anxiety

Importance Anxiety disorders and symptoms are prevalent and burdensome, and patients are most likely to seek treatment in primary care settings. However, anxiety is underdetected and undertreated. This narrative review details behavioral and pharmacological treatment options that are feasible and effective in primary care.

Observations Screening for anxiety is recommended for primary care patients younger than 65 years. Given that anxiety often involves somatic symptoms, assessment should include patient-reported symptom measures, clinical interview, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests. For subthreshold symptoms (those that do not meet diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders) and adjustment-related anxiety, starting with self-help and behavioral treatment is recommended. When deciding between behavioral, pharmacological, or combined treatment for anxiety disorders, consider the presentation, patient preferences, potential adverse effects, and treatment history, and engage in shared decision-making. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line behavioral treatment for anxiety. Brief CBT in primary care delivered by embedded behavioral health clinicians is effective. First-line pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders includes several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, which tend to be well tolerated without considerable long-term adverse effects. The main decision for pharmacological treatment is between a daily medication and a short-acting medication taken as needed for intermittent symptoms or while awaiting the effect of a daily medication. Benzodiazepines are not recommended due to risk of adverse effects, especially with long-term use. The Collaborative Care Management model, which involves collaboration between primary care clinicians, consulting psychiatrists, and care managers who monitor patient progress and provide behavioral treatment, improves anxiety outcomes compared to usual primary care.

Conclusions and Relevance Clinicians should recognize common anxiety presentations and understand how to differentiate between anxiety and other psychiatric or medical conditions. Referring patients to behavioral health specialists for CBT and/or prescribing recommended pharmacotherapy with Collaborative Care Management can help to reduce patient morbidity and improve functioning.

Author/s:

Robyn L. Shepardson, Jeffrey S. Khan, Katherine A. Buckheit

I’m Concerned About Anxiety—What Do I Need to Know?

Megan George — Tue, 05 May 2026 13:36:49 +0000

Date Added:

May 5, 2026

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

May 4, 2026

URL:

I’m Concerned About Anxiety—What Do I Need to Know?

Type:

Patient Education Materials

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0392

Keywords

PMID (1):

42081216

MeSH

Information for patients about the causes and management of anxiety. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

What Is Anxiety?
Anxiety is a normal experience of worry or fear about something the body or mind interprets as threatening. Anxiety may show up in your thoughts, emotions, body sensations, or behaviors (like worrying, feeling nervous, sweaty palms, and avoiding certain situations).

Author/s:

Robyn L. Shepardson, Jeffrey S. Khan, Jennifer S. Funderburk

I’m Concerned About Anxiety—What Do I Need to Know?

Megan George — Tue, 05 May 2026 13:35:29 +0000

Date Added:

May 5, 2026

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

May 4, 2026

URL:

I’m Concerned About Anxiety—What Do I Need to Know?

Type:

Patient Education Materials

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0392

Keywords

PMID (1):

42081216

MeSH

Information for patients about the causes and management of anxiety. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Author/s:

Robyn L. Shepardson, Jeffrey S. Khan, Jennifer S. Funderburk

Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion

Erin Blanchette — Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:11:24 +0000

Date Added:

March 24, 2025

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Publisher:

American Board of Family Medicine

Publication Date:

November 1, 2024

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

1150-1155

URL:

Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.3122/jabfm.2024.240079R1

Keywords

PMID (1):

40118554

MeSH

Intrauterine Devices* / adverse effects

Intrauterine Devices

female

Contraceptive Agents, Female

Pain / prevention & control

pain management

Lidocaine

Prilocaine Drug Combination

An evidence-based review of methods for reducing pain during IUD insertion. Many of these would probably work as well for other painful procedures. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most effective, long-lasting, and convenient contraceptive methods available in the United States. Unfortunately, the anticipated pain and anxiety associated with an IUD insertion procedure deter many people from using this contraceptive method.

Methods: A literature review was conducted on PubMed by searching the terms “IUD insertion”, “pain management”, “anxiety”, “gynecologic procedures”. The Cochrane database was also searched for reviews about pain management methods during IUD insertions. Findings were summarized using the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) scale.

