Mass Screening

Sleep as a vital sign

Rowan Hutchins — Sat, 06 May 2023 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 6, 2023

Journal/Publication:

Sleep Science & Practice

Publisher:

Biomed Central

Publication Date:

April 24, 2023

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Sleep as a vital sign

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41606-023-00085-1

Keywords

MeSH

A well-reasoned argument in favor of routine screening of adults for sleep problems and suggestions regarding how to do it. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Sleep is causally linked to the maintenance of every major physiological body system and disturbed sleep contributes to myriad diseases. The problem is, however, is that patients do not consistently, nor spontaneously, report sleep problems to their clinicians. Compounding the problem, there is no standard-of-care approach to even the most rudimentary of sleep queries. As a result, sleep disturbances remain largely invisible to most clinicians, and consequentially, unaddressed for the patient themselves – thereby exacerbating physical and mental health challenges due to unaddressed sleep problems. In this review, we argue that all patients should be routinely screened with a short, readily available, and validated assessment for sleep disturbances in clinical encounters. If the initial assessment is positive for any subjective sleep-related problems, it should prompt a more thorough investigation for specific sleep disorders. We further describe how a program of short and simple sleep health screening is a viable, efficacious yet currently missing pathway through which clinicians can 1) screen for sleep-related problems, 2) identify patients with sleep disorders, 3) rapidly offer evidence-based treatment, and (if indicated) 4) refer patients with complex presentations to sleep medicine specialists.

Author/s:

Hirschtritt, M.E., Walker, M. P., Krystal, A.D.

Cervical cancer screening guideline for individuals at average risk

Bethie Seay — Sun, 14 Nov 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

November 14, 2021

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

November 12, 2021

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.13448

MeSH

female

Adult

aged

uterine cervical neoplasms

early detection of cancer

Papillomavirus Infections

American Cancer Society

The American Cancer Society’s most recent recommendations regarding cervical cancer screening.

View

Major recommendations

Begin screening at age 25 years regardless of sexual history or HPV vaccination status (strong recommendation)

Primary HPV testing every 5 years through age 65 years (strong recommendation)

If primary HPV testing is not available use cotesting (HPV+ cytology) every 5 years or every 3 years if cytology only (strong recommendation)

Discontinue screening at age 65 years if no history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnosis in last 25 years and adequate negative prior screening in last 10 years (qualified recommendation)

Author/s:

Chor, J., Davis, A. M., Rusiecki, J. M.

Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes

Bethie Seay — Thu, 26 Aug 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

August 26, 2021

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.12531

The U.S. Preventive Services Advisory Committee recommends screening nonpregnant adults aged 35 – 70 with BMI >25 for prediabetes and diabetes. While there is no recommendation regarding how often to screen, they mention that every 3 years seems reasonable based upon the evidence they reviewed.

View

IMPORTANCE An estimated 13% of all US adults (18 years or older) have diabetes, and 34.5%
meet criteria for prediabetes. The prevalences of prediabetes and diabetes are higher in older
adults. Estimates of the risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes vary widely, perhaps
because of differences in the definition of prediabetes or the heterogeneity of prediabetes.
Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure and new cases of blindness among adults in the
US. It is also associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and was estimated to be the seventh leading cause
of death in the US in 2017. Screening asymptomatic adults for prediabetes and type 2
diabetes may allow earlier detection, diagnosis, and treatment, with the ultimate goal of
improving health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE To update its 2015 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a systematic
review to evaluate screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in asymptomatic,
nonpregnant adults and preventive interventions for those with prediabetes.
POPULATION Nonpregnant adults aged 35 to 70 years seen in primary care settings who have
overweight or obesity (defined as a body mass index 25 and 30, respectively) and no
symptoms of diabetes.
EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for
prediabetes and type 2 diabetes and offering or referring patients with prediabetes to
effective preventive interventions has a moderate net benefit.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends screening for prediabetes
and type 2 diabetes in adults aged 35 to 70 years who have overweight or obesity. Clinicians
should offer or refer patients with prediabetes to effective preventive interventions.
(B recommendation)

Author/s:

US Preventative Services task Force

Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Saige Blanchard — Fri, 21 May 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

May 18, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

325

Pages:

1965-1977

URL:

Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.6238

Keywords

PMID (1):

34003218

MeSH

Colorectal Neoplasms

hereditary nonpolyposis

incidence

Mass Screening

intestinal polyposis

Updated USPSTF recommendations regarding CRC screening. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death for both men and women, with an estimated 52 980 persons in the US projected to die of colorectal cancer in 2021. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among persons aged 65 to 74 years. It is estimated that 10.5% of new colorectal cancer cases occur in persons younger than 50 years. Incidence of colorectal cancer (specifically adenocarcinoma) in adults aged 40 to 49 years has increased by almost 15% from 2000-2002 to 2014-2016. In 2016, 26% of eligible adults in the US had never been screened for colorectal cancer and in 2018, 31% were not up to date with screening.

