osteoarthritis

Arthritis is a leading cause of pain and disability that affects nearly one-third of older US adults (age ≥65 years). While osteoarthritis (OA) predominates, many have inflammatory arthritis (IA), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis, and crystal arthropathies.1 Recognition of IA is frequently delayed for longer than a year in older adults due to atypical and overlapping presentations.2 Untreated IA can lead to irreversible damage, functional decline, and prolonged glucocorticoid exposure. Joint pain is often initially evaluated by primary care clinicians; therefore, timely recognition and early management are essential. This article highlights unique aspects of IA in older adults and offers practical guidance.

Author/s:

Jiha Lee, Justin B Levinson, Una E Makris

Online Unsupervised Tai Chi Intervention for Knee Pain and Function in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: The RETREAT Randomized Clinical Trial

Megan George — Tue, 06 Jan 2026 14:16:13 +0000

Date Added:

January 6, 2026

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Internal Medicine

Publication Date:

October 27, 2025

URL:

Online Unsupervised Tai Chi Intervention for Knee Pain and Function in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: The RETREAT Randomized Clinical Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5723

Keywords

PMID (1):

41143827

MeSH

aged

Arthralgia* / etiology

Arthralgia* / therapy

Knee* / physiopathology

Middle Aged

Knee* / therapy

Pain Management* / methods

Tai Ji* / methods

A free online Tai Chi app improved comfort and function in patients with OA of the knees. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Importance Tai chi is a type of exercise recommended for knee osteoarthritis, but access to in-person tai chi can be limited.

Objective To evaluate the effects of an unsupervised multimodal online tai chi intervention on knee pain and function for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Design, Setting, and Participants The RETREAT study was a 2-group superiority randomized clinical trial enrolling participants who met clinical criteria for knee osteoarthritis in Australian communities from August 2023 and November 2024.

Interventions Participants in the control group received access to a purpose-built website containing information about osteoarthritis and exercise benefits. Participants in the intervention group received the My Joint Tai Chi intervention comprising access to the same website plus tai chi information, a 12-week unsupervised video-based Yang-style tai chi program, and encouragement to use an app to facilitate program adherence.

Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in knee pain during walking (Numeric Rating Scale; range 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain) and difficulty with physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; range 0-68 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction) during 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included another knee pain measure, sport and recreation function, quality of life, physical and mental well-being, fear of movement, self-efficacy, balance confidence, positive activated affect, sleep quality, global improvement, and oral medication use.

Results Of 2106 patients screened, 178 met inclusion criteria and were randomized, 89 (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [8.7] years; 66 female [74%] and 23 [26%] male participants) to the control group and 89 (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [7.3] years; 59 [66%] female and 30 male [34%] participants) to the tai chi intervention. Of the total, 170 (96%) completed both of the primary outcomes at 12 weeks. The tai chi group reported greater improvements in knee pain (control, −1.3; tai chi, −2.7; mean difference, −1.4 [95% CI, −2.1 to −0.7] units; P < .001) and function (control, −6.9; tai chi, −12.0; mean difference, −5.6 [95% CI, −9.0 to −2.3] units; P < .001) compared to the control group. More participants in the tai chi than in the control group achieved a minimal clinically important difference in pain (73% vs 47%; risk difference, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4; P < .001) and function (72% vs 52%; risk difference, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3; P = .007). Between-group differences for most secondary outcomes favored tai chi, including another knee pain measure, sport and recreation function, quality of life, physical and mental well-being, global improvement, pain self-efficacy, and balance confidence. No associated serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that this unsupervised multimodal online tai chi intervention improved knee pain and function compared with the control at 12 weeks. This free-to-access web-based intervention offers an effective, safe, accessible, and scalable option for guideline-recommended osteoarthritis exercise.

Author/s:

Shiyi Julia Zhu, Rana S. Hinman, Rachel K. Nelligan

The effectiveness and safety of methotrexate in the intervention of osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Megan George — Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:08:01 +0000

Date Added:

October 14, 2025

Journal/Publication:

Medicine

Publication Date:

October 10, 2025

URL:

The effectiveness and safety of methotrexate in the intervention of osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1097/MD.0000000000044994

Keywords

MeSH

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that methotrexate is both safe and effective for treatment of pain and joint stiffness in patients with osteoarthritis. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background:
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic joint disorder among middle-aged and older adults, characterized by progressive cartilage degeneration, subchondral bone remodeling, and osteophyte formation, leading to joint pain, stiffness, dysfunction, and reduced quality of life. With the global aging population, OA imposes a growing socioeconomic burden, yet no disease-modifying therapy is currently available—particularly for moderate-to-severe stages. Emerging evidence implicates synovial inflammation as a central contributor to OA symptoms and progression, raising interest in methotrexate (MTX), a well-established, low-dose anti-inflammatory agent used safely in rheumatoid arthritis. Preliminary studies suggest MTX may alleviate OA-related pain, but findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been inconsistent and limited in number. Given recent new RCTs and the heterogeneity of existing outcomes, an updated systematic review and meta-analysis is urgently needed to clarify the efficacy and safety of MTX in OA and inform future clinical trial design.

