heart failure

What Is Atrial Fibrillation?

aged

In patients over the age of 70 who experience a heart attack, it appears that non-intervention is as good as early intervention considering the increased risk of bleeding. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: The optimal management strategy for older patients who present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unclear due to a paucity of randomized evidence. New large and longer-term randomized data are available.

Objective: To test the association of an early invasive strategy vs a conservative strategy with clinical outcomes for patients 70 years or older who present with ACS.

Data sources: A literature search strategy was designed in collaboration with a medical librarian. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched ,with no language restrictions from inception through October 2024. Bibliographies of previous reviews and conference abstracts from major cardiovascular scientific meetings were handsearched.

Study selection: Studies were deemed eligible following review by 2 independent, masked investigators if they randomly allocated patients 70 years or older who presented with ACS to early invasive or conservative management and reported clinical end points. Observational analyses were excluded. No trials were excluded based on sample size or follow-up duration.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted independently and in triplicate. Clinical end points were pooled in meta-analyses that applied fixed-effects and random-effects modeling to calculate summary estimates for relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios, along with their corresponding 95% CIs.

Main outcomes and measures: The prespecified primary end point was all-cause death. Secondary end points included recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeated coronary revascularization, major bleeding, cardiovascular death, death or MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, major adverse cardiac events, major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, and length of hospital stay.

Results: The sample size-weighted mean age of participants across included trials was 82.6 years, and 46% were female. In the pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in all-cause death between the invasive and conservative strategies (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.11; P = .15; I2 = 0%). An early invasive strategy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent MI of 22% (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; P = .001; I2 = 0%) and repeated coronary revascularization during follow-up of 57% (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60; P < .001; I2 = 33.3%). However, an invasive strategy was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.53; P = .05; I2 = 16.7). No differences were observed in secondary end points. Results in the non-ST-elevation ACS population were consistent with the overall findings.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that, in older patients with ACS, an early invasive strategy was not associated with reduced all-cause death compared with conservative management. An early invasive strategy was associated with reduced recurrent MI and repeated coronary revascularization during follow-up but increased risk of major bleeding. Competing risks associated with an early invasive strategy should be weighed in shared therapeutic decision-making for older patients with ACS.

Author/s:

Rohin K Reddy, David Koeckerling, Christian Eichhorn, Yasser Jamil, Maddalena Ardissino, Volker Braun, Haitham Abu Sharar, Norbert Frey, James P Howard, Yousif Ahmad

What Is Atrial Fibrillation?

Erin Blanchette — Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:32:57 +0000

Date Added:

April 30, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

April 24, 2025

URL:

Type:

Patient Education Materials

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.2888

Keywords

atrial fibrillation

Cardiology

Patient Information

jama Patient Information

Rhythm Disorders

PMID (1):

40272794

MeSH

hypertension

Sodium restrictions in heart failure

sleep apnea syndromes

Information for patients about atrial fibrillation. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Atrial fibrillation is an abnormal heart rhythm that can cause stroke, heart failure, heart attack, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and death.

Atrial fibrillation is classified as paroxysmal (intermittent episodes lasting 7 days or less), persistent (lasting more than 7 days), long-standing persistent (lasting more than 1 year), or permanent.1

In the US, atrial fibrillation affects about 10.55 million people and is more common among men than women. Other risk factors include older age, smoking, high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, high alcohol consumption, sleep apnea, an overactive thyroid gland, and possibly genetic factors.

Author/s:

Rebecca Voelker

Sodium restrictions in heart failure

Alex Haga — Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:24:48 +0000

Date Added:

January 27, 2025

Journal/Publication:

Canadian Family Physician

Publication Date:

January 1, 2025

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

URL:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.46747/cfp.710141

Keywords

Sodium

dietary

chronic heart failure

PMID (1):

39843182

MeSH

Sodium

Dietary

Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Dietary sodium intake of less than 2 gm per day is no better than 2 - 3 gm per day for reducing hospitalizations or death. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Clinical question
Does sodium restriction improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF)?

Bottom line
In patients with CHF, restricting dietary sodium to less than 2 g/day does not reduce death or hospitalization compared with 2 to 3 g/day.

