1. Home
  2. anticoagulants

anticoagulants

Meta-Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy as an Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Author/s: 
Lee, SR, Rhee, TM, Kang, DY, Choi, EK, Oh, S, Lip, GYH

Guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy without antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) of >1 year after myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. More evidences are required for the safety and efficacy of OAC monotherapy compared with OAC plus APT. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched up to February 2019. Nonrandomized studies and randomized clinical trials comparing OAC monotherapy with OAC plus single APT (SAPT) for patients with stable CAD and nonvalvular AF. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of ischemic or thrombotic events) and secondary outcomes included major bleeding, stroke, all-cause death, and net adverse events (composite of ischemic, thrombotic, or bleeding events). From 6 trials, 8,855 patients were included. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular event in patients with AF treated using OAC plus SAPT compared with those treated with OAC monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92 to 1.29). OAC plus SAPT was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared with OAC monotherapy (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.87), as well as in terms of net adverse event (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43). There were no significant differences in rates of stroke and all-cause death. In conclusion, in this meta-analysis, OAC monotherapy and OAC plus SAPT treatment showed similar effectiveness, but OAC monotherapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with OAC plus SAPT in patients with nonvalvular AF and stable CAD.

Keywords 
atrial fibrillation coronary artery disease CAD myocardial infarction stroke

Left Atrial Appendages Occlusion: Current Status and Prospective

Author/s: 
Sharma, S.P., Park, P., Lakkireddy, D.

Stroke continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) provides protection against stroke and peripheral embolization in AF but significant proportion of patients could not be started on anticoagulation because of bleeding complications. Left atrial appendage harbors clot in about 90% of nonvalvular AF. The advent of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) techniques has provided these patients with alternative to OAC for stroke prophylaxis. Multiple LAAO devices are currently available with Watchman and Amulet being the most commonly used in clinical practice. Randomized studies are available for Watchman device only. Data on Amplatzer Cardiac Plug, Amulet and Lariat devices are limited by the paucity of randomized data. Long-term data on different LAAO techniques are showing promising results. Device related thrombosis continues to be a serious complication associated with LAAO. Future studies should look into comparative effectiveness between different LAAO techniques, optimal patient selection, risk of complications, and anticoagulant treatment after LAAO. This article aims to provide current available evidence on efficacy and safety of different LAAO devices and future prospective.

Keywords 
Watchman device left atrial appendage stroke atrial fibrillation amulet

Periprocedural Bridging in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

Author/s: 
Baumgartner, C., de Kouchkovsky, I., Whitaker, E., Fang, M.C.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the most widely used anticoagulants, and bridging is commonly administered during periprocedural VKA interruption. Given the unclear benefits and risks of periprocedural bridging in patients with previous venousthromboembolism, we aimed to assess recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding outcomes with and without bridging in this population.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review searching the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 7, 2017 for randomized and nonrandomized studies that included adults with previous venous thromboembolism requiring VKA interruption to undergo an elective procedure, and that reported venous thromboembolism or bleeding outcomes. Quality of evidence was graded by consensus.

RESULTS:

We included 28 cohort studies (20 being single-arm cohorts) with, overall, 6915 procedures for analysis. In 27 studies reporting perioperative venous thromboembolism outcomes, the pooled incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism with bridging was 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4%-1.2%) and 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.8%) without bridging. Eighteen studies reported major or nonmajor bleeding outcomes. The pooled incidence of any bleeding was 3.9% (95% CI, 2.0%-7.4%) with bridging and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%) without bridging. In bridged patients at high thromboembolic risk, the pooled incidence for venous thromboembolism was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.5%) and 7.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-17.4%) for any bleeding. Quality of available evidence was very low, primarily due to a high risk of bias of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Periprocedural bridging increases the risk of bleeding compared with VKA interruption without bridging, without a significant difference in periprocedural venous thromboembolism rates.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Anticoagulants; Bleeding; Bridging; PROSPERO; Periprocedural; Venous thromboembolism; registration number CRD42017074710

Keywords 
warfarin risk assessment hemorrhage anticoagulants bleeding Bridging Periprocedural

Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Proton Pump Inhibitor Cotherapy With Hospitalization for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding.