Results: Pharmacologic methods that can be used to reduce pain with IUD insertion include naproxen, tramadol, lidocaine paracervical blocks, 10% lidocaine spray, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and EMLA cream. Non-pharmacologic methods for reducing pain or anxiety during gynecologic procedures include pre-insertion counseling, “verbal analgesia”, lavender aromatherapy, distraction with music or television, using Valsalva maneuver instead of tenaculum during IUD insertion, and use of heating pad during procedure.

Conclusion: Moderately effective pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic methods exist for reducing pain and anxiety with IUD insertion. These treatment methods should be offered to create a more comfortable experience for patients. Additional research is needed to determine the comparative efficacy of these methods.

Author/s:

Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Petra Kelsey, Ann E Evensen

A GUIDE to help patients and families better understand serious illnesses: Mnemonic device provides way to teach learners about advance care planning

Erin Blanchette — Sun, 04 Feb 2024 22:49:57 +0000

Date Added:

February 4, 2024

Journal/Publication:

Canadian Family Physician

Publisher:

College of Family Physicians of Canada

Publication Date:

January 1, 2024

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

68-70

URL:

A GUIDE to help patients and families better understand serious illnesses: Mnemonic device provides way to teach learners about advance care planning

Type:

Clinical Decision Aids, Best Local Practices

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.46747/cfp.700168

Keywords

advance care planning

PMID (1):

38262750

MeSH

Advance Care Planning

patients

terminal care

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

life expectancy

anxiety

Explanation of how to use illness trajectory graphs to guide advance care planning in people with serious illnesses. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Advance care planning (ACP) was identified as a priority in the 2006 final report of the Public Information and Awareness Working Group of the Canadian Strategy on Palliative and End-of-Life Care.1 An important component of ACP is patients’ understanding of their prognoses, which might include expectations related to future function, symptoms, and life expectancy.2-4 Without realistic prognostic information, patients are at risk of not engaging in ACP that would otherwise help them gain control over their illnesses, reduce anxiety, and avoid unwanted treatments.2,3,5 Moreover, lack of that information might lead to challenging downstream goals-of-care conversations. In guidance published in 2023 regarding a physician’s duty to discuss a patient’s medical condition and prognosis during a goals-of-care discussion when the physician deems cardiopulmonary resuscitation not to be indicated, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario highlighted the importance of physicians being able to communicate prognoses skillfully.6

Author/s:

Helen James, Warren Harris Lewin

Effect of Psychological and Medication Therapies for Insomnia on Daytime Functions: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Erin Blanchette — Sun, 07 Jan 2024 19:56:39 +0000

Date Added:

January 7, 2024

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Network Open

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

December 28, 2023

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

Effect of Psychological and Medication Therapies for Insomnia on Daytime Functions: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49638

Keywords

cognitive behavior therapy

PMID (1):

38153735

MeSH

behavior therapy

fatigue

sleep initiation and maintenance disorders

Cognitive behavioral therapy and zolpidem improve daytime functioning and symptoms equally. The combination further improves outcomes in those with inadequate response to either alone. James W. Mold, MD, MPH.

Free full text

View

Importance: Daytime functional impairments are the primary reasons for patients with insomnia to seek treatment, yet little is known about what the optimal treatment is for improving daytime functions and how best to proceed with treatment for patients whose insomnia has not remitted.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of behavioral therapy (BT) and zolpidem as initial therapies for improving daytime functions among patients with insomnia and evaluate the added value of a second treatment for patients whose insomnia has not remitted.

Design, setting, and participants: In this sequential multiple-assignment randomized clinical trial conducted at institutions in Canada and the US, 211 adults with chronic insomnia disorder were enrolled between May 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, and followed up for 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis in April and October 2023.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to either BT or zolpidem as first-stage therapy, and those whose insomnia had not remitted received a second-stage psychological therapy (BT or cognitive therapy) or medication therapy (zolpidem or trazodone).