Author/s:

Ricky D Turgeon, James P McCormack, Jen Potter

Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Erin Blanchette — Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:34:46 +0000

Date Added:

November 18, 2024

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

November 14, 2024

URL:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2024.19565

Keywords

atrial fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation* / diagnosis

PMID (1):

39541112

MeSH

atrial fibrillation

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Mitral Valve Stenosis

Atrial Appendage

Aortic valve replacement versus conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial

2023 guidelines from the ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS on treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Atrial fibrillation has a lifetime prevalence of 15% to 40% and predisposes patients to stroke and cardiac dysfunction. This JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis focuses on recommendations for long-term management of AF, including new paradigms for rhythm control and stroke risk reduction.

Author/s:

Francis J Alenghat, Jason T Alexander, Gaurav A Upadhyay

Aortic valve replacement versus conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial

Alex Haga — Tue, 08 Oct 2024 17:36:11 +0000

Date Added:

October 8, 2024

Journal/Publication:

European Heart Journal

Publication Date:

September 1, 2024

URL:

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1093/eurheartj/ehae585

Keywords

PMID (1):

39217448

MeSH

Aortic Valve

Stroke Volume

Kaplan-Meier Estimate

Avatar

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Milestones in Heart Failure: How Far We Have Come and How Far We Have Left to Go

Contrary to prior recommendations, it looks like surgical repair of severely stenotic aortic valves produces better results when done early. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background and aims: The question of when and how to treat truly asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function is still subject to debate and ongoing research. Here, the results of extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial are reported (NCT02436655, clinical trials.gov).

Methods: The AVATAR trial randomly assigned patients with severe, asymptomatic AS and LV ejection fraction ≥50% to undergo either early surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or conservative treatment with watchful waiting strategy. All patients had negative exercise stress testing. The primary hypothesis was that early AVR will reduce a primary composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure (HF), as compared to conservative treatment strategy.

Results: A total of 157 low-risk patients (mean age 67 years, 57% men, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 1.7%) were randomly allocated to either early AVR group (n=78) or conservative treatment group (n=79). In an intention-to-treat analysis, after a median follow-up of 63 months, the primary composite endpoint outcome event occurred in 18/78 patients (23.1%) in the early surgery group and in 37/79 patients (46.8%) in the conservative treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] early surgery vs. conservative treatment 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.73, p=0.002). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for individual endpoints of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were significantly lower in the early surgery compared with the conservative group (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.85, p=0.012 for all-cause death, and HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06-0.73, p=0.007 for HF hospitalizations).

Conclusions: The extended follow-up of the AVATAR trial demonstrates better clinical outcomes with early surgical AVR in truly asymptomatic patients with severe AS and normal LV ejection fraction compared with patients treated with conservative management on watchful waiting.

Author/s:

Marko Banovic, Svetozar Putnik, Bruno R Da Costa, Martin Penicka, Marek A Deja, Martin Kotrc

Milestones in Heart Failure: How Far We Have Come and How Far We Have Left to Go

Saige Blanchard — Mon, 03 Jan 2022 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 3, 2022

Journal/Publication:

Cureus Journal of Medical Science

Publication Date:

December 12, 2021

URL:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.7759/cureus.20359

Keywords

MeSH

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control

Disease Progression

A nice summary of what we currently know about the pharmacologic treatment of congestive heart failure. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Heart failure is a clinically complex syndrome that results due to the failure of the ventricles to function as pump and oxygenate end organs. The repercussions of inadequate perfusion are seen in the form of sympathetic overactivation and third spacing, leading to clinical signs of increased blood pressure, dyspnea, fatigue, palpitations, etc. This article provided a brief overview of the clinical syndrome of heart failure; its epidemiology, risk factors, symptoms, and staging; and the mechanisms involved in disease progression. This article also described several landmark trials in heart failure that tested the efficacy of first-line drugs such as beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and the latest drugs in the field of heart failure: angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors. Most studies described in this article were guideline-setting trials that revolutionized the practice of medicine and cardiology.

Author/s:

H., Kela, I., Kakarlala, C., Hassan, M., Belavadi, R., Gudigopuram, S. V. R., Raguthu, C., Modi, S., Sange, I.

Malnutrition in hospitalized adults: A systematic review

Bethie Seay — Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

October 14, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publication Date:

October 13, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

EHC035

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

10.23970/AHRQEPCCER249

A summary of what we know about the impact and management of malnutrition in hospitalized patients.

View

Objectives. To review the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients, evaluate effectiveness of measurement tools for malnutrition on clinical outcomes, and assess effectiveness of hospital-initiated interventions for patients diagnosed with malnutrition.