Methods:
PubMed, ClinicalTrials, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and other databases were searched to find randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MTX treatment of OA. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane "risk of bias" assessment tool, and the meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK).

Results:
Fifteen RCTs involving 1591 participants were included in this review. The meta-analysis results showed that the ineffective rate in the experimental group was lower [RR: 0.40 (0.24, 0.67), P = .004]; the VAS in the experimental group was lower [WMD: −0.66 (−1.08, −0.24), P = .002]; the WOMAC score-stiffness in the experimental group was lower [WMD: −0.72 (−1.04, −0.41), P < .00001]; the WOMAC score-function in the experimental group was lower [WMD: −7.72 (−13.56, −1.87), P = .01]. The adverse events in the experimental group were not statistically significant compared with the control group [RR: 1.04 (0.77, 1.42), P = .78].

Conclusion:
MTX demonstrates potential in effectively alleviating pain, improving joint function, and slowing disease progression in patients with OA. Its safety profile is comparable to that of control treatments, making it a viable and reliable therapeutic option worthy of broader clinical application.

Author/s:

Wan, Lifei, Yang, Qianyue, Yang, Kailin, Zeng, Liuting, Sun, Lingyun

Evaluation and Treatment of Knee Pain: A Review

Erin Blanchette — Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:54:15 +0000

Date Added:

November 14, 2023

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

October 24, 2023

Issue:

Volume:

330

Pages:

1568–1580

URL:

Evaluation and Treatment of Knee Pain: A Review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2023.19675

Keywords

Arthralgia

Knee Joint

Knee pain

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Knee osteoarthritis

osteoarthritis

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Tibial Meniscus Injuries

meniscal tear

PMID (1):

37874571

MeSH

Arthralgia* / diagnosis

Knee Joint*

Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods

osteoarthritis

Knee / diagnosis

Tibial Meniscus Injuries / complications

A review of the diagnosis and management of patients with knee pain. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Importance: Approximately 5% of all primary care visits in adults are related to knee pain. Osteoarthritis (OA), patellofemoral pain, and meniscal tears are among the most common causes of knee pain.

Observations: Knee OA, affecting an estimated 654 million people worldwide, is the most likely diagnosis of knee pain in patients aged 45 years or older who present with activity-related knee joint pain with no or less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness (95% sensitivity; 69% specificity). Patellofemoral pain typically affects people younger than 40 years who are physically active and has a lifetime prevalence of approximately 25%. The presence of anterior knee pain during a squat is approximately 91% sensitive and 50% specific for patellofemoral pain. Meniscal tears affect an estimated 12% of the adult population and can occur following acute trauma (eg, twisting injury) in people younger than 40 years. Alternatively, a meniscal tear may be a degenerative condition present in patients with knee OA who are aged 40 years or older. The McMurray test, consisting of concurrent knee rotation (internal or external to test lateral or medial meniscus, respectively) and extension (61% sensitivity; 84% specificity), and joint line tenderness (83% sensitivity; 83% specificity) assist diagnosis of meniscal tears. Radiographic imaging of all patients with possible knee OA is not recommended. First-line management of OA comprises exercise therapy, weight loss (if overweight), education, and self-management programs to empower patients to better manage their condition. Surgical referral for knee joint replacement can be considered for patients with end-stage OA (ie, no or minimal joint space with inability to cope with pain) after using all appropriate conservative options. For patellofemoral pain, hip and knee strengthening exercises in combination with foot orthoses or patellar taping are recommended, with no indication for surgery. Conservative management (exercise therapy for 4-6 weeks) is also appropriate for most meniscal tears. For severe traumatic (eg, bucket-handle) tears, consisting of displaced meniscal tissue, surgery is likely required. For degenerative meniscal tears, exercise therapy is first-line treatment; surgery is not indicated even in the presence of mechanical symptoms (eg, locking, catching).

Conclusions and Relevance: Knee OA, patellofemoral pain, and meniscal tears are common causes of knee pain, can be diagnosed clinically, and can be associated with significant disability. First-line treatment for each condition consists of conservative management, with a focus on exercise, education, and self-management.