Main outcomes and measures: Study outcomes were daytime symptoms of insomnia, including mood disturbances, fatigue, functional impairments of insomnia, and scores on the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical and mental health components.

Results: Among 211 adults with insomnia (132 women [63%]; mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.9] years), 104 were allocated to BT and 107 to zolpidem at the first stage. First-stage treatment with BT or zolpidem yielded significant and equivalent benefits for most of the daytime outcomes, including depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II mean score change, -3.5 [95% CI, -4.7 to -2.3] vs -4.3 [95% CI, -5.7 to -2.9]), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mean score change, -4.7 [95% CI, -7.3 to -2.2] vs -5.2 [95% CI, -7.9 to -2.5]), functional impairments (Work and Social Adjustment Scale mean score change, -5.0 [95% CI, -6.7 to -3.3] vs -5.1 [95% CI, -7.2 to -2.9]), and mental health (SF-36 mental health subscale mean score change, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.9-5.1] vs 2.5 [95% CI, 0.4-4.5]), while BT produced larger improvements for anxiety symptoms relative to zolpidem (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory mean score change, -4.1 [95% CI, -5.8 to -2.4] vs -1.2 [95% CI, -3.0 to 0.5]; P = .02; Cohen d = 0.55). Second-stage therapy produced additional improvements for the 2 conditions starting with zolpidem at posttreatment in fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, -3.8 [95% CI, -7.1 to -0.4]; zolpidem plus trazodone, -3.7 [95% CI, -6.3 to -1.1]), functional impairments (Work and Social Adjustment Scale mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, -3.7 [95% CI, -6.4 to -1.0]; zolpidem plus trazodone, -3.3 [95% CI, -5.9 to -0.7]) and mental health (SF-36 mental health subscale mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, 5.3 [95% CI, 2.7-7.9]; zolpidem plus trazodone, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.1-4.0]). Treatment benefits achieved at posttreatment were well maintained throughout the 12-month follow-up, and additional improvements were noted for patients receiving the BT treatment sequences.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adults with insomnia disorder, BT and zolpidem produced improvements for various daytime symptoms of insomnia that were no different between treatments. Adding a second treatment offered an added value with further improvements of daytime functions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01651442.

Author/s:

Charles M Morin, Si-Jing Chen, Hans Ivers, Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau, Andrew D Krystal, Bernard Guay, Lynda Bélanger, Ann Cartwright, Bryan Simmons, Manon Lamy, Mindy Busby, Jack D Edinger

Postpartum Depression-New Screening Recommendations and Treatments

Erin Blanchette — Tue, 05 Dec 2023 20:35:41 +0000

Date Added:

December 5, 2023

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

November 27, 2023

URL:

Postpartum Depression-New Screening Recommendations and Treatments

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2023.21311

Keywords

Depressive Disorders

Pregnancy

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Women's Health

Postpartum Depression

PMID (1):

38010647

MeSH

A summary of current recommendations regarding detection and treatment of postpartum depression. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Perinatal mental health conditions are those that occur during pregnancy and the year following childbirth, whether onset of the condition(s) predates pregnancy or occurs in the perinatal period. Perinatal mental health conditions are the leading cause of overall and preventable maternal mortality and include a wide array of mental health conditions including anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders. Perinatal depression specifically affects 1 in 7 perinatal individuals. While commonly referred to as postpartum depression, it is more accurately called perinatal depression because its onset corresponds with prepregnancy (27%), pregnancy (33%), and postpartum (40%) time frames.

Author/s:

Tiffany A Moore Simas, Anna Whelan, Nancy Byatt

Screening for Anxiety Disorders in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Aubrey Delammermore — Sat, 24 Jun 2023 22:55:19 +0000

Date Added:

June 24, 2023

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

June 20, 2023

URL:

Screening for Anxiety Disorders in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2023.9301

Keywords

PMID (1):

37338866

MeSH

The USPSTF recommends screening all adults under 65 for anxiety disorders. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Anxiety disorders are commonly occurring mental health conditions. They are often unrecognized in primary care settings and substantial delays in treatment initiation occur.

Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for anxiety disorders in asymptomatic adults.

