insulin

Islets of Langerhans Transplantation

Diabetic Ketoacidosis

self-management

Consensus

Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

Inpatients

follow-up studies

Hypoglycemia

Insulin, Regular, Human

Pancreas

Writing

health personnel

A Consensus statement from the ADA on management of Type 1 diabetes in adults.

View

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) convened a writing group to develop a consensus statement on the management of type 1 diabetes in adults. The writing group has considered the rapid development of new treatments and technologies and addressed the following topics: diagnosis, aims of management, schedule of care, diabetes self-management education and support, glucose monitoring, insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, behavioral considerations, psychosocial care, diabetic ketoacidosis, pancreas and islet transplantation, adjunctive therapies, special populations, inpatient management, and future perspectives. Although we discuss the schedule for follow-up examinations and testing, we have not included the evaluation and treatment of the chronic microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes as these are well-reviewed and discussed elsewhere. The writing group was aware of both national and international guidance on type 1 diabetes and did not seek to replicate this but rather aimed to highlight the major areas that health care professionals should consider when managing adults with type 1 diabetes. Though evidence-based where possible, the recommendations in the report represent the consensus opinion of the authors.

Author/s:

Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., Skyler, J. S., Snoek, F. J., Weinstock, R. S., Peters, A. L.

Treatment-induced neuropathy of diabetes related to abrupt glycemic control

Bethie Seay — Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

July 20, 2021

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

DOI (1):

10.1503/cmaj.202091

MeSH

female

diabetes mellitus, type 1

Autonomic nervous system diseases

Peripheral nervous system diseases

neuropathy, painful

pain

Retinal diseases

Humans

Aggressive management of blood glucose levels can sometimes precipitate painful peripheral neuropathy, which is usually temporary but may require treatment.

View

KEY POINTS
Rapid correction of glycemic control (i.e., > 2 percentage points of hemoglobin A1c) over 3 months may lead to treatment-induced neuropathy of diabetes.

Symptoms include painful neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, gastroparesis, early worsening of retinopathy and microalbuminuria.

Women and people with type 1 diabetes are at elevated risk of treatment-induced neuropathy of diabetes.

Management of the condition may include involvement of a dietitian, adjustment of insulin dose and use of medications to improve symptoms such as painful neuropathy, postural hypotension and gastroparesis.

Author/s:

Stainforth-Dubois, M., Mcdonald, E. G.

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Saige Blanchard — Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:00:00 +0000

Date Added:

June 8, 2021

Journal/Publication:

Journal of the American Medical Association

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

June 8, 2021

Issue:

Volume:

325

Pages:

2262-2272

URL:

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2021.7444

Keywords

PMID (1):

34077499

MeSH

Effects of weight loss during a very low carbohydrate diet on specific adipose tissue depots and insulin sensitivity in older adults with obesity: a randomized clinical trial

Use of continuous glucose monitoring devices by people with Type 2 diabetes who are being treated with supplementary basal insulin results in significantly better glycemic control. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Importance: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to be beneficial for adults with type 2 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy, but its use in type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin has not been well studied.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin in primary care practices.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 15 centers in the US (enrollment from July 30, 2018, to October 30, 2019; follow-up completed July 7, 2020) and included adults with type 2 diabetes receiving their diabetes care from a primary care clinician and treated with 1 or 2 daily injections of long- or intermediate-acting basal insulin without prandial insulin, with or without noninsulin glucose-lowering medications.

Interventions: Random assignment 2:1 to CGM (n = 116) or traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) monitoring (n = 59).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at 8 months. Key secondary outcomes were CGM-measured time in target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with glucose level at greater than 250 mg/dL, and mean glucose level at 8 months.

Results: Among 175 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [9] years; 88 women [50%]; 92 racial/ethnic minority individuals [53%]; mean [SD] baseline HbA1c level, 9.1% [0.9%]), 165 (94%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 9.1% at baseline to 8.0% at 8 months in the CGM group and from 9.0% to 8.4% in the BGM group (adjusted difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.8% to -0.1%]; P = .02). In the CGM group, compared with the BGM group, the mean percentage of CGM-measured time in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL was 59% vs 43% (adjusted difference, 15% [95% CI, 8% to 23%]; P < .001), the mean percentage of time at greater than 250 mg/dL was 11% vs 27% (adjusted difference, -16% [95% CI, -21% to -11%]; P < .001), and the means of the mean glucose values were 179 mg/dL vs 206 mg/dL (adjusted difference, -26 mg/dL [95% CI, -41 to -12]; P < .001). Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 1 participant (1%) in the CGM group and in 1 (2%) in the BGM group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin, continuous glucose monitoring, as compared with blood glucose meter monitoring, resulted in significantly lower HbA1c levels at 8 months.

