Elderly care

Importance: Scalable delivery models of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), an effective treatment, are needed for widespread implementation, particularly in rural and underserved populations lacking ready access to insomnia treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone CBT-I vs education-only control (EOC) in older adults with moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain.

Design, setting, and participants: This is a randomized clinical trial of 327 participants 60 years and older who were recruited statewide through Kaiser Permanente Washington from September 2016 to December 2018. Participants were double screened 3 weeks apart for moderate to severe insomnia and osteoarthritis (OA) pain symptoms. Blinded assessments were conducted at baseline, after 2 months posttreatment, and at 12-month follow-up.

Interventions: Six 20- to 30-minute telephone sessions provided over 8 weeks. Participants submitted daily diaries and received group-specific educational materials. The CBT-I instruction included sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, cognitive restructuring, and homework. The EOC group received information about sleep and OA.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was score on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at 2 months posttreatment and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included pain (score on the Brief Pain Inventory-short form), depression (score on the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire), and fatigue (score on the Flinders Fatigue Scale).

Results: Of the 327 participants, the mean (SD) age was 70.2 (6.8) years, and 244 (74.6%) were women. In the 282 participants with follow-up ISI data, the total 2-month posttreatment ISI scores decreased 8.1 points in the CBT-I group and 4.8 points in the EOC group, an adjusted mean between-group difference of -3.5 points (95% CI, -4.4 to -2.6 points; P < .001). Results were sustained at 12-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference, -3.0 points; 95% CI, -4.1 to -2.0 points; P < .001). At 12-month follow-up, 67 of 119 (56.3%) participants receiving CBT-I remained in remission (ISI score, ≤7) compared with 33 of 128 (25.8%) participants receiving EOC. Fatigue was also significantly reduced in the CBT-I group compared with the EOC group at 2 months posttreatment (mean between-group difference, -2.0 points; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.9 points; P = <.001) and 12-month follow-up (mean between-group difference, -1.8 points; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.6 points; P = .003). Posttreatment significant differences were observed for pain, but these differences were not sustained at 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, telephone CBT-I was effective in improving sleep, fatigue, and, to a lesser degree, pain among older adults with comorbid insomnia and OA pain in a large statewide health plan. Results support provision of telephone CBT-I as an accessible, individualized, effective, and scalable insomnia treatment.

Author/s:

McCurry, Susan M., Zhu, Weiwei, Von Korff, Michael, Wellman, Robert, Morin, Charles M., Thakral, Manu, Yeung, Kai, Vitiello, Michael V.

APOE ɛ4 Allele Testing and Risk of Alzheimer Disease

Devin Evans — Thu, 21 Jan 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

The Journal of the American Medical Association

Publication Date:

January 14, 2021

URL:

APOE ɛ4 Allele Testing and Risk of Alzheimer Disease

Type:

Clinical Decision Aids

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2020.15085

Keywords

PMID (1):

33443531

MeSH

A brief review of the interpretation of APOE tests for diagnosing and predicting dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

A 64-year-old man presented with concern about an abnormal genetic test result for apolipoprotein E (APOE) obtained through his primary care physician. He reported forgetfulness and word-finding difficulties for 3 years but performed all activities of daily living independently and was generally healthy. His father and maternal great aunt developed dementia in their 70s. Physical (including neurologic) examination, basic laboratory studies, and brain magnetic resonance imaging results were normal. The Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) score was 33 (maximal attainable score of 38 indicates best performance). Neuropsychological assessment showed average to above-average performance in all cognitive domains, accounting for age and education. Results of his genetic testing for APOE were reported as follows: “This individual possesses an apolipoprotein E genotype (3 and 4) that indicates, with high specificity, that Alzheimer’s disease is the cause of or a contributor to the observed dementia.”

Author/s:

Choudhury, Parichita, Ramanan, Vijay K., Boeve, Bradley F.