Population: Asymptomatic adults 19 years or older, including pregnant and postpartum persons. Older adults are defined as those 65 years or older.

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for anxiety disorders in adults, including pregnant and postpartum persons, has a moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient on screening for anxiety disorders in older adults.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for anxiety disorders in adults, including pregnant and postpartum persons. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for anxiety disorders in older adults. (I statement).

Author/s:

US Preventive Services Task Force, Barry, M. J., Nicholson, W. K., Silverstein, M., Coker, T. R., Davidson, K. W., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Jaén, C. R., Li, L., Ogedegbe, G., Pbert, L., Roa, G., Ruiz, J. M., Stevermer, J., Tsevat, J., Underwood, S. M., Wong, J. B.

The frequency and impact of undiagnosed benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in outpatients with high falls risk

Bethie Seay — Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

November 18, 2021

Journal/Publication:

British Geriatrics Society

Publication Date:

June 11, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

2025-2030

Type:

Clinical Research Results

DOI (1):

10.1093/ageing/afab122

MeSH

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Accidental Falls

Social Isolation

Cross-Sectional Studies

Benign positional vertigo may be a more common cause of falls in older people than we thought. It’s certainly worth looking for since it is treatable.

View

Background
The frequency and impact of undiagnosed benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in people identified with high falls risk has not been investigated.

Objective
To determine the frequency and impact on key psychosocial measures of undiagnosed BPPV in adult community rehabilitation outpatients identified with a high falls risk.

Design
A frequency study with cross-sectional design.

Setting
A Community Rehabilitation Program in Melbourne, Australia.

Subjects
Adult community rehabilitation outpatients with a Falls Risk for Older People in the Community Screen score of four or higher.

Methods
BPPV was assessed in 34 consecutive high falls risk rehabilitation outpatients using the Dix–Hallpike test and supine roll test. Participants were assessed for anxiety, depression, fear of falls, social isolation and loneliness using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale-International and De Jong Gierveld 6-Item Loneliness Scale.

Results
A total of 18 (53%; 95% confidence interval: 36, 70) participants tested positive for BPPV. There was no significant difference between those who tested positive for BPPV and those who did not for Falls Risk for Older People in the Community Screen scores (P = 0.555), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Anxiety) scores (P = 0.627), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Depression) scores (P = 0.368) or Falls Efficacy Scale-International scores (P = 0.481). Higher scores for the De Jong Gierveld 6-Item Loneliness Scale in participants with BPPV did not reach significance (P = 0.056).

Conclusions
Undiagnosed BPPV is very common and associated with a trend towards increased loneliness in adult rehabilitation outpatients identified as having a high falls risk.

Author/s:

Hawke, L. J., Barr, C. J., McLoughlin, J. V.

Incidence, co-occurrence, and evolution of long-COVID features: A 6-month retrospective cohort study of 273,618 survivors of COVID-19

Bethie Seay — Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

October 5, 2021

Journal/Publication:

PLOS Medicine

Publication Date:

September 28, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

Type:

Clinical Research Results

DOI (1):

10.1371/journal.pmed.1003773

An assessment of the epidemiology and characteristics of long COVID syndrome from nearly 275,000 linked electronic records.

View

Background
Long-COVID refers to a variety of symptoms affecting different organs reported by people following Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. To date, there have been no robust estimates of the incidence and co-occurrence of long-COVID features, their relationship to age, sex, or severity of infection, and the extent to which they are specific to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to address these issues.

Methods and findings
We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on linked electronic health records (EHRs) data from 81 million patients including 273,618 COVID-19 survivors. The incidence and co-occurrence within 6 months and in the 3 to 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis were calculated for 9 core features of long-COVID (breathing difficulties/breathlessness, fatigue/malaise, chest/throat pain, headache, abdominal symptoms, myalgia, other pain, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety/depression). Their co-occurrence network was also analyzed. Comparison with a propensity score–matched cohort of patients diagnosed with influenza during the same time period was achieved using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model. The incidence of atopic dermatitis was used as a negative control.