Author/s: 
Ray, Wayne A., Chung, Cecilia P., Murray, Katherine T., Smalley, Walter E., Daugherty, James R., Dupont, William D.

IMPORTANCE:

Anticoagulant choice and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cotherapy could affect the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, a frequent and potentially serious complication of oral anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients using individual anticoagulants with and without PPI cotherapy, and to determine variation according to underlying gastrointestinal bleeding risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

Retrospective cohort study in Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015.

EXPOSURES:

Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin with or without PPI cotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

Hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: adjusted incidence and risk difference (RD) per 10 000 person-years of anticoagulant treatment, incidence rate ratios (IRRs).

RESULTS:

There were 1 643 123 patients with 1 713 183 new episodes of oral anticoagulant treatment included in the cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [2.4] years, 651 427 person-years of follow-up [56.1%] were for women, and the indication was atrial fibrillation for 870 330 person-years [74.9%]). During 754 389 treatment person-years without PPI cotherapy, the adjusted incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (n = 7119) was 115 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 112-118). The incidence for rivaroxaban (n = 1278) was 144 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 136-152), which was significantly greater than the incidence of hospitalizations for apixaban (n = 279; 73 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.73-2.25]; RD, 70.9 [95% CI, 59.1-82.7]), dabigatran (n = 629; 120 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; RD, 23.4 [95% CI, 10.6-36.2]), and warfarin (n = 4933; 113 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.19-1.35]; RD, 30.4 [95% CI, 20.3-40.6]). The incidence for apixaban was significantly lower than that for dabigatran (IRR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70]; RD, -47.5 [95% CI,-60.6 to -34.3]) and warfarin (IRR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.73]; RD, -40.5 [95% CI, -50.0 to -31.0]). When anticoagulant treatment with PPI cotherapy (264 447 person-years; 76 per 10 000 person-years) was compared with treatment without PPI cotherapy, risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding hospitalizations (n = 2245) was lower overall (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]) and for apixaban (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.85]; RD, -24 [95% CI, -38 to -11]), dabigatran (IRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.41-0.59]; RD, -61.1 [95% CI, -74.8 to -47.4]), rivaroxaban (IRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; RD, -35.5 [95% CI, -48.6 to -22.4]), and warfarin (IRR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]; RD, -39.3 [95% CI, -44.5 to -34.2]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

Among patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment, incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was the highest in patients prescribed rivaroxaban, and the lowest for patients prescribed apixaban. For each anticoagulant, the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was lower among patients who were receiving PPI cotherapy. These findings may inform assessment of risks and benefits when choosing anticoagulant agents.

Keywords 
warfarin apixaban dabigatran rivaroxaban proton pump inhibitor upper gastrointestinal tract anticoagulants atrial fibrillation

Anticoagulant Comparison Chart

Author/s: 
North American Thrombosis Forum

After being diagnosed with a blood clot, navigating the different medications can be confusing. NATF has designed a chart comparing the different anticoagulant medications, which include warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

This is a great tool for patients to use when talking to their doctors about which medication is right for them.

Keywords 
blood clot medication

Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Update

Author/s: 
Sanders, D. Gillian, Lowenstern, Angela, Borre, Ethan, Chatterjee, Ranee, Goode, Adam, Sharan, Lauren, Allen LaPointe, Nancy M., Raitz, Giselle, Shah, Bimal, Yapa, Roshini, Davis, J. Kelly, Lallinger, Kathryn, Schmidt, Robyn, Kosinski, Andrzej, Al-Khatib, Sana

Purpose of Review

To update a previous review in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) to determine the best assessment tools for predicting risk of stroke and bleeding, as well as the best treatment options to prevent stroke. Current treatments include new antithrombotic strategies, devices, and oral anticoagulants (oral direct thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors).