Polypharmacy Management in Older Patients

Devin Evans — Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publication Date:

January 5, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

242-256

URL:

Polypharmacy Management in Older Patients

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.012

Keywords

PMID (1):

33413822

MeSH

A nice summary of the hazards, prevention, and management of polypharmacy in the elderly. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Medications to treat disease and extend life in our patients often amass in quantities, resulting in what has been termed "polypharmacy." This imprecise label usually describes the accumulation of 5, and often more, medications. Polypharmacy in advancing age frequently results in drug therapy problems related to interactions, drug toxicity, falls with injury, delirium, and nonadherence. Polypharmacy is associated with resulting increased hospitalizations and higher costs of care for individuals and health care systems. To reduce polypharmacy, we delineate a systematic, consultative approach to identify highest-risk medications and drug-therapy problems. We address strategic reductions (deprescribing) of medications in palliative care, long-term care, and ambulatory older adults. Best practices for reducing opioids, benzodiazepines, and other high-risk medications include education about risk and agreement by patients and their families, advocates, and care teams. Addressing deprescribing should be within the framework of patients' health status as their care and goals transition from longevity to a plan of maintaining alertness, comfort, and satisfaction of quality of life. A team approach to address polypharmacy and avoidance of high-risk therapy is optimal within long-term care. Patients with terminal illnesses or those moving toward a comfort-care emphasis benefit from medication adjustments that are recognized beneficially within each patient's care goals. In caring for older adults, the acknowledgement that complicated regimens and high-risk medications requires a care plan to reduce or prevent medication-related problems and costs that are associated with polypharmacy.

Author/s:

Hoel, Robert W., Giddings-Connolly, Ryan M., Takahashi, Paul Y.

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Opioids, Opioid Misuse and Opioid Use Disorder in Older Adults

Brian Desmarais — Sat, 07 Nov 2020 21:37:46 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Publication Date:

November 3, 2020

URL:

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Opioids, Opioid Misuse and Opioid Use Disorder in Older Adults

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

Keywords

MeSH

analgesics, non-narcotic

opioid-related disorders

Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs

analgesics, opioid

An AHRQ evidence review on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of opioid misuse. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Structured Abstract

Background. Opioid-related harms are increasing among older adults. Until we better understand the factors contributing to this trend, we will be unable to design and implement effective interventions to optimally manage opioid use and its potential harms among older adults. Although considerable research has been done in younger or mixed-age populations, the degree to which it is directly applicable to older adults is uncertain.

Objectives. To provide a framework for understanding how to reduce adverse outcomes of opioid use among older adults, and to describe the evidence available for different factors associated with and interventions to reduce adverse outcomes related to opioid use in this population.

Approach. With input from a diverse panel of content experts and other stakeholders, we developed a conceptual framework and evidence map to characterize empirical studies of factors associated with opioid-related outcomes and interventions to reduce opioid-related harms in older adults. We identified relevant literature among older adults (age ≥60 years) for an evidence map by systematically searching PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies published in English between 2000 and May 6, 2020.

Findings. We identified 5,933 citations, from which we identified 41 studies with multivariable models of factors associated with opioid-related outcomes and 16 studies of interventions in older adults. More than half (22/41) of the multivariable analysis studies evaluated factors associated with long-term opioid use (which, though not a harm per se, may increase the risk of harms if not appropriately managed). Prior or early postoperative opioid use, or greater amounts of prescribed opioids (high number of opioid prescriptions or higher opioid dose), were consistently (100% agreement) and strongly (measure of association ≥2.0) associated with long-term opioid use. Back pain, depression, concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and fibromyalgia also had consistent, but weaker, associations with long-term opioid use. Several factors were mostly associated (>75% agreement) with long-term opioid use, including benzodiazepine use, comorbidity scores, (generally undefined) substance misuse, tobacco use, and low income. However, studies were mostly consistent that alcohol abuse and healthcare utilization were not associated with long-term opioid use. Gender, age among older adults, Black race, dementia, rural/nonurban residence, prescription of long-acting opioids, unmarried status, and use of muscle relaxants were variably associated (<75% agreement) with long-term opioid use.

Six studies examined factors associated with opioid-related disorders, although only one study evaluated factors associated with opioid use disorder. Alcohol misuse and gender were variably associated with opioid misuse (examined by three studies each).