Among COVID-19 survivors (mean [SD] age: 46.3 [19.8], 55.6% female), 57.00% had one or more long-COVID feature recorded during the whole 6-month period (i.e., including the acute phase), and 36.55% between 3 and 6 months. The incidence of each feature was: abnormal breathing (18.71% in the 1- to 180-day period; 7.94% in the 90- to180-day period), fatigue/malaise (12.82%; 5.87%), chest/throat pain (12.60%; 5.71%), headache (8.67%; 4.63%), other pain (11.60%; 7.19%), abdominal symptoms (15.58%; 8.29%), myalgia (3.24%; 1.54%), cognitive symptoms (7.88%; 3.95%), and anxiety/depression (22.82%; 15.49%). All 9 features were more frequently reported after COVID-19 than after influenza (with an overall excess incidence of 16.60% and hazard ratios between 1.44 and 2.04, all p < 0.001), co-occurred more commonly, and formed a more interconnected network. Significant differences in incidence and co-occurrence were associated with sex, age, and illness severity. Besides the limitations inherent to EHR data, limitations of this study include that (i) the findings do not generalize to patients who have had COVID-19 but were not diagnosed, nor to patients who do not seek or receive medical attention when experiencing symptoms of long-COVID; (ii) the findings say nothing about the persistence of the clinical features; and (iii) the difference between cohorts might be affected by one cohort seeking or receiving more medical attention for their symptoms.

Conclusions
Long-COVID clinical features occurred and co-occurred frequently and showed some specificity to COVID-19, though they were also observed after influenza. Different long-COVID clinical profiles were observed based on demographics and illness severity.

Author summary
Why was this study done?
Long-COVID has been described in recent studies. But we do not know the risk of developing features of this condition and how it is affected by factors such as age, sex, or severity of infection.
We do not know if the risk of having features of long-COVID is more likely after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) than after influenza.
We do not know about the extent to which different features of long-COVID co-occur.
What did the researchers do and find?
This research used data from electronic health records of 273,618 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and estimated the risk of having long-COVID features in the 6 months after a diagnosis of COVID-19. It compared the risk of long-COVID features in different groups within the population and also compared the risk to that after influenza.
The research found that over 1 in 3 patients had one or more features of long-COVID recorded between 3 and 6 months after a diagnosis of COVID-19. This was significantly higher than after influenza.
For 2 in 5 of the patients who had long-COVID features in the 3- to 6-month period, they had no record of any such feature in the previous 3 months.
The risk of long-COVID features was higher in patients who had more severe COVID-19 illness, and slightly higher among females and young adults. White and non-white patients were equally affected.
What do these findings mean?
Knowing the risk of long-COVID features helps in planning the relevant healthcare service provision.
The fact that the risk is higher after COVID-19 than after influenza suggests that their origin might, in part, directly involve infection with SARS-CoV-2 and is not just a general consequence of viral infection. This might help in developing effective treatments against long-COVID.
The findings in the subgroups, and the fact that the majority of patients who have features of long-COVID in the 3- to 6-month period already had symptoms in the first 3 months, may help in identifying those at greatest risk.

Author/s:

Taquet, M., Dercon, Q., Luciano, S., Geddes, J. R., Husain, M., Harrison, P. J.

Maintenance or Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Primary Care

Bethie Seay — Sun, 03 Oct 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

October 3, 2021

Journal/Publication:

The New England Journal of Medicine

Publication Date:

September 30, 2021

Type:

Clinical Research Results

DOI (1):

10.1056/NEJMoa2106356

In patients whose depression resolved on antidepressants, discontinuation of the antidepressant is associated with a significantly higher rate of depression reoccurrence vs. maintenance antidepressant therapy over a one year period.

View

BACKGROUND
Patients with depression who are treated in primary care practices may receive antidepressants for prolonged periods. Data are limited on the effects of maintaining or discontinuing antidepressant therapy in this setting.