Author/s:

Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., Pop-Busui, R., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Bao, S., Umpierrez, G., Davis, G., Kruger, D., Bhargava, A., Young, L., McGill, J. B., Aleppo, G., Nguyen, Q. T., Orozco, I., Biggs, W., Lucas, K. J., Polonsky, W. H., Buse, J. B., Price, D., Bergenstal, R. M.

Effects of weight loss during a very low carbohydrate diet on specific adipose tissue depots and insulin sensitivity in older adults with obesity: a randomized clinical trial

Brian Desmarais — Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:39:54 +0000

Date Added:

August 25, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Nutrition & Metabolism

Publication Date:

August 12, 2020

URL:

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1186/s12986-020-00481-9

MeSH

Absorptiometry, Photon

Glucose Clamp Technique

obesity

Body Composition

Carbohydrate-Restricted

This short-term (8-week) RCT found that 60-75 years old adults with obesity lost a lot more weight and visceral adipose tissue and increased their insulin sensitivity more when following a low carbohydrate diet than when following a low fat diet. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Background: Insulin resistance and accumulation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) place aging adults with obesity at high risk of cardio-metabolic disease. A very low carbohydrate diet (VLCD) may be a means of promoting fat loss from the visceral cavity and skeletal muscle, without compromising lean mass, and improve insulin sensitivity in aging adults with obesity.

Objective: To determine if a VLCD promotes a greater loss of fat (total, visceral and intermuscular), preserves lean mass, and improves insulin sensitivity compared to a standard CHO-based/low-fat diet (LFD) in older adults with obesity.

Design: Thirty-four men and women aged 60-75 years with obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30-40 kg/m2) were randomized to a diet prescription of either a VLCD (< 10:25:> 65% energy from CHO:protein:fat) or LFD diet (55:25:20) for 8 weeks. Body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), fat distribution by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), insulin sensitivity by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, and lipids by a fasting blood draw were assessed at baseline and after the intervention.

Results: Participants lost an average of 9.7 and 2.0% in total fat following the VLCD and LFD, respectively (p < 0.01). The VLCD group experienced ~ 3-fold greater loss in VAT compared to the LFD group (- 22.8% vs - 1.0%, p < 0.001) and a greater decrease in thigh-IMAT (- 24.4% vs - 1.0%, p < 0.01). The VLCD group also had significantly greater thigh skeletal muscle (SM) at 8 weeks following adjustment for change in total fat mass. Finally, the VLCD had greater increases in insulin sensitivity and HDL-C and decreases in fasting insulin and triglycerides compared to the LFD group.

Conclusions: Weight loss resulting from consumption of a diet lower in CHO and higher in fat may be beneficial for older adults with obesity by depleting adipose tissue depots most strongly implicated in poor metabolic and functional outcomes and by improving insulin sensitivity and the lipid profile.

Trial registration: NCT02760641. Registered 03 May 2016 - Retrospectively registered.

Author/s:

Gower, Babara, Goss, Amy, Soleymani, Taraneh, Stewart , Mariah, Pendergrass, May, Lockhart, Mark, Kranz, Olivia, Dowla, Shima, Bush, Nikki, Barry, Valene Garr, Fontaine, Kevin R.

Using Insulin to Treat Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes in 2020

John Bayhi — Tue, 26 May 2020 20:43:16 +0000

Date Added:

May 26, 2020

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

May 22, 2020

Volume:

Online ahead of print

URL:

Using Insulin to Treat Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes in 2020

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2020.1303

Keywords

PMID (1):

32442246

MeSH

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

hypoglycemic agents

dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors

Metformin

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor

Thiazolidinediones

A potentially useful decision algorithm for management of patients with Type 2 diabetes, which includes early consideration of use of basal insulin in patients with A1c > 9%. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

No abstract available

Author/s:

Hirsch, IB, Gaudiani, LM

Summary of Revisions: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020

John Bayhi — Sat, 14 Mar 2020 19:35:38 +0000

Date Added:

March 14, 2020

Journal/Publication:

Diabetes Care

Publisher:

American Diabetes Association

Publication Date:

January 1, 2020

Issue:

Supplement 1

Volume:

Pages:

S4-S6

URL:

Summary of Revisions: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.2337/dc20-Srev

Keywords

PMID (1):

31862743

MeSH

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Ficus

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor

Pharmaceutical Preparations

cardiovascular diseases

Consensus

Farmers

Cystic Fibrosis

Transients and Migrants

depression

Smell

Patient Comfort

electronic nicotine delivery systems

Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

celiac disease

follow-up studies

Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults

seasons

social determinants of health

Standard of Care

Time-to-Treatment

united states food and drug administration

risk reduction behavior

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

glucagon-like peptide 1

anxiety disorders

Feeding and Eating Disorders

thyroid diseases

Infections

This is a three-page summary of the 2020 updates to the ADA Guidelines for Type 2 diabetes. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

No abstract available.

Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial

Jeffrey Wilson — Wed, 06 Mar 2019 16:21:52 +0000

Date Added:

March 6, 2019

Journal/Publication:

The Lancet

Publisher:

Elsevier

Publication Date:

December 5, 2017

Issue:

10120

Volume:

391

Pages:

541-551

URL:

Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1

Keywords

diet

diabetes

type 2 diabetes

PMID (1):

29221645

MeSH

Prediction of individual life-years gained without cardiovascular events from lipid, blood pressure, glucose, and aspirin treatment based on data of more than 500 000 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

hypoglycemic agents

antihypertensive agents

diet

chronic disease

This study, called the DiRECT trial, showed that it is possible to “cure” type 2 diabetes without meds in a significant number of patients with a carefully controlled diet and maintenance program.

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

BACKGROUND:

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disorder that requires lifelong treatment. We aimed to assess whether intensive weight management within routine primary care would achieve remission of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

We did this open-label, cluster-randomised trial (DiRECT) at 49 primary care practices in Scotland and the Tyneside region of England. Practices were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated list, to provide either a weight management programme (intervention) or best-practice care by guidelines (control), with stratification for study site (Tyneside or Scotland) and practice list size (>5700 or ≤5700). Participants, carers, and research assistants who collected outcome data were aware of group allocation; however, allocation was concealed from the study statistician. We recruited individuals aged 20-65 years who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the past 6 years, had a body-mass index of 27-45 kg/m2, and were not receiving insulin. The intervention comprised withdrawal of antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs, total diet replacement (825-853 kcal/day formula diet for 3-5 months), stepped food reintroduction (2-8 weeks), and structured support for long-term weight loss maintenance. Co-primary outcomes were weight loss of 15 kg or more, and remission of diabetes, defined as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of less than 6·5% (<48 mmol/mol) after at least 2 months off all antidiabetic medications, from baseline to 12 months. These outcomes were analysed hierarchically. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 03267836.

FINDINGS:

Between July 25, 2014, and Aug 5, 2017, we recruited 306 individuals from 49 intervention (n=23) and control (n=26) general practices; 149 participants per group comprised the intention-to-treat population. At 12 months, we recorded weight loss of 15 kg or more in 36 (24%) participants in the intervention group and no participants in the control group (p<0·0001). Diabetes remission was achieved in 68 (46%) participants in the intervention group and six (4%) participants in the control group (odds ratio 19·7, 95% CI 7·8-49·8; p<0·0001). Remission varied with weight loss in the whole study population, with achievement in none of 76 participants who gained weight, six (7%) of 89 participants who maintained 0-5 kg weight loss, 19 (34%) of 56 participants with 5-10 kg loss, 16 (57%) of 28 participants with 10-15 kg loss, and 31 (86%) of 36 participants who lost 15 kg or more. Mean bodyweight fell by 10·0 kg (SD 8·0) in the intervention group and 1·0 kg (3·7) in the control group (adjusted difference -8·8 kg, 95% CI -10·3 to -7·3; p<0·0001). Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimensions visual analogue scale, improved by 7·2 points (SD 21·3) in the intervention group, and decreased by 2·9 points (15·5) in the control group (adjusted difference 6·4 points, 95% CI 2·5-10·3; p=0·0012). Nine serious adverse events were reported by seven (4%) of 157 participants in the intervention group and two were reported by two (1%) participants in the control group. Two serious adverse events (biliary colic and abdominal pain), occurring in the same participant, were deemed potentially related to the intervention. No serious adverse events led to withdrawal from the study.

INTERPRETATION:

Our findings show that, at 12 months, almost half of participants achieved remission to a non-diabetic state and off antidiabetic drugs. Remission of type 2 diabetes is a practical target for primary care.

