Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is common among patients with hypokalemia and hypertension. Patients with PA are at an increased risk of chronic disease if undiagnosed or untreated. Expert consensus recommends screening for PA in high-risk populations. Most antihypertensive medications can be continued during the work-up for PA. An elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio is suggestive of PA.

Author/s:

Dubrofsky, L., Hundemer, G. L.

Management of Heart Failure

Aubrey Delammermore — Sat, 24 Sep 2022 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

September 24, 2022

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

September 15, 2022

Pages:

E1-E2

URL:

Management of Heart Failure

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2022.16667

Keywords

Stroke Volume

American Heart Association

Cardiology

heart failure

Sodium

PMID (1):

36107415

MeSH

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Angioedema

Updated guidelines for management of congestive heart failure rom the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

GUIDELINE TITLE 2022 American College of Cardiology
(ACC)/American Heart Association AHA)/Heart Failure
Society of America (HFSA) Guidelines for the Management
of Heart Failure
RELEASE DATE April 1, 2022
PRIOR VERSIONS 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update
of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of
Heart Failure and 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the
Management of Heart Failure
DEVELOPER AND FUNDING SOURCE ACC/AHA Joint
Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
TARGET POPULATION Adult patients with a diagnosis of
or at risk for heart failure (HF)
MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS
• Classifications for HF are separated into 4 categories based
on ejection fraction (EF) and disease history: HF with
reduced EF (EF 40%), HF with mildly reduced EF
(EF 41%-49%), HF with preserved EF (EF 50%), and HF
with improved EF (EF previously 40% with improvement
to >40%).
• In patients with chronic HF with reduced EF, angiotensin
receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) are preferred over
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and
angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). If ARNI use is not
feasible, ACEIs are preferred over ARBs, unless there is
significant cough or angioedema (class 1, level of
evidence [LOE] A).
• Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors should
be included across all HF categories (symptomatic HF with
reduced EF [class 1, LOE A]; HF with mildly reduced EF and
HF with preserved EF [class 2a, LOE B-R]).
• Patients with HF with improved EF should continue to
receive medical therapy originally indicated for HF with
reduced EF (class 1, LOE B-R).
• Evidence-based treatment of HF with preserved EF
includes blood pressure control (class 1, LOE C-LD),
SGLT2 inhibitors (class 2a, LOE B-R), mineralocorticoid
antagonists, ARBs, and ARNIs (class 2b, LOE B-R).

Author/s:

Belkin, M. N., Cifu, A. S., Pinney, S.

Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Brian Desmarais — Tue, 03 Nov 2020 17:27:27 +0000

Date Added:

November 3, 2020

Journal/Publication:

New England Journal of Medicine

Publication Date:

October 8, 2020

URL:

Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1056/NEJMoa2024816

MeSH

Albuminuria

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Diuretics, Osmotic

blood glucose

renal insufficiency, chronic

diabetes mellitus

RPR Commentary: In patients with chronic kidney disease and albuminuria, dapaglaflozin reduced the rate of progression by 40% (about the same amount as previously found for ACE inhibitors). The mechanism or mechanisms is/are still speculative. In patients with elevated blood glucose levels, dapaglaflozin is an osmotic diuretic. However, it seems to be reno-protective even in people without diabetes (as are ACE inhibitors). James Mold, MD, MPH

View

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease have a high risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. The effect of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease, with or without type 2 diabetes, is not known.

Methods: We randomly assigned 4304 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 25 to 75 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of 200 to 5000 to receive dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of a sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes.

Results: The independent data monitoring committee recommended stopping the trial because of efficacy. Over a median of 2.4 years, a primary outcome event occurred in 197 of 2152 participants (9.2%) in the dapagliflozin group and 312 of 2152 participants (14.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.72; P<0.001; number needed to treat to prevent one primary outcome event, 19 [95% CI, 15 to 27]). The hazard ratio for the composite of a sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal causes was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; P<0.001), and the hazard ratio for the composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92; P = 0.009). Death occurred in 101 participants (4.7%) in the dapagliflozin group and 146 participants (6.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.88; P = 0.004). The effects of dapagliflozin were similar in participants with type 2 diabetes and in those without type 2 diabetes. The known safety profile of dapagliflozin was confirmed.