Data sources. We searched electronic databases (Embase®, MEDLINE®, PubMed®, and the Cochrane Library) from January 1, 2000, to June 3, 2021. We hand-searched reference lists of relevant studies and searched for unpublished studies in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Review methods. Using predefined criteria and dual review, we selected (1) existing systematic reviews (SRs) to assess the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes, (2) randomized and non-randomized studies to evaluate the effectiveness of malnutrition tools on clinical outcomes, and (3) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess effectiveness of hospital-initiated treatments for malnutrition. Clinical outcomes of interest included mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission, quality of life, functional status, activities of daily living, hospital acquired conditions, wound healing, and discharge disposition. When appropriate, we conducted meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize study findings; otherwise, data were narratively synthesized. When available, we used pooled estimates from existing SRs to determine the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes, and assessed the strength of evidence.

Results. Six existing SRs (including 43 unique studies) provided evidence on the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes. Low to moderate strength of evidence (SOE) showed an association between malnutrition and increased hospital mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay. This association was observed across patients hospitalized for an acute medical event requiring intensive care unit care, heart failure, and cirrhosis. Literature searches found no studies that met inclusion criteria and assessed effectiveness of measurement tools. The primary reason studies did not meet inclusion criteria is because they lacked an appropriate control group. Moderate SOE from 11 RCTs found that hospital-initiated malnutrition interventions likely reduce mortality compared with usual care among hospitalized patients diagnosed with malnutrition. Low SOE indicated that hospital-initiated malnutrition interventions may also improve quality of life compared to usual care.

Conclusions. Evidence shows an association between malnutrition and increased mortality and prolonged length of hospital stay among hospitalized patients identified as malnourished. However, the strength of this association varied depending on patient population and tool used to identify malnutrition. Evidence indicates malnutrition-focused hospital-initiated interventions likely reduce mortality and may improve quality of life compared to usual care among patients diagnosed with malnutrition. Research is needed to assess the clinical utility of measurement tools for malnutrition.

Author/s:

Uhl, S., Siddique, S. M., McKeever, L., Bloschichak, A., D'Anci, K., Leas, B., Mull, N. K, Tsou, A. Y.

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control

Saige Blanchard — Fri, 21 May 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

May 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

New England Journal of Medicine

Publisher:

Massachusetts Medical Society

Publication Date:

May 20, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

384

Pages:

1921-1930

URL:

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1056/NEJMoa1901281

Keywords

PMID (1):

34010531

MeSH

blood-pressure

cardiovascular diseases

acute coronary syndrome

hypotension

Estimating Lifetime Benefits of Comprehensive Disease-Modifying Pharmacological Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Comparative Analysis of Three Randomised Controlled Trials

In patients at high risk for cardiovascular events, intensive BP control (target <120 systolic) reduced the rate of adverse CV events (CAD events, CVA, CHF, or death) by 0.63% per year. Serious adverse events of hypotension, electrolyte abnormalities, acute kidney injury or failure, and syncope were significantly more frequent in the intensive-treatment group. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Background: In a previously reported randomized trial of standard and intensive systolic blood-pressure control, data on some outcome events had yet to be adjudicated and post-trial follow-up data had not yet been collected.

Methods: We randomly assigned 9361 participants who were at increased risk for cardiovascular disease but did not have diabetes or previous stroke to adhere to an intensive treatment target (systolic blood pressure, <120 mm Hg) or a standard treatment target (systolic blood pressure, <140 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Additional primary outcome events occurring through the end of the intervention period (August 20, 2015) were adjudicated after data lock for the primary analysis. We also analyzed post-trial observational follow-up data through July 29, 2016.

Results: At a median of 3.33 years of follow-up, the rate of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality during the trial were significantly lower in the intensive-treatment group than in the standard-treatment group (rate of the primary outcome, 1.77% per year vs. 2.40% per year; hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.86; all-cause mortality, 1.06% per year vs. 1.41% per year; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92). Serious adverse events of hypotension, electrolyte abnormalities, acute kidney injury or failure, and syncope were significantly more frequent in the intensive-treatment group. When trial and post-trial follow-up data were combined (3.88 years in total), similar patterns were found for treatment benefit and adverse events; however, rates of heart failure no longer differed between the groups.

Conclusions: Among patients who were at increased cardiovascular risk, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg resulted in lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and lower all-cause mortality than targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg, both during receipt of the randomly assigned therapy and after the trial. Rates of some adverse events were higher in the intensive-treatment group. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062.).