Author/s:

Win Min Oo, Changhai Ding, Adam G. Culvenor, David J. Hunter

Clin-STAR corner: 2021 update in musculoskeletal pain in older adults with a focus on osteoarthritis-related pain

Rowan Hutchins — Sun, 17 Sep 2023 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

September 17, 2023

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Publisher:

American Geriatrics Society

Publication Date:

April 25, 2023

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

2373-2380

URL:

Clin-STAR corner: 2021 update in musculoskeletal pain in older adults with a focus on osteoarthritis-related pain

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18369

Keywords

PMID (1):

37186060

MeSH

Musculoskeletal Pain* / drug therapy

osteoarthritis

Knee* / complications

Knee* / therapy

A summary of what we know about managing chronic musculoskeletal pain in older people. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain remains a leading cause of disability and functional impairment among older adults and is associated with substantial societal and personal costs. Chronic pain is particularly challenging to manage in older adults because of multimorbidity, concerns about treatment-related harm, as well as older adults' beliefs about pain and its management. This narrative review presents data on nine high-quality, peer-reviewed clinical trials published primarily over the past two years that focus on MSK pain management in older adults, of which four were comprehensively reviewed. These studies address contributors to knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain (insomnia), provide evidence for digital delivery or artificial intelligence driven behavioral interventions and potentially more efficient/equally effective modes of delivering glucocorticoids for OA; each of the selected studies have potential for scalability and meaningful impact in the care of older adults.

Author/s:

Owoicho Adogwa, M. Cary Reid, Sai Chilakapati, Una E. Makris

Effect of Telephone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Older Adults With Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Devin Evans — Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

February 24, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine

Publication Date:

February 22, 2021

URL:

Effect of Telephone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Older Adults With Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.9049

Keywords

Telephone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

PMID (1):

33616613

MeSH

aged

sleep initiation and maintenance disorders

Sleep Hygiene

osteoarthritis

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Telephone

Cognitive behavioral therapy is apparently the most effective way to help people sleep better, even if provided virtually. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Scalable delivery models of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), an effective treatment, are needed for widespread implementation, particularly in rural and underserved populations lacking ready access to insomnia treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone CBT-I vs education-only control (EOC) in older adults with moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain.

Design, setting, and participants: This is a randomized clinical trial of 327 participants 60 years and older who were recruited statewide through Kaiser Permanente Washington from September 2016 to December 2018. Participants were double screened 3 weeks apart for moderate to severe insomnia and osteoarthritis (OA) pain symptoms. Blinded assessments were conducted at baseline, after 2 months posttreatment, and at 12-month follow-up.

Interventions: Six 20- to 30-minute telephone sessions provided over 8 weeks. Participants submitted daily diaries and received group-specific educational materials. The CBT-I instruction included sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene, cognitive restructuring, and homework. The EOC group received information about sleep and OA.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was score on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at 2 months posttreatment and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included pain (score on the Brief Pain Inventory-short form), depression (score on the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire), and fatigue (score on the Flinders Fatigue Scale).

Results: Of the 327 participants, the mean (SD) age was 70.2 (6.8) years, and 244 (74.6%) were women. In the 282 participants with follow-up ISI data, the total 2-month posttreatment ISI scores decreased 8.1 points in the CBT-I group and 4.8 points in the EOC group, an adjusted mean between-group difference of -3.5 points (95% CI, -4.4 to -2.6 points; P < .001). Results were sustained at 12-month follow-up (adjusted mean difference, -3.0 points; 95% CI, -4.1 to -2.0 points; P < .001). At 12-month follow-up, 67 of 119 (56.3%) participants receiving CBT-I remained in remission (ISI score, ≤7) compared with 33 of 128 (25.8%) participants receiving EOC. Fatigue was also significantly reduced in the CBT-I group compared with the EOC group at 2 months posttreatment (mean between-group difference, -2.0 points; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.9 points; P = <.001) and 12-month follow-up (mean between-group difference, -1.8 points; 95% CI, -3.1 to -0.6 points; P = .003). Posttreatment significant differences were observed for pain, but these differences were not sustained at 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, telephone CBT-I was effective in improving sleep, fatigue, and, to a lesser degree, pain among older adults with comorbid insomnia and OA pain in a large statewide health plan. Results support provision of telephone CBT-I as an accessible, individualized, effective, and scalable insomnia treatment.

Author/s:

McCurry, Susan M., Zhu, Weiwei, Von Korff, Michael, Wellman, Robert, Morin, Charles M., Thakral, Manu, Yeung, Kai, Vitiello, Michael V.