All other evaluations of specific pairs of associated factors and outcomes of interest were evaluated by only one or two studies each. These included analyses of factors associated with multiple opioid prescribers, mental health outcomes, physical health outcomes, all-cause hospitalization, opioid-related hospitalization, nonopioid-specific hospitalization, emergency department visits, opioid overdose, all-cause death, opioid-related death, and nonopioid-related death.

The evidence on interventions directed at older adults is sparse. Of the 16 studies of opioid-related interventions in older adults, six examined screening tools to predict opioid-related harms, but none of these tools was tested in clinical practice to assess real-world results. Two studies found that prescription drug monitoring programs are associated with less opioid use in communities. Other studied interventions include multidisciplinary pain education for patients, an educational pamphlet for patients, implementation of an opioid safety initiative, provision of patient information and pain management training for clinicians, a bundle of educational modalities for clinicians, free prescription acetaminophen, a nationally mandated tamper-resistant opioid formulation, and motivational interview training for nursing students. Few intervention studies evaluated pain or other patient-centered outcomes such as disability and functioning.

Conclusions. The evidence base that is directly applicable to older adults who are prescribed opioids or have opioid-related disorders is limited. Fundamental research is necessary to determine which factors may predict clinically important, patient-centered, opioid-related outcomes. Studies to date have identified numerous possible factors associated with long-term opioid use (whether appropriate or not), but analyses of other opioid-related outcomes in older adults are relatively sparse. Research is also needed to identify interventions to reduce opioid prescribing where harms outweigh benefits (including screening tools), reduce opioid-related harms and disorders, and treat existing misuse or opioid use disorder among older adults.

Author/s:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem. How the drive to prescribe is harming older adults.

Brian Desmarais — Mon, 01 Jul 2019 14:26:58 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Publisher:

Lown Institute

Publication Date:

July 1, 2019

URL:

Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem How the drive to prescribe is harming older adults

Type:

Public Health Announcements

Format:

Web Page

Keywords

MeSH

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

Daunorubicin

Etoposide

substance-related disorders

Polypharmacy is a major problem in the U.S. This report summarizes its magnitude, causes, and consequences. Other evidence suggests that when the number of meds increases beyond 4-5, any possible benefits are outweighed by the risks of adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Medication lists should include OTCs and should be updated at every visit. Patients should be strongly encouraged to bring their medication bottles with them to every visit. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

In the last year, older adults in the U.S. sought medical care nearly 5 million times due to serious side effects from one or more medications. More than a quarter million of these visits resulted in hospitalizations, at a cost of $3.8 billion (see Appendix A in the full report). These numbers point to a rapidly growing epidemic of medication overload among older Americans. Over the last decade, adults age 65 and older have been hospitalized for serious drug side effects, called adverse drug events (ADEs), about 2 million times. To put this in context, there were 3.2 million opioid-related hospitalizations across the entire population during the same period.1 The trend of increasing ADEs is not propelled by drug abuse, but by the rising number of medications prescribed to older adults (called “polypharmacy” in the scientific literature). More than 40 percent of older adults take five or more prescription medications a day, a threefold increase over the past two decades.2,3 The greater the number of medications—most of which are prescribed for legitimate reasons—the greater the risk for serious adverse reactions in older patients. Medication overload is causing widespread yet unseen harm to our parents and our grandparents. It is every bit as serious as the opioid crisis, yet its scope remains invisible to many patients and health care professionals. While some clinicians are trying to reduce the burden of medications on their individual patients, no professional group, public organization, or government agency to date has formally assumed responsibility for addressing this national problem. If current trends continue, we estimate that medication overload will be responsible for at least 4.6 million hospitalizations between 2020 and 2030. It will cost taxpayers, patients and families an estimated $62 billion. Over the next decade, medication overload is expected to cause the premature death of 150,000 older Americans. In this report, the Lown Institute calls for the development of a national strategy to address medication overload and help older people avoid its devastating effects on the quality and length of their lives. A subsequent National Action Plan for Addressing Medication Overload will lay out a national strategy to address the epidemic of prescribing and ensure the safety of millions of older adults who are now at risk of preventable harm and premature death.