Key Messages

  • CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and ABC risk scores have the best evidence to support prediction of stroke events.
  • HAS-BLED has the best evidence to support prediction of bleeding risk.
  • Imaging tools for stroke prediction require further evidence.
  • Dabigatran (150 mg dose) is superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with no evidence for a difference in major bleeding. There may also be no evidence for a difference in myocardial infarction or all-cause mortality.
  • Apixaban is superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Apixaban also has less risk for major bleeding and may also decrease all-cause mortality compared to warfarin.
  • Rivaroxaban may be similar to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and in risk of major bleeding. Rivaroxaban is most likely similar to warfarin in the rate of all-cause mortality. However, inconsistent with the randomized controlled trial (RCT) findings, observational studies showed rivaroxaban may better prevent stroke or systemic embolism and may have a higher risk of major bleeding.
  • Edoxaban is most likely similar to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and also most likely has less risk for major bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke than warfarin.
  • Further RCTs directly comparing oral anticoagulants, including thrombin inhibitors and individual Xa inhibitors, are needed.

Structured Abstract

Objectives. This review updates previous reviews regarding the optimal risk stratification tools for stroke and bleeding prediction, and treatment options for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Data sources. We searched PubMed®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for relevant English-language comparative studies published from January 1, 2000, to February 14, 2018.

Review methods. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted data, rated quality and applicability, and graded evidence. When possible, random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects.

Results. Our review included 320 articles (185 unique studies). This included 61 studies relevant to predicting thromboembolic risk, 38 relevant to predicting bleeding risk, and 117 relevant to interventions for preventing thromboembolic (TE) events. Data suggest that the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and ABC risk scores have the best evidence predicting TE risk (moderate strength of evidence [SOE] for limited prediction ability of each score) and that the HAS-BLED score has the best evidence to predict bleeding risk (moderate SOE).

We found that a thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran 150 mg) was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke (including hemorrhagic) or systemic embolism (relative risk [RR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.82), with no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of major bleeding (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.07) (high SOE for both outcomes). The Xa inhibitor apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.95; high SOE), major bleeding (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80; high SOE), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.998; low SOE). Apixaban was also superior to aspirin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62), with similar risk for major bleeding (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.75) in patients who are not suitable for warfarin (moderate SOE for both outcomes). The Xa inhibitor edoxaban reduced hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding compared to warfarin (moderate SOE for both outcomes) but had no evidence of a difference in stroke or systemic embolism (moderate SOE) or myocardial infarction (moderate SOE). The Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was similar to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.03; moderate SOE), with similar rates of major bleeding (low SOE) and death (moderate SOE). Low SOE for major bleeding was due to a trend toward an increase in risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban seen in observational studies. Comparative effectiveness findings for stroke prevention were limited by the direct comparisons between individual direct oral anticoagulants. Evidence regarding nonpharmacologic interventions was sparse, but left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices showed a trend toward benefit over warfarin for strokes, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality that did not reach statistical significance. Higher adverse events (excessive bleeding or procedure-related complications) were observed with LAA (low SOE).

Conclusions. Overall, we found that CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and ABC scores have similar evidence regarding their ability to predict stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, whereas HAS-BLED has the best evidence to predict bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulants (specifically apixaban and dabigatran) demonstrate reductions in stroke events and reductions (apixaban) or similar (dabigatran) rates in bleeding events when compared with warfarin, while rivaroxaban was similar in both benefits and harms to warfarin. Edoxaban reduced hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding compared to warfarin but had no evidence of a difference in other outcomes. More studies are needed directly comparing oral anticoagulants, including thrombin inhibitors and individual Xa inhibitors.

Keywords 
stroke atrial fibrillation atrial flutter
Subscribe to anticoagulants