Author/s:

Lewis, C. E., Fine, L. J., Beddhu, S., Cheung, A. K., Cushman, W. C., Cutler, J. A., Evans, G. W., Johnson, K. C., Kitzman, D. W., Oparil, S., Rahman, M., Reboussin, D. M., Rocco, M. V., Sink, K, M., Snyder, J. K., Whelton, P. K., Williamson, J. D., Wright Jr., J. T., Ambrosius, W. T.

Estimating Lifetime Benefits of Comprehensive Disease-Modifying Pharmacological Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Comparative Analysis of Three Randomised Controlled Trials

John Bayhi — Tue, 26 May 2020 20:29:33 +0000

Date Added:

May 26, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Lancet

Publisher:

Elsevier Ltd

Publication Date:

May 21, 2020

Volume:

Online ahead of print

URL:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30748-0

Keywords

CHF patients

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

pharmacologic management

PMID (1):

32446323

MeSH

Humans

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Neprilysin

sodium-glucose transporter 2

SLC5A2 protein, human

Stroke Volume

Control Groups

Receptors, Drug

Progression-Free Survival

Receptors, Angiotensin

NR3C2 protein, human

For those of you who still initiate and manage CHF with reduced LV ejection fraction, this meta-analysis appears to support using combinations of the following five agents: 1) an ACEI or ARB, 2) a beta-blocker, 3) a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], 4) an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI], and 5) a sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitor. They estimate that combined therapy could increase life expectancy for an 80-year-old 1.4 years and for a 55-year-old 6.3 years. If we are going to continue to manage these patients, it looks like we are going to have to develop specific CHF visits and protocols like those used in CHF clinics run by cardiology teams. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Background: Three drug classes (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs], angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors [ARNIs], and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitors) reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) beyond conventional therapy consisting of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and β blockers. Each class was previously studied with different background therapies and the expected treatment benefits with their combined use are not known. Here, we used data from three previously reported randomised controlled trials to estimate lifetime gains in event-free survival and overall survival with comprehensive therapy versus conventional therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF.

Methods: In this cross-trial analysis, we estimated treatment effects of comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy (ARNI, β blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor) versus conventional therapy (ACE inhibitor or ARB and β blocker) in patients with chronic HFrEF by making indirect comparisons of three pivotal trials, EMPHASIS-HF (n=2737), PARADIGM-HF (n=8399), and DAPA-HF (n=4744). Our primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or first hospital admission for heart failure; we also assessed these endpoints individually and assessed all-cause mortality. Assuming these relative treatment effects are consistent over time, we then projected incremental long-term gains in event-free survival and overall survival with comprehensive disease-modifying therapy in the control group of the EMPHASIS-HF trial (ACE inhibitor or ARB and β blocker).

Findings: The hazard ratio (HR) for the imputed aggregate treatment effects of comprehensive disease-modifying therapy versus conventional therapy on the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for heart failure was 0·38 (95% CI 0·30-0·47). HRs were also favourable for cardiovascular death alone (HR 0·50 [95% CI 0·37-0·67]), hospital admission for heart failure alone (0·32 [0·24-0·43]), and all-cause mortality (0·53 [0·40-0·70]). Treatment with comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy was estimated to afford 2·7 additional years (for an 80-year-old) to 8·3 additional years (for a 55-year-old) free from cardiovascular death or first hospital admission for heart failure and 1·4 additional years (for an 80-year-old) to 6·3 additional years (for a 55-year-old) of survival compared with conventional therapy.

Interpretation: Among patients with HFrEF, the anticipated aggregate treatment effects of early comprehensive disease-modifying pharmacological therapy are substantial and support the combination use of an ARNI, β blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor as a new therapeutic standard.

Funding: None.

Author/s:

Vaduganathan, M., Claggett, BL, Jhund, PS, Cunningham, JW, Ferreira, JP, Zannad, F, Packer, M, Fonarow, GC, McMurray, JJV, Solomon, S.D.

Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease

John Bayhi — Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:30:58 +0000

Date Added:

April 2, 2020

Journal/Publication:

The New England Journal of Medicine

Publisher:

Massachusetts Medical Society

Publication Date:

March 30, 2020

Issue:

Online ahead of print

URL:

Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1056/nejmoa1915922

Keywords

cardiac ischemia

cardiac interventions

PMID (1):

32227755

MeSH