Humans

Objective: To provide primary care physicians with an evidence-based approach to recognizing and managing mallet finger injuries.

Sources of information: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant key words and subject headings. Recommendations were categorized based on clinical evidence and expert opinion using a 3-level classification system.

Main message: A mallet finger injury commonly occurs after an axial load, resulting in avulsion of the extensor tendon from the distal phalanx. This may occur with or without an avulsion fracture. Diagnosis is made clinically, with x-ray scans used to assess for an associated fracture and joint alignment. Nonsurgical management with continuous splinting for 6 to 8 weeks is the standard of care and achieves excellent outcomes even in cases of delayed presentation. Surgery referral may be considered for avulsion fractures resulting in joint subluxation, open injuries, and failure of conservative management. Untreated mallet finger injuries can lead to chronic swan-neck deformities, which may limit function.

Conclusion: Mallet finger injuries may be easily recognized and managed in the primary care settings, resulting in excellent patient outcomes without the need for specialist referral. This review should equip primary care physicians with confidence in diagnosing a mallet finger injury, initiating appropriate splinting, providing patient education, and recognizing indications for surgical referral.

Importance: The incidence and risk (predictive) factors for early life food allergy development remain uncertain.

Objective: To estimate the incidence and quantify risk factors for food allergy development.

Data sources: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to January 1, 2025. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2025, to November 25, 2025.

Study selection: Incidence estimates included studies confirming food allergy via food challenge. Risk factor analyses included cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies in any language assessing children younger than 6 years using multivariable analyses.

Data extraction and synthesis: Paired reviewers independently extracted data. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled incidence and adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool, and certainty of evidence assessed using GRADE.

Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was food allergy to age 6 years.

Results: A total of 190 studies involving 2.8 million participants across 40 countries were analyzed. Among studies using food challenge, overall food allergy incidence was likely 4.7% (moderate certainty). Among 176 studies identifying 342 risk factors with varying certainty, the strongest and most certain factors included prior allergic conditions (eg, atopic dermatitis [eczema] within the first year of life [OR, 3.88; risk difference [RD], 12.0%; 95% CI, 8.8%-15.7%], allergic rhinitis [OR, 3.39; RD, 10.1%; 95% CI, 6.7%-14.4%], and wheeze [OR, 2.11; RD, 5.0%; 95% CI, 2.1%-8.8%]), severity of atopic dermatitis (OR, 1.22; RD, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.6%), increased skin transepidermal water loss (OR, 3.36; RD, 10.0%; 95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%), filaggrin gene sequence variations (OR, 1.93; RD, 4.2%; 95% CI, 2.4%-6.4%), delayed solid food introduction (eg, peanut after age 12 months [OR, 2.55; RD, 6.8%; 95% CI, 1.9%-14.6%]), infant antibiotic use (first month [OR, 4.11; RD, 12.8%; 95% CI, 0.4%-40%], first year [OR, 1.39; RD, 1.8%; 95% CI, 0.8%-3.1%], during pregnancy [OR, 1.32; RD, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.6%-2.5%]), male sex (OR, 1.24; RD, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.6%), firstborn child (OR, 1.13; RD, 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.0%), family history of food allergy (eg, mother [OR, 1.98; RD, 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.5%-6.8%], father [OR, 1.69; RD, 3.2%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.5%], both parents [OR, 2.07; RD, 4.8%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.5%], siblings [OR, 2.36; RD, 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.4%-8.0%]), parental migration (OR, 3.28; RD, 9.7%; 95% CI, 4.9%-16.3%), self-identification as Black (vs White [OR, 3.93; RD, 12.1%; 95% CI, 5.2%-22.5%], vs non-Hispanic White [OR, 2.23; RD, 5.5%; 95% CI, 3.0%-8.7%]), and cesarean delivery (OR, 1.16; RD, 1.0%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.2%). Factors like low birth weight, postterm birth, maternal diet, and stress during pregnancy showed no significant risk difference.

Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis, the most credible risk factors associated with development of childhood food allergy are a combination of major and minor risk factors, including early allergic conditions (atopic march/diathesis), delayed allergen introduction, genetics, antibiotic exposure, demographic factors, and birth-related variables.

Background: No therapies have been approved to alter bronchiectasis progression. Dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1) inhibitors, which target neutrophil serine protease activation, are under investigation as potential disease-modifying agents.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DPP-1 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP were searched from inception until April 26, 2025. Primary outcomes included time to first exacerbation and proportion of patients remaining exacerbation-free. Secondary outcomes included post-bronchodilator % Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) questionnaire scores, and rate of adverse events. Time-to-event outcome was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated individual patient data (IPD), whereas random-effects meta-analyses were performed for remaining outcomes.

Results: 2523 patients from four RCTs were included, of whom 1689 (66.9 %) received DPP-1 inhibitors. Compared with placebo, DPP-1 inhibitors prolonged the time to first exacerbation (HR 0.79; 95 % CI: 0.71 to 0.88) and increased the proportion of patients remaining exacerbation-free (RR 1.33; 95 % CI 1.12 to 1.58). A slower decline in post-bronchodilator % FEV1 was observed (MD 1.1 %; 95 % CI 0.05 to 2.15), but no difference in QoL-B scores (MD 1.35; 95 % CI -0.72 to 3.42). The safety profile of DPP-1 inhibitors was acceptable and comparable to placebo. Moderate certainty was found across endpoints.

Conclusions: DPP-1 inhibitors prolong time to first exacerbation and reduce exacerbation rates in patients with bronchiectasis, with an acceptable safety profile. These findings support their potential as a disease-modifying strategy.

Registration: PROSPERO (CRD420251042542).

Keywords: Bronchiectasis; DPP-1 inhibitor; Dipeptidyl-peptidases and tripeptidyl-peptidases; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic review.

Importance: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in ambulatory care settings and the primary reason for antibiotic prescribing. Despite several guidelines focused on the type and duration of antibiotics prescribed for treating UTI, there is limited outpatient guidance on how to best triage patients with presumed UTI.

Objective: To assess the appropriateness of different triage and management recommendations involving empiric antibiotics, urine testing strategies, and visit types and how these recommendations vary by patient sex, age, presenting symptoms, and clinical history.

Evidence review: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, a 13-member multidisciplinary panel (physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses) performed a scoping review of the literature publications from 2009 to June 2024 and rated the appropriateness of 136 clinical scenarios (48 for women, 49 for men, and 39 scenarios not specific to sex) with up to 9 management strategies per scenario for a total of 1094 scenarios. For each scenario, experts rated the appropriateness of empiric treatment, types of urine testing, and triage to visit type (in-person, virtual, or none) as appropriate (ie, benefits outweigh risks), inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness. Appropriateness ratings were summarized into 2 groups: nonpregnant adult women and adult men.

Findings: Major recommendations based on symptoms included (1) same-day in-person evaluation if symptoms were concerning for pyelonephritis, complicated cystitis, or urinary obstruction; (2) a visit if additional nonurinary symptoms were present (ie, diarrhea, genital discharge, or cough); (3) neither urine testing nor empiric treatment solely due to a change in urine color or appearance without other bladder (cystitis) symptoms; (4) empiric treatment without testing or a visit, for women, if there were new classic cystitis symptoms of dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, or suprapubic pain without risks for antibiotic resistance; (5) urinalysis with culture (ideally reflexed to culture) before taking first antibiotic dose for women at risk of antibiotic resistance (eg, recent antibiotic treatment for UTI or recurrent UTIs) and all men; and (6) empiric treatment considered for patients with barriers to obtaining timely urine testing or visits.

Conclusions and relevance: The appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, urine testing, and different clinical evaluation options were defined for adults presenting with concerns for UTI in common ambulatory triage settings, including telehealth. These criteria for ambulatory triage of suspected UTI symptoms in adults are anticipated to help standardize and improve the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic prescribing, urine testing, and visit type triage.