Conclusions: Among patients with chronic kidney disease, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes, the risk of a composite of a sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes was significantly lower with dapagliflozin than with placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; DAPA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036150.).

Author/s:

DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators

Estimating Lifetime Benefits of Comprehensive Disease-Modifying Pharmacological Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Comparative Analysis of Three Randomised Controlled Trials

John Bayhi — Tue, 26 May 2020 20:29:33 +0000

Date Added:

May 26, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Lancet

Publisher:

Elsevier Ltd

Publication Date:

May 21, 2020

Volume:

Online ahead of print

URL:

Estimating Lifetime Benefits of Comprehensive Disease-Modifying Pharmacological Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Comparative Analysis of Three Randomised Controlled Trials

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30748-0

Keywords

CHF patients

heart failure

pharmacologic management

PMID (1):

32446323

MeSH

Humans

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Neprilysin

heart failure

SLC5A2 protein, human

sodium-glucose transporter 2

Stroke Volume

Control Groups

Receptors, Drug

Progression-Free Survival

Receptors, Angiotensin

NR3C2 protein, human

For those of you who still initiate and manage CHF with reduced LV ejection fraction, this meta-analysis appears to support using combinations of the following five agents: 1) an ACEI or ARB, 2) a beta-blocker, 3) a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], 4) an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI], and 5) a sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitor. They estimate that combined therapy could increase life expectancy for an 80-year-old 1.4 years and for a 55-year-old 6.3 years. If we are going to continue to manage these patients, it looks like we are going to have to develop specific CHF visits and protocols like those used in CHF clinics run by cardiology teams. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Background: Three drug classes (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs], angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors [ARNIs], and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitors) reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) beyond conventional therapy consisting of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and β blockers. Each class was previously studied with different background therapies and the expected treatment benefits with their combined use are not known. Here, we used data from three previously reported randomised controlled trials to estimate lifetime gains in event-free survival and overall survival with comprehensive therapy versus conventional therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF.

Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated treatment effects of comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy (ARNI, β blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor) versus conventional therapy (ACE inhibitor or ARB and β blocker) in patients with chronic HFrEF by making indirect comparisons of three pivotal trials, EMPHASIS-HF (n=2737), PARADIGM-HF (n=8399), and DAPA-HF (n=4744). Our primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or first hospital admission for heart failure; we also assessed these endpoints individually and assessed all-cause mortality. Assuming these relative treatment effects are consistent over time, we then projected incremental long-term gains in event-free survival and overall survival with comprehensive disease-modifying therapy in the control group of the EMPHASIS-HF trial (ACE inhibitor or ARB and β blocker).

Findings: The hazard ratio (HR) for the imputed aggregate treatment effects of comprehensive disease-modifying therapy versus conventional therapy on the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for heart failure was 0·38 (95% CI 0·30-0·47). HRs were also favourable for cardiovascular death alone (HR 0·50 [95% CI 0·37-0·67]), hospital admission for heart failure alone (0·32 [0·24-0·43]), and all-cause mortality (0·53 [0·40-0·70]). Treatment with comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy was estimated to afford 2·7 additional years (for an 80-year-old) to 8·3 additional years (for a 55-year-old) free from cardiovascular death or first hospital admission for heart failure and 1·4 additional years (for an 80-year-old) to 6·3 additional years (for a 55-year-old) of survival compared with conventional therapy.

Interpretation: Among patients with HFrEF, the anticipated aggregate treatment effects of early comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy are substantial and support the combination use of an ARNI, β blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor as a new therapeutic standard.