Objective: To update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for colorectal cancer in adults 40 years or older. The review also examined whether these findings varied by age, sex, or race/ethnicity. In addition, as in 2016, the USPSTF commissioned a report from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Colorectal Cancer Working Group to provide information from comparative modeling on how estimated life-years gained, colorectal cancer cases averted, and colorectal cancer deaths averted vary by different starting and stopping ages for various screening strategies.

Population: Asymptomatic adults 45 years or older at average risk of colorectal cancer (ie, no prior diagnosis of colorectal cancer, adenomatous polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease; no personal diagnosis or family history of known genetic disorders that predispose them to a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer [such as Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis]).

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that screening for colorectal cancer in adults aged 50 to 75 years has substantial net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for colorectal cancer in adults aged 45 to 49 years has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85 years who have been previously screened has small net benefit. Adults who have never been screened for colorectal cancer are more likely to benefit.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer in all adults aged 50 to 75 years. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer in adults aged 45 to 49 years. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer screening for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85 years. Evidence indicates that the net benefit of screening all persons in this age group is small. In determining whether this service is appropriate in individual cases, patients and clinicians should consider the patient's overall health, prior screening history, and preferences. (C recommendation).

Author/s:

Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., Krist, A. H., Kubik, M., Li, L., Ogedegbe, G., Owens, D. K., Pbert, L., Silverstein, M., Stevermer, J., Tseng, C., Wong, J. B.

Screening for Hypertension in Adults

Saige Blanchard — Wed, 05 May 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 5, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publisher:

U.S. Preventative Services Task Force

Publication Date:

April 27, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

325

Pages:

1650-1656

URL:

Screening for Hypertension in Adults

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Web Page

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.4987

Keywords

hypertension

heart failure

myocardial infarction

chronic kidney disease

MeSH

blood pressure

Mass Screening

hypertension

myocardial infarction

No surprise that the USPSTF recommends in-office screening for hypertension. What seems interesting is that they suggest getting confirmatory readings from outside the office before making the diagnosis. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

IMPORTANCE Hypertension is a prevalent condition that affects approximately 45% of the adult US population and is the most commonly diagnosed condition at outpatient office visits. Hypertension is a major contributing risk factor for heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. OBJECTIVE To reaffirm its 2015 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for hypertension in adults, the accuracy of office blood pressure measurement for initial screening, and the accuracy of various confirmatory blood pressure measurement methods. POPULATION Adults 18 years or older without known hypertension. EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT Using a reaffirmation deliberation process, the USPSTF concludes with high certainty that screening for hypertension in adults has substantial net benefit. RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends screening for hypertension in adults 18 years or older with office blood pressure measurement. The USPSTF recommends obtaining blood pressure measurements outside of the clinical setting for diagnostic confirmation before starting treatment. (A recommendation)

Author/s:

U.S. Preventative Services Task Force

Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Brian Desmarais — Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:30:42 +0000

Date Added:

September 29, 2020

Journal/Publication:

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Publication Date:

February 1, 2019

URL:

Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

MeSH

decision support techniques

early detection of cancer

Physician-Patient Relations

patient acceptance of healthcare

Patients referred for colonoscopy have lots of questions that are not always being answered by primary care clinicians. Many would appreciate being able to access additional information through the the practice’s portal. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-physician communication about colorectal cancer screening can affect screening use, but discussions often lack information that patients need for informed decision making and seldom address personal preferences or barriers. To address this gap, a series of patient focus groups was conducted to guide the development of an online, interactive decision support program. This article presents findings on patient information needs and barriers to colorectal cancer screening after receiving a screening recommendation from a physician, and their perspectives on using electronic patient portals as platforms for health-related decision support.

Methods: Primary care patients with recent colonoscopy or stool testing orders were identified via the centralized data repository of a large Midwestern health system. Seven gender-stratified focus groups (N=45 participants) were convened between April and July 2016. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for commonly expressed themes beginning in August 2016.

Results: Findings reveal a consistent need for simple and clear information on colorectal cancer screening. Participants desired step-by-step explanations of the colonoscopy procedure and information about bowel preparation options/alternatives. The desired level of additional information varied: some patients wanted to know about and act on test options, whereas others preferred following their physician-recommended testing path. Fears and concerns were prevalent, particularly about colonoscopy, and patients reported challenges getting these concerns and their informational needs addressed. Finally, they expressed consistent support for using the patient portal to gather additional information from their physician.

Conclusions: Patient portals may offer an opportunity to build sustainable programs for decision support and assistance that are integrated with clinic workflows and processes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02798224.

Author/s:

Dyer, Karen E., Shires, Deirdre A.

Unhealthy Drug Use: Screening

Brian Desmarais — Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:22:42 +0000

Date Added:

June 10, 2020

Publisher:

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Publication Date:

June 9, 2020

URL:

Unhealthy Drug Use: Screening

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Web Page

Keywords

recommendations

United States

MeSH

Mass Screening

substance-related disorders

research

We now have an official recommendation from USPSTF on screening for unhealthy drug use (do it). James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Not available.

