attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity

Objectives. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common pediatric neurobehavioral disorder often treated in the primary care setting. This systematic review updates and extends two previous Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) systematic evidence reviews and focuses on the comparative effectiveness of methods to establish the diagnosis of ADHD, updates the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, and evaluates different monitoring strategies in the primary care setting for individuals from birth through 17 years of age.

Data sources. We searched PubMed®, Embase®, PsycINFO®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant English-language studies published from January 1, 2011, through November 7, 2016.

Review methods. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted the data, and performed quality ratings and evidence grading. Random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects when sufficient data were available for meta-analysis.

Results. Evidence was contributed from 103 articles describing 90 unique studies. Twenty-one studies related to diagnosis, 69 studies related to treatment, and no studies were identified on monitoring. The Attention and Executive Function Rating Inventory and Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory performed better than the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery for the diagnosis of ADHD for ages 7–17 years (strength of evidence [SOE]=low). Evidence was insufficient on the use of electroencephalography (EEG) or neuroimaging to establish the diagnosis of ADHD for ages 7–17 years. No studies directly assessed the harms to children labeled as having ADHD. Limited additional evidence published since the original 2011 report was available on ADHD medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compared with placebo or compared to different FDA-approved ADHD medications (SOE=insufficient). For atomoxetine and methylphenidate, the most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence and mild gastrointestinal problems. Atomoxetine had slightly higher gastrointestinal effects than methylphenidate (SOE=low). Cognitive behavioral therapy improved ADHD symptoms (SOE=low). Child or parent training improved ADHD symptoms (SOE=moderate) but made no difference in academic performance (SOE=low). Omega-3/6 fatty acid supplementation made no difference in ADHD symptoms (SOE=moderate). Across all treatments, little evidence was reported on the risk of serious adverse events, including cardiovascular risk.

Conclusions. The 2011 AHRQ systematic review highlighted the benefit of psychostimulants for children 6–12 years of age with ADHD for up to 24 months and found that adding psychosocial/behavioral interventions to psychostimulants is more effective than psychosocial/behavioral interventions alone for children with ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder. This targeted update found insufficient evidence regarding new approaches to the diagnosis (e.g., EEGs, neuroimaging). Little is known about the impact of being labeled as having ADHD. Although cognitive behavioral therapy or child or parent training may decrease symptoms of ADHD, more information is needed regarding the relative benefit of these approaches compared to, or combined with, medication treatment. Omega-3/6 supplementation does not appear to improve ADHD outcomes. No information was identified regarding the optimal strategy for monitoring after diagnosis.

Author/s:

Kemper, AR, Maslow, GR, Hill, S, Namdari, B, Allen LaPoint, NM, Goode, AP, Coeytaux, RR, Befus, D, Kosinski, AS, Bowen, SE, McBroom, AJ, Lallinger, KR, Sanders, GD

The efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements in the treatment of mental disorders: a meta-review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

John Bayhi — Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:29:29 +0000

Date Added:

September 13, 2019

Journal/Publication:

World Psychiatry

Publisher:

World Psychiatric Association

Publication Date:

October 1, 2019

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

308-324

URL:

The efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements in the treatment of mental disorders: a meta-review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1002/wps.20672

Keywords

depression

dietary supplements

mineral supplements

attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity

omega-3 fatty acids

PMID (1):

31496103

MeSH

depressive disorder, major

depression

attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity

mood disorders

mental health

folic acid

eicosapentaenoic acid

fatty acids

unsaturated

Several nutritional supplements appear to be helpful in the treatment of some mental health problems. The strongest evidence was found for eicosapentaenoic acid (an omega 3 fatty acid) as an adjunctive treatment for depression. More nascent evidence suggested that PUFAs may also be beneficial for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. High‐dose methylfolate appears to be helpful as an adjunct to antidepressants and counseling in major depressive disorder. There was emergent evidence for N‐acetylcysteine as a useful adjunctive treatment in mood disorders and schizophrenia. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

The role of nutrition in mental health is becoming increasingly acknowledged. Along with dietary intake, nutrition can also be obtained from "nutrient supplements", such as polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, amino acids and pre/probiotic supplements. Recently, a large number of meta-analyses have emerged examining nutrient supplements in the treatment of mental disorders. To produce a meta-review of this top-tier evidence, we identified, synthesized and appraised all meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements in common and severe mental disorders. Our systematic search identified 33 meta-analyses of placebo-controlled RCTs, with primary analyses including outcome data from 10,951 individuals. The strongest evidence was found for PUFAs (particularly as eicosapentaenoic acid) as an adjunctive treatment for depression. More nascent evidence suggested that PUFAs may also be beneficial for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, whereas there was no evidence for schizophrenia. Folate-based supplements were widely researched as adjunctive treatments for depression and schizophrenia, with positive effects from RCTs of high-dose methylfolate in major depressive disorder. There was emergent evidence for N-acetylcysteine as a useful adjunctive treatment in mood disorders and schizophrenia. All nutrient supplements had good safety profiles, with no evidence of serious adverse effects or contraindications with psychiatric medications. In conclusion, clinicians should be informed of the nutrient supplements with established efficacy for certain conditions (such as eicosapentaenoic acid in depression), but also made aware of those currently lacking evidentiary support. Future research should aim to determine which individuals may benefit most from evidence-based supplements, to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Author/s:

Firth, J, Teasdale, SB, Allott, K, Siskind, D, Marx, W, Cotter, J, Veronese, N, Schuch, F, Smith, L, Solmi, M, Carvalho, AF, Vancampfort, D, Berk, M, Stubbs, B, Sarris, J

Treatment of Adult ADHD: A Clinical Perspective

Jeffrey Wilson — Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:28:31 +0000

Date Added:

February 24, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology

Publisher:

Sage

Publication Date:

January 1, 2018

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

25-32

URL:

Treatment of Adult ADHD: A Clinical Perspective

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1177/2045125317734977

Keywords

ADD

ADHD

attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity

PMID (1):

29344341

MeSH

attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity

anxiety

This is a nice review of the treatment options for adults with ADHD.

Free full text

Adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has moved from the blurred edge of clinical focus to clear recognition as a prevalent and significant disorder in its own right. It is a relatively common comorbidity which if identified and treated may open the door to better outcomes for hard-to-treat patients. Conversely, failure to identify and treat adult ADHD is linked to negative outcomes. The recognition of the importance of adult ADHD in a subset of our patients challenges us to overcome our anxiety about this diagnosis and prevent the societal marginalization of vulnerable patients. Adult ADHD responds well to integrated pharmacological and psychotherapeutic intervention. Its treatment responsiveness reduces disability and allows the comorbidity which is typically present to be addressed. Mastering this challenge can make the diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD a rewarding experience.

Author/s:

Geffen, Josh, Forster, Kieran