Atopic

Major modifiable risk factors for childhood food allergies include delayed introduction of solid foods and early treatment with antibiotics. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

View

Importance: The incidence and risk (predictive) factors for early life food allergy development remain uncertain.

Objective: To estimate the incidence and quantify risk factors for food allergy development.

Data sources: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to January 1, 2025. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2025, to November 25, 2025.

Study selection: Incidence estimates included studies confirming food allergy via food challenge. Risk factor analyses included cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies in any language assessing children younger than 6 years using multivariable analyses.

Data extraction and synthesis: Paired reviewers independently extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled incidence and adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool, and certainty of evidence assessed using GRADE.

Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was food allergy to age 6 years.

Results: A total of 190 studies involving 2.8 million participants across 40 countries were analyzed. Among studies using food challenge, overall food allergy incidence was likely 4.7% (moderate certainty). Among 176 studies identifying 342 risk factors with varying certainty, the strongest and most certain factors included prior allergic conditions (eg, atopic dermatitis [eczema] within the first year of life [OR, 3.88; risk difference [RD], 12.0%; 95% CI, 8.8%-15.7%], allergic rhinitis [OR, 3.39; RD, 10.1%; 95% CI, 6.7%-14.4%], and wheeze [OR, 2.11; RD, 5.0%; 95% CI, 2.1%-8.8%]), severity of atopic dermatitis (OR, 1.22; RD, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.6%), increased skin transepidermal water loss (OR, 3.36; RD, 10.0%; 95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%), filaggrin gene sequence variations (OR, 1.93; RD, 4.2%; 95% CI, 2.4%-6.4%), delayed solid food introduction (eg, peanut after age 12 months [OR, 2.55; RD, 6.8%; 95% CI, 1.9%-14.6%]), infant antibiotic use (first month [OR, 4.11; RD, 12.8%; 95% CI, 0.4%-40%], first year [OR, 1.39; RD, 1.8%; 95% CI, 0.8%-3.1%], during pregnancy [OR, 1.32; RD, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.6%-2.5%]), male sex (OR, 1.24; RD, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.6%), firstborn child (OR, 1.13; RD, 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.0%), family history of food allergy (eg, mother [OR, 1.98; RD, 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.5%-6.8%], father [OR, 1.69; RD, 3.2%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.5%], both parents [OR, 2.07; RD, 4.8%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.5%], siblings [OR, 2.36; RD, 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.4%-8.0%]), parental migration (OR, 3.28; RD, 9.7%; 95% CI, 4.9%-16.3%), self-identification as Black (vs White [OR, 3.93; RD, 12.1%; 95% CI, 5.2%-22.5%], vs non-Hispanic White [OR, 2.23; RD, 5.5%; 95% CI, 3.0%-8.7%]), and cesarean delivery (OR, 1.16; RD, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.2%). Factors like low birth weight, postterm birth, maternal diet, and stress during pregnancy showed no significant risk difference.

Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis, the most credible risk factors associated with development of childhood food allergy are a combination of major and minor risk factors, including early allergic conditions (atopic march/diathesis), delayed allergen introduction, genetics, antibiotic exposure, demographic factors, and birth-related variables.

Author/s:

Nazmul Islam, Alexandro W L Chu, Falana Sheriff, Farid Foroutan, Gordon H Guyatt, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Paul Oykhman, Alfonso Iorio, Ariel Izcovich, Katherine M Morrison, Yetiani Roldan Benitez

Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Megan George — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:59:01 +0000

Date Added:

August 21, 2025

Journal/Publication:

JAMA

Publication Date:

August 20, 2025

URL:

Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.1001/jama.2025.11589

Keywords

dermatology

atopic dermaitis

A review of currently available treatment methods for patients with atopic dermatitis. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Not Available

Author/s:

Aaron M. Drucker

JAK 1-3 inhibitors and TYK-2 inhibitors in dermatology: Practical pearls for the primary care physician

Alex Haga — Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:38:30 +0000

Date Added:

October 23, 2024

Journal/Publication:

Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

Publication Date:

October 1, 2024

Issue:

Volume:

Pages:

4128-4134

URL:

JAK 1-3 inhibitors and TYK-2 inhibitors in dermatology: Practical pearls for the primary care physician

Type:

Meta-analyses, Reviews, and Guidelines

Format:

Article

DOI (1):

10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_112_24

Keywords

Alopecia areata

atopic

Atopic Dermatitis

Janus Kinase inhibitors

psoriasis

tyrosine-protein kinase inhibitors

MeSH

Janus Kinase Inhibitors

A review of JSK and TYK inhibitors for treatment of dermatologic conditions. James W. Mold, MD, MPH

Free full text

View

Guidelines for primary care clinicians on monitoring and safety guidelines regarding Janus kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions are often unclear. This review aims to provide the primary care physician with a review of clinically relevant and updated information regarding the monitoring and overall profile of these medications. To do so, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed database and relevant Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug inserts from manufacturers. Janus kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors have recently gained FDA approval for the treatment of several inflammatory skin conditions including atopic dermatitis, plaque psoriasis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo. There is a known box warning associated with the Janus kinase inhibitors that create the need for monitoring and close follow-up while patients are undergoing these treatments. Although these medications are often prescribed by specialists, as their use becomes more prevalent and therapies continue to gain approval for the treatment of these commonly encountered conditions, it is important for the primary physician to be updated and aware of the current monitoring guidelines and safety profile for this class of medication. Both Janus kinase inhibitors and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors display significant efficacy in the treatment of their approved conditions and research continues to move forward with the approval of more medications from these classes.

Author/s:

Beard, Abigail, Trotter, Shannon C.