Funding: None.

Author/s:

Vaduganathan, M., Claggett, BL, Jhund, PS, Cunningham, JW, Ferreira, JP, Zannad, F, Packer, M, Fonarow, GC, McMurray, JJV, Solomon, S.D.

Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study

Brian Desmarais — Sat, 24 Aug 2019 19:20:10 +0000

Date Added:

August 24, 2019

Journal/Publication:

The Lancet

Publication Date:

August 22, 2019

URL:

Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1

Keywords

Cardiology

Vascular medicine

MeSH

ventricular dysfunction, left

Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

It appears, from this analysis of a large clinical trial, that women with CHF need only half the doses of ACEs, ARBs, and beta blockers that men do to achieve the same benefits. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Summary

Background

Guideline-recommended doses of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), and β blockers are similar for men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), even though there are known sex differences in pharmacokinetics of these drugs. We hypothesised that there might be sex differences in the optimal dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers in patients with HFrEF.

Methods

We did a post-hoc analysis of BIOSTAT-CHF, a prospective study in 11 European countries of patients with heart failure in whom initiation and up-titration of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers was encouraged by protocol. We included only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and excluded those who died within the first 3 months. Primary outcome was a composite of time to all-cause mortality or hospitalisation for heart failure. Findings were validated in ASIAN-HF, an independent cohort of 3539 men and 961 women with HFrEF.

Findings

Among 1308 men and 402 women with HFrEF from BIOSTAT-CHF, women were older (74 [12] years vs 70 [12] years, p<0·0001) and had lower bodyweights (72 [16] kg vs 85 [18] kg, p<0·0001) and heights (162 [7] cm vs 174 [8] cm, p<0·0001) than did men, although body-mass index did not differ significantly. A similar number of men and women reached guideline-recommended target doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs (99 [25%] vs 304 [23%], p=0·61) and β blockers (57 [14%] vs 168 [13%], p=0·54). In men, the lowest hazards of death or hospitalisation for heart failure occurred at 100% of the recommended dose of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, but women showed approximately 30% lower risk at only 50% of the recommended doses, with no further decrease in risk at higher dose levels. These sex differences were still present after adjusting for clinical covariates, including age and body surface area. In the ASIAN-HF registry, similar patterns were observed for both ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers, with women having approximately 30% lower risk at 50% of the recommended doses, with no further benefit at higher dose levels.

Interpretation

This study suggests that women with HFrEF might need lower doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers than men, and brings into question what the true optimal medical therapy is for women versus men.

Funding

European Commission.

Author/s:

Santema, B.T., Ouwerkerk, W., Tromp, J., Sama, I.E., Ravera, A., Regitz-Zagrosek, V.

Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Brian Desmarais — Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:11:44 +0000

Date Added:

June 18, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publisher:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publication Date:

June 13, 2019

URL:

Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2019.7662

Keywords

MeSH

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

myocardial infarction

Receptors, Angiotensin

Death, Sudden, Cardiac

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

This is the most recent AHA/ACC guideline regarding how to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in those at risk.

Free full text

View

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%), guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is recommended to reduce sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality; GDMT includes β-blockers; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (class I, level A recommendation).
In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or less due to ischemic heart disease at least 40 days after myocardial infarction, at least 90 days after revascularization, and with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure despite GDMT, an ICD is recommended if expected survival is greater than 1 year (class I, level A recommendation).
In patients with LVEF of 30% or less due to ischemic heart disease at least 40 days after myocardial infarction, at least 90 days after revascularization, and with NYHA class I heart failure symptoms despite GDMT, an ICD is recommended if expected survival is greater than 1 year (class I, level A recommendation).
In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, NYHA class II to III symptoms, and LVEF of 35% or less despite GDMT, an ICD is recommended if expected survival is greater than 1 year (class I, level A recommendation).

Author/s:

Beaser, A.D., Cifu, A.S.