Stepped Exercise Program for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Devin Evans — Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 14, 2021

Journal/Publication:

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder

Publication Date:

May 28, 2019

Issue:

254

Volume:

URL:

Stepped Exercise Program for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12891-019-2627-8

Keywords

PMID (1):

31138256

MeSH

Physical Therapy Modalities

Patient-Centered Care

exercise therapy

An interesting type of stepped intervention that could be applied to other health conditions as well. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Physical therapy (PT) and other exercise-based interventions are core components of care for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but both are underutilized, and some patients have limited access to PT services. This clinical trial is examining a STepped Exercise Program for patients with Knee OsteoArthritis (STEP-KOA). This model of care can help to tailor exercise-based interventions to patient needs and also conserve higher resource services (such as PT) for patients who do not make clinically relevant improvements after receiving less costly interventions.

Methods / design: Step-KOA is a randomized trial of 345 patients with symptomatic knee OA from two Department of Veterans Affairs sites. Participants are randomized to STEP-KOA and Arthritis Education (AE) Control groups with a 2:1 ratio, respectively. STEP-KOA begins with 3 months of access to an internet-based exercise program (Step 1). Participants not meeting response criteria for clinically meaningful improvement in pain and function after Step 1 progress to Step 2, which involves bi-weekly physical activity coaching calls for 3 months. Participants not meeting response criteria after Step 2 progress to in-person PT visits (Step 3). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months (primary outcome time point). The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and secondary outcomes are objective measures of physical function. Linear mixed models will compare outcomes between the STEP-KOA and AE control groups at follow-up. We will also evaluate patient characteristics associated with treatment response and conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of STEP-KOA.

Discussion: STEP-KOA is a novel, efficient and patient-centered approach to delivering exercise-based interventions to patients with knee OA, one of the most prevalent and disabling health conditions. This trial will provide information on the effectiveness of STEP-KOA as a novel potential model of care for treatment of OA.

Author/s:

Allen, Kelli D., Bongiorni, Dennis, Caves, Kevin, Coffman, Cynthia J., Floegel, Theresa A., Greysen, Heather M., Hall, Katherine S., Heiderscheit, Bryan, Hoenig, Helen M., Huffman, Kim M., Morey, Miriam D., Ramasunder, Shalini, Severson, Herbert, Smith, Battista, Van Houtven, Courtney, Woolson, Sandra

Glucosamine/Chondroitin and Mortality in a US NHANES Cohort

Devin Evans — Mon, 21 Dec 2020 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

December 21, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Publication Date:

December 3, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

842-847

URL:

Glucosamine/Chondroitin and Mortality in a US NHANES Cohort

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.200110

Keywords

Chondroitin

Cardiovascular Diseases

Proportional Hazards Models

PMID (1):

33219063

MeSH

Proportional Hazards Models

cohort studies

Cardiovascular System

Chondroitin

Glucosamine

A large, well-deigned cohort study confirming two prior studies showing that regular intake of glucosamine/chondroitin is associated with reduced cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. It doesn’t prove causation, but they were able to control for a number of potential confounders and co-variates. It would be helpful to have a potential mechanism. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Limited previous studies in the United Kingdom or a single US state have demonstrated an association between intake of glucosamine/chondroitin and mortality. This study sought to investigate the association between regular consumption of glucosamine/chondroitin and overall and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality in a national sample of US adults.

Methods: Combined data from 16,686 participants in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999 to 2010, merged with the 2015 Public-use Linked Mortality File. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted for both CVD and all-cause mortality.

Results: In the study sample, there were 658 (3.94%) participants who had been taking glucosamine/chondroitin for a year or longer. During followup (median, 107 months), there were 3366 total deaths (20.17%); 674 (20.02%) were due to CVD. Respondents taking glucosamine/chondroitin were less likely to have CVD mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92). After controlling for age, use was associated with a 39% reduction in all-cause (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.77) and 65% reduction (HR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20-0.61) in CVD mortality. Multivariable-adjusted HR showed that the association was maintained after adjustment for age, sex, race, education, smoking status, and physical activity (all-cause mortality, HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.93; CVD mortality, HR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75).

Conclusions: Regular intake of glucosamine/chondroitin is associated with lower all-cause and CVD mortality in a national US cohort and the findings are consistent with previous studies in other populations. Prospective studies to confirm the link may be warranted.

