to practices that provide care management services. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

PURPOSE:

Case management (CM) interventions are effective for frequent users of health care services, but little is known about which intervention characteristics lead to positive outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics of CM that yield positive outcomes among frequent users with chronic disease in primary care.

METHODS:

For this systematic review of both quantitative and qualitative studies, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO (1996 to September 2017) and included articles meeting the following criteria: (1)population: adult frequent users with chronic disease, (2)intervention: CM in a primary care setting with a postintervention evaluation, and (3)primary outcomes: integration of services, health care system use, cost, and patient outcome measures. Independent reviewers screened abstracts, read full texts, appraised methodologic quality (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool), and extracted data from the included studies. Sufficient and necessary CM intervention characteristics were identified using configurational comparative methods.

RESULTS:

Of the 10,687 records retrieved, 20 studies were included; 17 quantitative, 2 qualitative, and 1 mixed methods study. Analyses revealed that it is necessary to identify patients most likely to benefit from a CM intervention for CM to produce positive outcomes. High-intensity intervention or the presence of a multidisciplinary/interorganizational care plan was also associated with positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Policy makers and clinicians should focus on their case-finding processes because this is the essential characteristic of CM effectiveness. In addition, value should be placed on high-intensity CM interventions and developing care plans with multiple types of care providers to help improve patient outcomes.

Author/s:

Hudon, C, Chouinard, MC, Pluye, P, El Sherif, R, Bush, PL, Rihoux, B, Poitras, ME, Lambert, M, Zomahoun, HTV, Legare, F