University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

A GUIDE to help patients and families better understand serious illnesses: Mnemonic device provides way to teach learners about advance care planning

Author/s:

Helen James, Warren Harris Lewin

Read more about A GUIDE to help patients and families better understand serious illnesses: Mnemonic device provides way to teach learners about advance care planning
Log in or register to post comments

Advance care planning (ACP) was identified as a priority in the 2006 final report of the Public Information and Awareness Working Group of the Canadian Strategy on Palliative and End-of-Life Care.1 An important component of ACP is patients’ understanding of their prognoses, which might include expectations related to future function, symptoms, and life expectancy.2-4 Without realistic prognostic information, patients are at risk of not engaging in ACP that would otherwise help them gain control over their illnesses, reduce anxiety, and avoid unwanted treatments.2,3,5 Moreover, lack of that information might lead to challenging downstream goals-of-care conversations. In guidance published in 2023 regarding a physician’s duty to discuss a patient’s medical condition and prognosis during a goals-of-care discussion when the physician deems cardiopulmonary resuscitation not to be indicated, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario highlighted the importance of physicians being able to communicate prognoses skillfully.6

Keywords

advance care planning terminal care end of life care Life expectancy anxiety

Demystifying breast cancer

Author/s:

Wilkinson, A. N.

Read more about Demystifying breast cancer
Log in or register to post comments

The first question a patient often asks their FP after receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) is “What will my treatment be?” This article will help FPs answer this complex question by reviewing multimodal therapy for BC, which is contingent on molecular subtype and stage.

Keywords

breast cancer treatment surgery therapy chemotherapy

Parkinson disease primer, part 1: diagnosis

Author/s:

Frank, C., Chiu, R., Lee, J.

Read more about Parkinson disease primer, part 1: diagnosis
Log in or register to post comments

Objective To provide family physicians an updated approach to the diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD).

Sources of information Published guidelines on the diagnosis and management of PD were reviewed. Database searches were conducted to retrieve relevant research articles published between 2011 and 2021. Evidence levels ranged from I to III.

Main message Diagnosis of PD is predominantly clinical. Family physicians should evaluate patients for specific features of parkinsonism, then determine whether symptoms are attributable to PD. Levodopa trials can be used to help confirm the diagnosis and alleviate motor symptoms of PD. “Red flag” features and absence of response to levodopa may point to other causes of parkinsonism and prompt more urgent referral.

Conclusion Access to neurologists and specialized clinics varies, and Canadian family physicians can be important players in facilitating early and accurate diagnosis of PD. Applying an organized approach to diagnosis and considering motor and nonmotor symptoms can greatly benefit patients with PD. Part 2 in this series will review management of PD.

Parkinson disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurodegenerative condition, with prevalence predicted to double from more than 6 million globally in 2015 to more than 12 million by 2040.1 Recognizing parkinsonism and having knowledge of the presentation, diagnosis, and management of motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD are increasingly important, particularly as access to neurologists and specialized clinics is limited in many parts of Canada.2 Family physicians are well placed to identify symptoms, participate in diagnosis, and collaborate with specialty clinics in management of patients through the course of the disease.

Keywords

Levodopa Parkinson's Disease diagnosis Parkinson Humans