Author/s:

King, Dana E., Xiang, Jun

The effect of curcumin ointment on knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo trial

Brian Desmarais — Mon, 09 Nov 2020 21:58:59 +0000

Date Added:

November 9, 2020

Journal/Publication:

BMC Complimentary medicine and therapies

Publication Date:

October 1, 2020

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

305

URL:

The effect of curcumin ointment on knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12906-020-03105-0

Keywords

In this short-term (6-week) involving 72 older adults with knee pain due to OA, curcumin 5% ointment applied twice daily provided significantly more pain relief than a placebo ointment (Vaseline). James W. Mold, MD, MP

Free full text

View

Abstract

Background: Some studies have shown the effect of oral administration of curcumin on knee pain. However, limited studies are available on the effect of topical curcumin. This study aimed to investigate the effect of curcumin ointment on knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis.

Methods: This double-blind randomized placebo trial was conducted on 72 older adults with knee pain associated with osteoarthritis. The subjects were randomly assigned into an intervention and a placebo group to apply either curcumin 5% ointment or Vaseline ointment twice daily for 6 weeks. Using a Visual Analog Scale, the severity of knee pain was measured at the beginning of the study, at the end of the fourth and sixth week. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential methods.

Results: The mean baseline knee pain intensity was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.15). The mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the placebo group at the third measurement (P = 0.02). The repeated-measures analysis showed that over time, the curcumin significantly decreased the mean pain intensity in the intervention group (P = 0.001). The mixed model showed an absolute difference of 1.133 (i.e. 11.33 mm) score which signifies a medium effect size and that the patient in the intervention group achieved the minimal clinically important difference.

Conclusion: Topical administration of curcumin 5% ointment can significantly reduce knee pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Curcumin ointment can be used as an alternative treatment in older adults with knee pain associated with osteoarthritis.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20100403003618N6, 2019-03-08), https://en.irct.ir/trial/37155.

Author/s:

Jamali, N., Adib-Hajbaghery, M., Soleimani, A.

Physical Therapy Versus Glucocorticoid Injection for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

John Bayhi — Thu, 09 Apr 2020 15:03:49 +0000

Date Added:

April 9, 2020

Journal/Publication:

New England Journal of Medicine

Publisher:

Massachusetts Medical Society

Publication Date:

April 9, 2020

Issue:

382

Pages:

1420-1429

URL:

Physical Therapy Versus Glucocorticoid Injection for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1056/NEJMoa1905877

Keywords

PMID (1):

32268027

MeSH

Military Health Services

Time and Motion Studies

Physical therapy produces better outcomes at one year than corticosteroid injections in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Background: Both physical therapy and intraarticular injections of glucocorticoids have been shown to confer clinical benefit with respect to osteoarthritis of the knee. Whether the short-term and long-term effectiveness for relieving pain and improving physical function differ between these two therapies is uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a randomized trial to compare physical therapy with glucocorticoid injection in the primary care setting in the U.S. Military Health System. Patients with osteoarthritis in one or both knees were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a glucocorticoid injection or to undergo physical therapy. The primary outcome was the total score on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 1 year (scores range from 0 to 240, with higher scores indicating worse pain, function, and stiffness). The secondary outcomes were the time needed to complete the Alternate Step Test, the time needed to complete the Timed Up and Go test, and the score on the Global Rating of Change scale, all assessed at 1 year.

Results: We enrolled 156 patients with a mean age of 56 years; 78 patients were assigned to each group. Baseline characteristics, including severity of pain and level of disability, were similar in the two groups. The mean (±SD) baseline WOMAC scores were 108.8±47.1 in the glucocorticoid injection group and 107.1±42.4 in the physical therapy group. At 1 year, the mean scores were 55.8±53.8 and 37.0±30.7, respectively (mean between-group difference, 18.8 points; 95% confidence interval, 5.0 to 32.6), a finding favoring physical therapy. Changes in secondary outcomes were in the same direction as those of the primary outcome. One patient fainted while receiving a glucocorticoid injection.

Conclusions: Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent physical therapy had less pain and functional disability at 1 year than patients who received an intraarticular glucocorticoid injection. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01427153.).

Author/s:

Deyle, GD, Allen, CS, Allison, SC, Gill, NW, Hando, BR, Petersen, EJ, Dusenberry, DI, Rhon, DI

The effects of a home-based exercise intervention on elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: a quasi-experimental study

Jeffrey Wilson — Wed, 01 May 2019 20:18:15 +0000

Date Added:

May 1, 2019

Journal/Publication:

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Publication Date:

April 9, 2019

Issue:

Volume:

URL:

The effects of a home-based exercise intervention on elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: a quasi-experimental study

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12891-019-2521-4

Keywords

osteoarthritis

physical therapy

health education

PMID (1):

30967131

MeSH

In this admittedly imperfect study, older osteoarthritis patients receiving 8 hours of physical therapy, periodic telephone support, and health education had significantly less pain and more function at 3 months than control patients receiving standard care. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

BACKGROUND:

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is common in elderly people, causes pain, loss of physical functioning, and disability. This was a two-arm, superiority, quasi-experimental trial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based exercise intervention (HBEI) to reduce KOA symptoms and improve the physical functioning of elderly patients.

