Periprocedural Bridging in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

This systematic review of 28 cohort studies suggests that anticoagulation bridging in patients on warfarin for procedures is probably both unwise (increased bleeding) and unnecessary (no reduction in thromboembolic risk) .

James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the most widely used anticoagulants, and bridging is commonly administered during periprocedural VKA interruption. Given the unclear benefits and risks of periprocedural bridging in patients with previous venousthromboembolism, we aimed to assess recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding outcomes with and without bridging in this population.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 7, 2017 for randomized and nonrandomized studies that included adults with previous venous thromboembolism requiring VKA interruption to undergo an elective procedure, and that reported venous thromboembolism or bleeding outcomes. Quality of evidence was graded by consensus.

RESULTS:

We included 28 cohort studies (20 being single-arm cohorts) with, overall, 6915 procedures for analysis. In 27 studies reporting perioperative venous thromboembolism outcomes, the pooled incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism with bridging was 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4%-1.2%) and 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%) without bridging. Eighteen studies reported major or nonmajor bleeding outcomes. The pooled incidence of any bleeding was 3.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-7.4%) with bridging and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%) without bridging. In bridged patients at high thromboembolic risk, the pooled incidence for venous thromboembolism was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.5%) and 7.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-17.4%) for any bleeding. Quality of available evidence was very low, primarily due to a high risk of bias of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Periprocedural bridging increases the risk of bleeding compared with VKA interruption without bridging, without a significant difference in periprocedural venous thromboembolism rates.

KEYWORDS:

Anticoagulants; Bleeding; Bridging; PROSPERO; Periprocedural; Venous thromboembolism; registration number CRD42017074710

Author/s:

Baumgartner, C., de Kouchkovsky, I., Whitaker, E., Fang, M.C.

Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy With Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding.

Jeffrey Wilson — Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:59:18 +0000

Date Added:

December 21, 2018

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

December 4, 2018

Issue:

Volume:

320

Pages:

2221-2230

URL:

Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy With Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding.

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2018.17242

Keywords

proton pump inhibitor

upper gastrointestinal tract

anticoagulants

atrial fibrillation

PMID (1):

30512099

MeSH

proton pump inhibitors

atrial fibrillation

anticoagulants

upper gastrointestinal tract

This study suggests that Medicare patients on anticoagulants are least likely to be hospitalized for UGI bleeding if they are taking apixaban vs. other anticoagulants, and co-treatment with a PPI reduces the rate by one-third. However, the percentage of patients hospitalized for UGI bleeding was only about 1% so the differences between drugs and between no PPI vs. PPI were small (see table below). Gastroenterologists are likely to begin recommending PPIs for all patients on oral anticoagulants based upon this study. You will have to decide whether or not the potential side effects of PPIs outweigh the very small absolute risk reduction in individual patients.

Anticoagulant

Percent Hospitalized Per Year for UGI Bleeding Not on PPI

Percent hospitalized Per Year for UGI Bleeding On PPI

Warfarin

1.13%

0.73%

Apixaban

0.73%

0.48%

Dabigatran

1.2%

0.59%

Rivaroxaban

1.44%

1.08%

Any of Above

1.15%

0.76%

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

IMPORTANCE:

Anticoagulant choice and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cotherapy could affect the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, a frequent and potentially serious complication of oral anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients using individual anticoagulants with and without PPI cotherapy, and to determine variation according to underlying gastrointestinal bleeding risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

Retrospective cohort study in Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015.

EXPOSURES:

Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin with or without PPI cotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

Hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: adjusted incidence and risk difference (RD) per 10 000 person-years of anticoagulant treatment, incidence rate ratios (IRRs).

RESULTS:

There were 1 643 123 patients with 1 713 183 new episodes of oral anticoagulant treatment included in the cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [2.4] years, 651 427 person-years of follow-up [56.1%] were for women, and the indication was atrial fibrillation for 870 330 person-years [74.9%]). During 754 389 treatment person-years without PPI cotherapy, the adjusted incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (n = 7119) was 115 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 112-118). The incidence for rivaroxaban (n = 1278) was 144 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 136-152), which was significantly greater than the incidence of hospitalizations for apixaban (n = 279; 73 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.73-2.25]; RD, 70.9 [95% CI, 59.1-82.7]), dabigatran (n = 629; 120 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; RD, 23.4 [95% CI, 10.6-36.2]), and warfarin (n = 4933; 113 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.19-1.35]; RD, 30.4 [95% CI, 20.3-40.6]). The incidence for apixaban was significantly lower than that for dabigatran (IRR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70]; RD, -47.5 [95% CI,-60.6 to -34.3]) and warfarin (IRR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.73]; RD, -40.5 [95% CI, -50.0 to -31.0]). When anticoagulant treatment with PPI cotherapy (264 447 person-years; 76 per 10 000 person-years) was compared with treatment without PPI cotherapy, risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding hospitalizations (n = 2245) was lower overall (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]) and for apixaban (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.85]; RD, -24 [95% CI, -38 to -11]), dabigatran (IRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.41-0.59]; RD, -61.1 [95% CI, -74.8 to -47.4]), rivaroxaban (IRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; RD, -35.5 [95% CI, -48.6 to -22.4]), and warfarin (IRR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]; RD, -39.3 [95% CI, -44.5 to -34.2]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

Among patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment, incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was the highest in patients prescribed rivaroxaban, and the lowest for patients prescribed apixaban. For each anticoagulant, the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was lower among patients who were receiving PPI cotherapy. These findings may inform assessment of risks and benefits when choosing anticoagulant agents.

Author/s:

Ray, Wayne A., Chung, Cecilia P., Murray, Katherine T., Smalley, Walter E., Daugherty, James R., Dupont, William D.