Author/s:

Lean, Michael E.J., Leslie, Wilma S., Barnes, Alison C., Brosnahan, Naomi, Thom, George, McCombie, Louise, Peters, Carl, Zhyzhneuskaya, Sviatlana, Al-Mrabeh, Ahmad, Hollingsworth, Kieren G., Rodrigues, Angela M., Rehackova, Lucia, Adamson, Ashley J., Sniehotta, Falko F., Mathers, John C., Ross, Hazel M., McIlvenna, Yvonne, Stefanetti, Renae, Trenell, Michael, Welsh, Paul, Kean, Sharon, Ford, Ian, McConnachie, Alex, Sattar, Naveed, Taylor, Roy

Prediction of individual life-years gained without cardiovascular events from lipid, blood pressure, glucose, and aspirin treatment based on data of more than 500 000 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Jeffrey Wilson — Sun, 03 Feb 2019 21:22:07 +0000

Date Added:

February 3, 2019

Journal/Publication:

European Heart Journal

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Publication Date:

January 9, 2019

URL:

Type:

Clinical Decision Aids

DOI (1):

10.1093/eurheartj/ehy839

Keywords

cardiovascular disease

cardiovascular events

PMID (1):

30629157

MeSH

glycated hemoglobin, A

lipoprotein cholesterol

blood pressure

Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question

glucose

cardiovascular diseases

RPR Commentary: The authors have developed and validated several calculators that predict lifetime risk of CV events based upon age, gender, smoking, blood pressure, lipids, A1c, and use of antiplatelet agents. They can be accessed at www.U-Prevent.com.

Commercial full text (fees may apply)

View

AIMS:

Although group-level effectiveness of lipid, blood pressure, glucose, and aspirin treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proven by trials, important differences in absolute effectiveness exist between individuals. We aim to develop and validate a prediction tool for individualizing lifelong CVD prevention in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) predicting life-years gained without myocardial infarction or stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

We developed and validated the Diabetes Lifetime-perspective prediction (DIAL) model, consisting of two complementary competing risk adjusted Cox proportional hazards functions using data from people with T2DM registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Registry (n = 389 366). Competing outcomes were (i) CVD events (vascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and (ii) non-vascular mortality. Predictors were age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, haemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, non- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, albuminuria, T2DM duration, insulin treatment, and history of CVD. External validation was performed using data from the ADVANCE, ACCORD, ASCOT and ALLHAT-LLT-trials, the SMART and EPIC-NL cohorts, and the Scottish diabetes register (total n = 197 785). Predicted and observed CVD-free survival showed good agreement in all validation sets. C-statistics for prediction of CVD were 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-0.84) and 0.64-0.65 for internal and external validation, respectively. We provide an interactive calculator at www.U-Prevent.com that combines model predictions with relative treatment effects from trials to predict individual benefit from preventive treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Cardiovascular disease-free life expectancy and effects of lifelong prevention in terms of CVD-free life-years gained can be estimated for people with T2DM using readily available clinical characteristics. Predictions of individual-level treatment effects facilitate translation of trial results to individual patients.

Author/s:

Berkelmans, Gijs F N, Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia, Visseren, Frank L J, Wild, Sarah H, Franzen, Stefan, Chalmers, John, Davis, Barry R, Poulter, Neil R, Spijkerman, Annemieke M, Woodward, Mark, Pressel, Sara L, Gupta, Ajay K, van der Schouw, Yvonne T, Svensson, Ann-Marie

Choosing Wisely - 5 Things Physicians & Patients Should Question

Jeffrey Wilson — Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:04:50 +0000

Date Added:

January 22, 2019

Publisher:

Society of General Internal Medicine

Publication Date:

April 1, 2016

URL:

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

Keywords

diabetes

home blood glucose monitoring

MeSH

diabetes mellitus, type 1

Glucose Self-monitoring in Non–Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings

Most patients with type 2 diabetes do not benefit from home blood glucose monitoring.

Free full text

Don’t recommend daily home finger glucose testing in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus not using insulin.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is an integral part of patient self-management in maintaining safe and target-driven glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, daily finger glucose testing has no benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not on insulin or medications associated with hypoglycemia, and small, but significant, patient harms are associated with daily glucose testing. SMBG should be reserved for patients during the titration of their medication doses or during periods of changes in patients’ diet and exercise routines.

Author/s:

Subramanian, Usha, Burger, Alfred, Bailey, Jim, Gleason, Nathaniel, Pahwa, Amit

Glucose Self-monitoring in Non–Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings

Jeffrey Wilson — Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:11:53 +0000

Date Added:

December 11, 2018

Journal/Publication:

JAMA Internal Medicine

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Publication Date:

July 10, 2017

Issue:

Volume:

177

Pages:

920-929

URL:

Type:

Clinical Research Results

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1233

Keywords

type 2 diabetes

quality of life

PMID (1):

28600913

MeSH

quality of life