Author/s:

Executive Summary of the Lown Institute

Legal Advocacy To Improve Care For Older Adults With Complex Needs

Brian Desmarais — Mon, 20 May 2019 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 20, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Health Affairs

Publication Date:

May 17, 2019

URL:

Legal Advocacy To Improve Care For Older Adults With Complex Needs

Type:

Public Health Announcements

Format:

Web Page

Keywords

MeSH

A review of the important underappreciated role of legal advocates in supporting health care-related needs of older adults. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Legal advocacy is a recognized strategy to address social factors that influence the health of populations with complex care needs. Such advocacy can improve housing stability, increase access to public benefits that support a host of social needs, assure that medical and financial proxy decision makers are in place, and reduce psychosocial distress.

Author/s:

Hooper, Sarah, Parekh, Ami, Fabiny, Anne, Teitelbaum, Joel

Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Tracy Ashby — Mon, 07 Jan 2019 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

March 6, 2018

Issue:

Volume:

319

Pages:

872-882

URL:

Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2018.0899

Keywords

PMID (1):

29509867

MeSH

Analgesics

analgesics, opioid

analgesics, non-narcotic

chronic pain

osteoarthritis, knee

In this RCT, comparing non-opioids to opioids for management of chronic pain in the lower back or knee due to OA the researchers found that non-opioid medications were more effective for relieving pain with fewer side effects.

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Importance Limited evidence is available regarding long-term outcomes of opioids compared with nonopioid medications for chronic pain.

Objective To compare opioid vs nonopioid medications over 12 months on pain-related function, pain intensity, and adverse effects.

Design, Setting, and Participants Pragmatic, 12-month, randomized trial with masked outcome assessment. Patients were recruited from Veterans Affairs primary care clinics from June 2013 through December 2015; follow-up was completed December 2016. Eligible patients had moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain despite analgesic use. Of 265 patients enrolled, 25 withdrew prior to randomization and 240 were randomized.

Interventions Both interventions (opioid and nonopioid medication therapy) followed a treat-to-target strategy aiming for improved pain and function. Each intervention had its own prescribing strategy that included multiple medication options in 3 steps. In the opioid group, the first step was immediate-release morphine, oxycodone, or hydrocodone/acetaminophen. For the nonopioid group, the first step was acetaminophen (paracetamol) or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Medications were changed, added, or adjusted within the assigned treatment group according to individual patient response.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was pain-related function (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] interference scale) over 12 months and the main secondary outcome was pain intensity (BPI severity scale). For both BPI scales (range, 0-10; higher scores = worse function or pain intensity), a 1-point improvement was clinically important. The primary adverse outcome was medication-related symptoms (patient-reported checklist; range, 0-19).

Results Among 240 randomized patients (mean age, 58.3 years; women, 32 [13.0%]), 234 (97.5%) completed the trial. Groups did not significantly differ on pain-related function over 12 months (overall P = .58); mean 12-month BPI interference was 3.4 for the opioid group and 3.3 for the nonopioid group (difference, 0.1 [95% CI, −0.5 to 0.7]). Pain intensity was significantly better in the nonopioid group over 12 months (overall P = .03); mean 12-month BPI severity was 4.0 for the opioid group and 3.5 for the nonopioid group (difference, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.0]). Adverse medication-related symptoms were significantly more common in the opioid group over 12 months (overall P = .03); mean medication-related symptoms at 12 months were 1.8 in the opioid group and 0.9 in the nonopioid group (difference, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 1.5]).

Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with opioids was not superior to treatment with nonopioid medications for improving pain-related function over 12 months. Results do not support initiation of opioid therapy for moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain.

Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01583985

Author/s:

Krebs, Erin E., Gravely, Amy, Nugent, Sean, Jensen, Agnes C., DeRonne, Beth, Goldsmith, Elizabeth S., Kroenke, Kurt, Bair, Matthew J, Noorbaloochi, Siamak