METHODS:

A total of 171 elderly patients (60 years of age or older) with KOA were recruited from four community centers. Patients from two community centers were randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG) and the other two centers were randomly assigned to the control group (CG). Participants in the IG received a 12-week HBEI (including four 2-h sessions supervised by a physiotherapist and fortnightly telephone support) combined with health education, while patients in the CG only received health education. The participants and physiotherapists were aware of the group assignment and alternative treatment components, but the study's hypotheses were not disclosed to the participants. Pain intensity, joint stiffness, lower-limb muscle strength, balance, mobility, and quality of life were measured before and after the intervention by the same blinded assessor.

RESULTS:

A total of 171 patients (IG: n = 84, CG: n = 87) were enrolled. Data were obtained from 141 patients with an average age of 68 (range, 60-86 years) who completed the 12-week study (IG: n = 71, CG: n = 70). No significant group differences were found in any outcome measures at baseline. At week 12, the pretest/posttest changes 3significant between-group differences in decreases in pain intensity (- 1.60 (CI, - 2.75 to - 0.58)) and stiffness (- 0.79 (CI, - 1.37 to - 0.21)), with the IG exhibiting significantly larger improvements on both measures than the CG. The IG also showed significantly greater improvements on all the secondary outcomes than the CG did.

CONCLUSIONS:

HBEI may be effective for relieving KOA symptoms, increasing the physical functioning, and improving quality of life in community-dwelling KOA elderly patients. A large randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Author/s:

Chen, Hongbo, Zheng, Xiaoyan, Huang, Hongjie, Liu, Congying, Wan, Qiaoqin, Shang, Shaomei

Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review

Jeffrey Wilson — Wed, 03 Apr 2019 14:50:52 +0000

Date Added:

April 3, 2019

Journal/Publication:

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Publisher:

Cochrane Library

Publication Date:

April 17, 2018

URL:

Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2

Keywords

exercise therapy

chronic pain

osteoarthritis

PMID (1):

29664187

MeSH

Many patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip believe that physical activity could further damage their joints. Providing reassurance and clear advice about the value of exercise in controlling symptoms, and opportunities to participate in activities that people regard as enjoyable and relevant, may encourage more physical activity, which brings a range of health benefits to a large population of people. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

BACKGROUND:

Chronic peripheral joint pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) is extremely prevalent and a major cause of physical dysfunction and psychosocial distress. Exercise is recommended to reduce joint pain and improve physical function, but the effect of exercise on psychosocial function (health beliefs, depression, anxiety and quality of life) in this population is unknown.

OBJECTIVES:

To improve our understanding of the complex inter-relationship between pain, psychosocial effects, physical function and exercise.

SEARCH METHODS:

Review authors searched 23 clinical, public health, psychology and social care databases and 25 other relevant resources including trials registers up to March 2016. We checked reference lists of included studies for relevant studies. We contacted key experts about unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

To be included in the quantitative synthesis, studies had to be randomised controlled trials of land- or water-based exercise programmes compared with a control group consisting of no treatment or non-exercise intervention (such as medication, patient education) that measured either pain or function and at least one psychosocial outcome (self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, quality of life). Participants had to be aged 45 years or older, with a clinical diagnosis of OA (as defined by the study) or self-reported chronic hip or knee (or both) pain (defined as more than six months' duration).To be included in the qualitative synthesis, studies had to have reported people's opinions and experiences of exercise-based programmes (e.g. their views, understanding, experiences and beliefs about the utility of exercise in the management of chronic pain/OA).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

We used standard methodology recommended by Cochrane for the quantitative analysis. For the qualitative analysis, we extracted verbatim quotes from study participants and synthesised studies of patients' views using framework synthesis. We then conducted an integrative review, synthesising the quantitative and qualitative data together.