Author/s:

U. S. Preventive Services Task Force

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: Screening

Brian Desmarais — Tue, 03 Mar 2020 14:44:41 +0000

Date Added:

March 3, 2020

Publisher:

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Publication Date:

March 1, 2020

URL:

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: Screening

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Web Page

MeSH

The USPSTF is now recommending that you screen all adults between age 18 and 79 for hepatitis C. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Not available

Screening for Colon Cancer in Older Adults: Risks, Benefits, and When to Stop

Brian Desmarais — Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:11:46 +0000

Date Added:

January 3, 2020

Journal/Publication:

The Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publication Date:

January 1, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

184–196

URL:

Screening for Colon Cancer in Older Adults: Risks, Benefits, and When to Stop

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.021

Keywords

MeSH

A fair and balanced review of CRC screening in older people from Mayo. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer and second leading cause of mortality from cancer in the United States. As the population ages, decisions regarding the initiation and cessation of screening and surveillance for CRC are of increasing importance. In elderly patients, the risks of CRC and the presenting signs and symptoms are similar to those in younger patients. Screening and ongoing surveillance should be considered in patients who have a life expectancy of 10 years or more. Life expectancy estimates can be calculated using online calculators. If screening is deemed appropriate, the choice of which test to use first is unclear. Currently, there are a number of modalities available to screen for CRC, including both invasive modalities (eg, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, capsule colonoscopy, and computed tomographic colonography) and noninvasive modalities (fecal immunochemical test, stool DNA testing, and blood testing). Colonoscopy and other invasive testing options are considered safe, but the risks of complications of the bowel preparation, the procedure, and sedation medications are all increased in older patients. In contrast, noninvasive testing provides a safe initial test; however, it is important to consider the increased false-positive rates in the elderly, and a positive test result will usually necessitate colonoscopy to establish the diagnosis. Ongoing screening and surveillance should be a shared decision-making process with the patient based on multiple factors including the patient’s morbidity and mortality risk from CRC and his or her underlying comorbidities, the patient’s functional status, and the patient’s preferences for screening. Ultimately, the decision to initiate or discontinue screening for CRC in older patients should be done based on a case-by-case individualized discussion.

Author/s:

Nee, J., Chippendale, R. Z., Feuerstein, J.D.

Screening for HIV Infection: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Brian Desmarais — Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:06:05 +0000

Date Added:

June 12, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publication Date:

June 11, 2019

URL:

Screening for HIV Infection: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2019.6587

Keywords

HIV

HIV prevention

HIV screening

MeSH

Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical

acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Premature Birth

Breast Feeding

The USPSTF recommends screening all adolescents and adults <65 years of age, all pregnant women, younger and all children and adults at risk for HIV infection at least once and then as clinically indicated. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

IMPORTANCE:

Approximately 1.1 million persons in the United States are currently living with HIV, and more than 700 000 persons have died of AIDS since the first cases were reported in 1981. There were approximately 38 300 new diagnoses of HIV infection in 2017. The estimated prevalence of HIV infection among persons 13 years and older in the United States is 0.4%, and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show a significant increase in HIV diagnoses starting at age 15 years. An estimated 8700 women living with HIV give birth each year in the United States. HIV can be transmitted from mother to child during pregnancy, labor, delivery, and breastfeeding. The incidence of perinatal HIV infection in the United States peaked in 1992 and has declined significantly following the implementation of routine prenatal HIV screening and the use of effective therapies and precautions to prevent mother-to-child transmission.

OBJECTIVE:

To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for HIV infection in adolescents, adults, and pregnant women.

EVIDENCE REVIEW:

The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for HIV infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults, the yield of screening for HIV infection at different intervals, the effects of initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) at a higher vs lower CD4 cell count, and the longer-term harms associated with currently recommended ART regimens. The USPSTF also reviewed the evidence on the benefits (specifically, reduced risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection) and harms of screening for HIV infection in pregnant persons, the yield of repeat screening for HIV at different intervals during pregnancy, the effectiveness of currently recommended ART regimens for reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection, and the harms of ART during pregnancy to the mother and infant.

FINDINGS:

The USPSTF found convincing evidence that currently recommended HIV tests are highly accurate in diagnosing HIV infection. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that identification and early treatment of HIV infection is of substantial benefit in reducing the risk of AIDS-related events or death. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that the use of ART is of substantial benefit in decreasing the risk of HIV transmission to uninfected sex partners. The USPSTF also found convincing evidence that identification and treatment of pregnant women living with HIV infection is of substantial benefit in reducing the rate of mother-to-child transmission. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that ART is associated with some harms, including neuropsychiatric, renal, and hepatic harms, and an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of screening for HIV infection in adolescents, adults, and pregnant women is substantial.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:

The USPSTF recommends screening for HIV infection in adolescents and adults aged 15 to 65 years. Younger adolescents and older adults who are at increased risk of infection should also be screened. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for HIV infection in all pregnant persons, including those who present in labor or at delivery whose HIVstatus is unknown. (A recommendation).

Author/s:

U. S. Preventive Services Task Force