METHODS
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial involving adults who were being treated in 150 general practices in the United Kingdom. All the patients had a history of at least two depressive episodes or had been taking antidepressants for 2 years or longer and felt well enough to consider stopping antidepressants. Patients who had received citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, or mirtazapine were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to maintain their current antidepressant therapy (maintenance group) or to taper and discontinue such therapy with the use of matching placebo (discontinuation group). The primary outcome was the first relapse of depression during the 52-week trial period, as evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. Secondary outcomes were depressive and anxiety symptoms, physical and withdrawal symptoms, quality of life, time to stopping an antidepressant or placebo, and global mood ratings.

RESULTS
A total of 1466 patients underwent screening. Of these patients, 478 were enrolled in the trial (238 in the maintenance group and 240 in the discontinuation group). The average age of the patients was 54 years; 73% were women. Adherence to the trial assignment was 70% in the maintenance group and 52% in the discontinuation group. By 52 weeks, relapse occurred in 92 of 238 patients (39%) in the maintenance group and in 135 of 240 (56%) in the discontinuation group (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 2.70; P<0.001). Secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as the primary outcome. Patients in the discontinuation group had more symptoms of depression, anxiety, and withdrawal than those in the maintenance group.

CONCLUSIONS
Among patients in primary care practices who felt well enough to discontinue antidepressant therapy, those who were assigned to stop their medication had a higher risk of relapse of depression by 52 weeks than those who were assigned to maintain their current therapy. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ANTLER ISRCTN number, ISRCTN15969819.)

Author/s:

Lewis, G., Marston, L., Duffy, L., Freemantle, N., Gilbody, S., Hunter, R., Kendrick, T., Kessler, D., Mangin, D., King, M., Lanham, P., Moore, M.

Post COVID-19 Syndrome (Long Haul Syndrome): Description of a Multidisciplinary Clinic at the Mayo Clinic and Characteristics of the Initial Patient Cohort

Saige Blanchard — Tue, 18 May 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 18, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publisher:

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

Publication Date:

April 30, 2021

URL:

Post COVID-19 Syndrome (Long Haul Syndrome): Description of a Multidisciplinary Clinic at the Mayo Clinic and Characteristics of the Initial Patient Cohort

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.024

Keywords

MeSH

preexisting condition coverage

A description of adult patients with COVID-19 “long-haul syndrome” being seen at the Mayo Clinic.

James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Objective

To describe characteristics of a series of patients reporting prolonged symptoms after an infection with COVID-19.

Methods

This study describes the multidisciplinary COVID-19 Activity Rehabilitation Program (CARP), established at Mayo Clinic to evaluate and treat post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) patients, and reports the clinical characteristics of the first 100 patients receiving evaluation and management during the timeframe of June 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020.

Results

The cohort consisted of 100 patients (mean age 45 years, 68% women, BMI 30.2, presenting a mean of 93 days after infection). Common pre-existing conditions were respiratory (23%) and mental health, including depression and/or anxiety (34%.) The majority (75%) had not been hospitalized for COVID-19. Common presenting symptoms ware fatigue (80%), respiratory complaints (59%), and neurologic complaints (59%) followed by subjective cognitive impairment, sleep disturbance, and mental health symptoms. More than one-third of the patients (34%) reported difficulties with performing basic activities of daily living. Only 1 in 3 patients had returned to unrestricted work duty at the time of the analysis. For most patients, laboratory and imaging studies were normal or non-diagnostic despite debilitating symptoms. Most patients required physical therapy, occupational therapy, or brain rehabilitation. Face-to-face and virtual care delivery modalities were feasible.

Conclusion

Many of the patients did not experience COVID-19-related symptoms that were severe enough to require hospitalization, were younger than 65 years of age, more likely to be female, and most had no pre-existing comorbidities prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptoms including mood disorders, fatigue, and perceived cognitive impairment resulted in severe negative impacts on resumption of functional and occupational activities in patients experiencing prolonged effects.

Author/s:

Vanichkachorn, G., Newcomb, R., Cowl, C. T., Trenary, M., Higgins, S., Neveau, D., Murad, M. H., Breeher, L., Miller, S.