MAIN RESULTS:

Twenty-one trials (2372 participants) met the inclusion criteria for quantitative synthesis. There were large variations in the exercise programme's content, mode of delivery, frequency and duration, participant's symptoms, duration of symptoms, outcomes measured, methodological quality and reporting. Comparator groups were varied and included normal care; education; and attention controls such as home visits, sham gel and wait list controls. Risk of bias was high in one and unclear risk in five studies regarding the randomisation process, high for 11 studies regarding allocation concealment, high for all 21 studies regarding blinding, and high for three studies and unclear for five studies regarding attrition. Studies did not provide information on adverse effects.There was moderate quality evidence that exercise reduced pain by an absolute percent reduction of 6% (95% confidence interval (CI) -9% to -4%, (9 studies, 1058 participants), equivalent to reducing (improving) pain by 1.25 points from 6.5 to 5.3 on a 0 to 20 scale and moderate quality evidence that exercise improved physical function by an absolute percent of 5.6% (95% CI -7.6% to 2.0%; standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.17, equivalent to reducing (improving) WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) function on a 0 to 100 scale from 49.9 to 44.3) (13 studies, 1599 participants)). Self-efficacy was increased by an absolute percent of 1.66% (95% CI 1.08% to 2.20%), although evidence was low quality (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58, equivalent to improving the ExBeliefs score on a 17 to 85 scale from 64.3 to 65.4), with small benefits for depression from moderate quality evidence indicating an absolute percent reduction of 2.4% (95% CI -0.47% to 0.5%) (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.02, equivalent to improving depression measured using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) on a 0 to 21 scale from 3.5 to 3.0) but no clinically or statistically significant effect on anxiety (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.05, 2% absolute improvement, 95% CI -5% to 1% equivalent to improving HADS anxiety on a 0 to 21 scale from 5.8 to 5.4; moderate quality evidence). Five studies measured the effect of exercise on health-related quality of life using the 36-item Short Form (SF-36) with statistically significant benefits for social function, increasing it by an absolute percent of 7.9% (95% CI 4.1% to 11.6%), equivalent to increasing SF-36 social function on a 0 to 100 scale from 73.6 to 81.5, although the evidence was low quality. Evidence was downgraded due to heterogeneity of measures, limitations with blinding and lack of detail regarding interventions. For 20/21 studies, there was a high risk of bias with blinding as participants self-reported and were not blinded to their participation in an exercise intervention.Twelve studies (with 6 to 29 participants) met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Their methodological rigour and quality was generally good. From the patients' perspectives, ways to improve the delivery of exercise interventions included: provide better information and advice about the safety and value of exercise; provide exercise tailored to individual's preferences, abilities and needs; challenge inappropriate health beliefs and provide better support.An integrative review, which compared the findings from quantitative trials with low risk of bias and the implications derived from the high-quality studies in the qualitative synthesis, confirmed the importance of these implications.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

Chronic hip and knee pain affects all domains of people's lives. People's beliefs about chronic pain shape their attitudes and behaviours about how to manage their pain. People are confused about the cause of their pain, and bewildered by its variability and randomness. Without adequate information and advice from healthcare professionals, people do not know what they should and should not do, and, as a consequence, avoid activity for fear of causing harm. Participation in exercise programmes may slightly improve physical function, depression and pain. It may slightly improve self-efficacy and social function, although there is probably little or no difference in anxiety. Providing reassurance and clear advice about the value of exercise in controlling symptoms, and opportunities to participate in exercise programmes that people regard as enjoyable and relevant, may encourage greater exercise participation, which brings a range of health benefits to a large population of people.

Author/s:

Hurley, Michael, Dickson, Kelly, Hallett, Rachel, Grant, Robert, Hauari, Hanan, Walsh, Nicola, Stansfield, Claire, Oliver, Sandy

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Jeffrey Wilson — Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:23:50 +0000

Date Added:

January 22, 2019

Journal/Publication:

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Publisher:

American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Publication Date:

December 13, 2018

URL:

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Keywords

MeSH

Platelet rich plasma and hyaluronic acid injections were equally effective for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

View

BACKGROUND::

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been proposed as a new conservative option for knee degeneration to provide symptomatic relief and delay surgical intervention. Although the current literature provides some evidence on the benefits of this technique compared with viscosupplementation, no studies have been performed to compare their long-term effects.

PURPOSE::

To compare the long-term clinical outcomes provided by intra-articular injections of either PRP or hyaluronic acid (HA) to treat knee degenerative disease.

STUDY DESIGN::

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS::

Patients with a history of chronic symptomatic knee degenerative changes and osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-3) were enrolled: 192 patients were randomized to undergo 3 blinded weekly intra-articular injections of either PRP or HA. Patients were prospectively evaluated before the injection and then at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months and a mean of 64.3 months (SD, 7.8 months) of follow-up. Evaluation was based on International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective (main outcome), EuroQol visual analog scale, and Tegner scores; 167 patients reached the final evaluation.

RESULTS::

Both treatments were effective in improving knee functional status and symptoms over time: Mean ± SD IKDC subjective score improved significantly for both PRP and HA groups ( P < .0005) and remained stable over time up to 24 months (from 53.3 ± 14.3 to 67.3 ± 18.1 and from 50.3 ± 13.2 to 62.1 ± 20.8 for PRP and HA groups, respectively). At final evaluation, a significant IKDC reduction was observed in both treatment groups, with the PRP group still presenting significantly higher values compared with baseline: PRP 60.5 ± 19.0 ( P < .001 vs baseline), HA 55.7 ± 18.8 (not significant vs baseline). A comparative analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in any of the clinical scores at any follow-up point. The median duration of patient subjective perception of symptomatic relief was 9 months for HA and 12 months for PRP (not significant). The only significant difference was observed in the rate of reintervention at 24 months, which was significantly lower in the PRP group (22.6% vs 37.1%, P = .036).

CONCLUSION::

Both treatments were effective in improving knee functional status and symptoms over time. PRP did not provide an overall superior clinical improvement compared with HA in terms of either symptomatic-functional improvement at different follow-up points or effect duration.

Author/s:

Di Martino, Alessandro, Di Matteo, Berardo, Papio, Tiziana, Tentoni, Francesco, Selleri, Filippo, Cenacchi, Annarita, Kon, Elizaveta, Filardo, Giuseppe

Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Tracy Ashby — Mon, 07 Jan 2019 06:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

January 21, 2021

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

March 6, 2018

Issue:

Volume:

319

Pages:

872-882

URL:

Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2018.0899

Keywords

PMID (1):

29509867

MeSH

Analgesics

analgesics, opioid

analgesics, non-narcotic

chronic pain

osteoarthritis, knee

In this RCT, comparing non-opioids to opioids for management of chronic pain in the lower back or knee due to OA the researchers found that non-opioid medications were more effective for relieving pain with fewer side effects.

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

Importance Limited evidence is available regarding long-term outcomes of opioids compared with nonopioid medications for chronic pain.

Objective To compare opioid vs nonopioid medications over 12 months on pain-related function, pain intensity, and adverse effects.

Design, Setting, and Participants Pragmatic, 12-month, randomized trial with masked outcome assessment. Patients were recruited from Veterans Affairs primary care clinics from June 2013 through December 2015; follow-up was completed December 2016. Eligible patients had moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain despite analgesic use. Of 265 patients enrolled, 25 withdrew prior to randomization and 240 were randomized.

Interventions Both interventions (opioid and nonopioid medication therapy) followed a treat-to-target strategy aiming for improved pain and function. Each intervention had its own prescribing strategy that included multiple medication options in 3 steps. In the opioid group, the first step was immediate-release morphine, oxycodone, or hydrocodone/acetaminophen. For the nonopioid group, the first step was acetaminophen (paracetamol) or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Medications were changed, added, or adjusted within the assigned treatment group according to individual patient response.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was pain-related function (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] interference scale) over 12 months and the main secondary outcome was pain intensity (BPI severity scale). For both BPI scales (range, 0-10; higher scores = worse function or pain intensity), a 1-point improvement was clinically important. The primary adverse outcome was medication-related symptoms (patient-reported checklist; range, 0-19).

Results Among 240 randomized patients (mean age, 58.3 years; women, 32 [13.0%]), 234 (97.5%) completed the trial. Groups did not significantly differ on pain-related function over 12 months (overall P = .58); mean 12-month BPI interference was 3.4 for the opioid group and 3.3 for the nonopioid group (difference, 0.1 [95% CI, −0.5 to 0.7]). Pain intensity was significantly better in the nonopioid group over 12 months (overall P = .03); mean 12-month BPI severity was 4.0 for the opioid group and 3.5 for the nonopioid group (difference, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.0]). Adverse medication-related symptoms were significantly more common in the opioid group over 12 months (overall P = .03); mean medication-related symptoms at 12 months were 1.8 in the opioid group and 0.9 in the nonopioid group (difference, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 1.5]).

Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with opioids was not superior to treatment with nonopioid medications for improving pain-related function over 12 months. Results do not support initiation of opioid therapy for moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain.

Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01583985

Author/s:

Krebs, Erin E., Gravely, Amy, Nugent, Sean, Jensen, Agnes C., DeRonne, Beth, Goldsmith, Elizabeth S., Kroenke, Kurt, Bair, Matthew J, Noorbaloochi, Siamak