How to raise kids who can overcome anxiety

Brian Desmarais — Thu, 28 May 2020 19:45:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 28, 2020

Journal/Publication:

TEDMED

Publisher:

TEDMED Foundation

Publication Date:

May 1, 2020

URL:

How to raise kids who can overcome anxiety

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Video

Keywords

MeSH

parent-child relations

This 15 minute video could be very helpful to clinicians who care for children. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Not available.

Author/s:

Albano, A.M.

Cannabidiol (CBD) - What we know and what we don't

Jeffrey Wilson — Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:32:45 +0000

Date Added:

April 24, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Harvard Health Blog

Publisher:

Harvard University

Publication Date:

August 24, 2018

URL:

Cannabidiol (CBD) - What we know and what we don't

Type:

Patient Education Materials

Format:

Web Page

Keywords

MeSH

sleep initiation and maintenance disorders

chronic pain

This patient-friendly review of what we currently know about CBD includes a warning that CBD oil reduces the metabolism of warfarin and other drugs metabolized by the CYP450 enzyme system (the same system affected by grapefruit juice) causing elevation of the INR and increased risk of bleeding. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Cannabidiol (CBD) has been recently covered in the media, and you may have even seen it as an add-in booster to your post-workout smoothie or morning coffee. What exactly is CBD? Why is it suddenly so popular?

Author/s:

Grinspoon, Peter

Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jeffrey Wilson — Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:56:30 +0000

Date Added:

February 24, 2019

Journal/Publication:

The Lancet

Publisher:

Elsevier

Publication Date:

January 31, 2019

Issue:

10173

Volume:

393

Pages:

768-777

URL:

Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31793-8

Keywords

anxiety

global anxiety disorder

PMID (1):

30712879

MeSH

This is a systematic review of the evidence available on treatment of global anxiety disorder.

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

BACKGROUND:

Generalised anxiety disorder is a disease that can be associated with substantial dysfunction. Pharmacological treatment is often the first choice for clinicians because of the cost and resource constraints of psychological alternatives, but there is a paucity of comparative information for the multiple available drug choices.

METHODS:

A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed on randomised trials in adult outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder identified from MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Drugs@FDA and commercial pharmaceutical registries. Placebo and active control trials were included. Data were extracted from all manuscripts and reports. Primary outcomes were efficacy (mean difference [MD] in change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale Score) and acceptability (study discontinuations for any cause). We estimated summary mean treatment differences and odds ratios using network meta-analyses with random effects. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018087106.

FINDINGS:

Studies were published between Jan 1, 1994 and Aug 1, 2017, in which 1992 potential studies were screened for inclusion. This analysis is based on 89 trials, which included 25 441 patients randomly assigned to 22 different active drugs or placebo. Duloxetine (MD -3·13, 95% credible interval [CrI] -4·13 to -2·13), pregabalin (MD -2·79, 95% CrI -3·69 to -1·91), venlafaxine (MD -2·69, 95% CrI -3·50 to -1·89), and escitalopram (MD -2·45, 95% CrI -3·27 to -1·63) were more efficacious than placebo with relatively good acceptability. Mirtazapine, sertraline, fluoxetine, buspirone, and agomelatine were also found to be efficacious and well tolerated but these findings were limited by small sample sizes. Quetiapine (MD -3·60 95% CrI -4·83 to -2·39) had the largest effect on HAM-A but it was poorly tolerated (odds ratio 1·44, 95% CrI 1·16-1·80) when compared with placebo. Likewise, paroxetine and benzodiazepines were effective but also poorly tolerated when compared with placebo. Risk of reporting bias was considered low, and when possible all completed studies were included to avoid publication bias.

INTERPRETATION:

To our knowledge, this is the largest contemporary review of pharmacological agents for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder by use of networkanalysis. There are several effective treatment choices for generalised anxiety disorder across classes of medication. The failure of initial pharmacological therapy might not be a reason to abandon a pharmacological treatment strategy.

Author/s:

Slee, April, Nazareth, Irwin, Bondaronek, Paulina, Liu, Yifeng, Cheng, Zhihang, Freemantle, Nick